The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. Science Experiments
  4. How to improve radioactivity dice experiment?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

How to improve radioactivity dice experiment?

  • 1 Replies
  • 2416 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dgt20 (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 56
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
How to improve radioactivity dice experiment?
« on: 07/03/2018 03:42:38 »
Any suggestions to improve radioactivity dice experiment?
Logged
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 14822
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 1120 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: How to improve radioactivity dice experiment?
« Reply #1 on: 07/03/2018 07:50:29 »
Use lots more dice (the curve fit depends on the square root of the number of dice, so you need to scale up from 100 to 10,000 to make a significant difference). Or fewer real nuclei (with less than 10,000 nuclei you can really see the underlying randomness of the process).

Better still, accept that the continuous decay equation in the textbook is the idealised fit to an infinite number of events measured with infinitesimal accuracy - real measurements are a lot rougher than the smooth curve we publish, and subject to errors due to coincidence, dead time, self-absorption and sample discretisation. The statistical interpolation methods used to get from experimental numbers to published halflives are all in the advanced textbooks but would be regarded as a bit of a distraction in a classroom demonstration. I have worked with physicists, chemists, electronic engineers and mathematicians who spend their entire working lives smoothing out the curve!
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.055 seconds with 32 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.