The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Profile of majorminor
  3. Show Posts
  4. Topics
  • Profile Info
    • Summary
    • Show Stats
    • Show Posts
      • Messages
      • Topics
      • Attachments
      • Thanked Posts
      • Posts Thanked By User
    • Show User Topics
      • User Created
      • User Participated In

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

  • Messages
  • Topics
  • Attachments
  • Thanked Posts
  • Posts Thanked By User

Topics - majorminor

Pages: [1]
1
General Science / Can I use rice cooker to cook other things, for example... ?
« on: 24/04/2013 21:42:07 »
I was given rice cooker as a present, cheap one from supermarket and I was wondering why it says I should not cook other foods in it , especially alkaline or acidic foodstuffs. I was wondering what would be the problem with cooking vegetables for example,  in the rice cooker. I know a lot of them are alkaline ... the ones I would most like to use are broccoli , cauliflower and green beans. Anyway, I am thinking there will be some reaction with the inner pot which is okay with me as long as there are no health ramifications. I do not mind if the usage of the product is the  only reason not to cook other stuff. Appreciate any advice on this. Thanks.

model no. CFXB15GS

2
That CAN'T be true! / More possible chess moves than atoms in the observable universe?
« on: 22/04/2013 12:12:53 »
I have been playing chess online  for over 10 years now and heard about this statistic a long time ago and assumed it was just some sort of joke. That there are more possible chess games or continuations than atoms in our observable universe!! Many years later Garry Kasparov (one of the greatest players ever) mentioned this fact !? in a TV interview and so of course I googled, and it  appears to be statistically consistent. I can understand its a statistical thing made possible by many repeating moves and situations but still it does not sit right with me and I am hoping it is refuted somehow in the future. To think of the amount of atoms in a grain of sand then to think of the amount of atoms in the universe .... surely somebody did not carry the 1 in their calculations. Maybe its all above board but I do not like it!

Pages: [1]
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.057 seconds with 23 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.