[talanum1 (OP)]

My model predicts there should be a little Energy missing in pi-minus decay. Is this possible?

[Origin]

Is this possible?

It is probable that you do not know what you are talking about.

[Kryptid]

My model predicts there should be a little Energy missing in pi-minus decay. Is this possible?

How would that not violate conservation of energy?

[talanum1 (OP)]

How would that not violate conservation of energy?

By there being predicted another particle (massless).

[Bored chemist]

My model predicts

Your model has yet to make a single accurate prediction, but has made many errors.
Why do you keep going on about it?

[Kryptid]

By there being predicted another particle (massless).

Okay, how much energy should be missing?

[talanum1 (OP)]

Okay, how much energy should be missing?

Four space point's worth of. I don't know how much energy is in a space point.

[Bored chemist]

I don't know how much energy is in a space point.

The energy (or mass) of a non existent thing is undefined.

[talanum1 (OP)]

The energy (or mass) of a non existent thing is undefined.

Spacetime does exist, then space points must exist. Otherwise time coupled with nothing gives you spacetime - a contradiction.

It is six space points worth of not four.

[Bored chemist]

Spacetime does exist,

Yes.

then space points must exist.

No

Otherwise time coupled with nothing gives you spacetime

Gibberish.

[talanum1 (OP)]

Otherwise time coupled with nothing gives you spacetime
Gibberish.

Read: "Otherwise time coupled with space gives you spacetime...". Now replace "space" with "nothing" in the previous sentence. Still gibberish?

[Kryptid]

Space existing doesn't mean that space "points" must exist. If space turns out to be quantized, then that would suggest that there aren't dimensionless points anywhere.

[Origin]

Read: "Otherwise time coupled with space gives you spacetime...". Now replace "space" with "nothing" in the previous sentence. Still gibberish?

Yes, that is still gibberish.

[talanum1 (OP)]

Space existing doesn't mean that space "points" must exist. If space turns out to be quantized, then that would suggest that there aren't dimensionless points anywhere.

I mean with "point" a quantum of space.

Yes, that is still gibberish.

You just don't want to accept the logical argument and conclusion.

[Origin]

You just don't want to accept the logical argument and conclusion.

"time coupled with nothing gives you spacetime..." is not a logical argument, it is a statement with no evidence.  Gibberish is a reasonable description of your statement.

[Bored chemist]

You just don't want to accept the logical argument

You haven't got close to presenting one.

[Origin]

Quote from: Kryptid
Okay, how much energy should be missing?

Four space point's worth of. I don't know how much energy is in a space point.

Holy crap, that's priceless...

[Kryptid]

You just don't want to accept the logical argument and conclusion.

So if it was determined that there wasn't missing energy in the Pi-minus decay, would that be a falsification of your model?

[talanum1 (OP)]

So if it was determined that there wasn't missing energy in the Pi-minus decay, would that be a falsification of your model?

Yes. It would mean structure is not conserved. It would be a sad state and I won't be able to wrap my head around it.

[Bored chemist]

So if it was determined that there wasn't missing energy in the Pi-minus decay, would that be a falsification of your model?

Yes. It would mean structure is not conserved. It would be a sad state and I won't be able to wrap my head around it.

I have bad news for you.