Naked Science Forum

On the Lighter Side => New Theories => Topic started by: imetheman on 17/08/2017 23:54:45

Title: Could this model of physical reality represent the TOE?
Post by: imetheman on 17/08/2017 23:54:45
This video represents the introduction to the theory of everything. I have been working on this most of my life. I have realised for a couple of years that the theory was indeed correct, but have spent the last 2 years trying to disprove it. My studies however have only served to strengthen my convictions on the validity of the theory.

It transpires that the truth is far more wonderful than any fiction which could be imagined by any artist.
One of the profound conclusions reached by the theory is that it transpires that the ultimate and only motive force for everything which exists in the observable universe is through the application of conscious free will - of which, all living moving organisms possess.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src=" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Title: Re: Could this model of physical reality represent the TOE?
Post by: Bogie_smiles on 21/08/2017 15:06:03
Can you post a transcript of the video, or a link to a video with captions?
Title: Re: Could this model of physical reality represent the TOE?
Post by: imetheman on 22/08/2017 12:54:26
Hi Bogie. Unfortunately, I don't have a full transcript of the video but shall put a synopsis of the main conclusions of the theory together on Word & paste it on here soon.
Title: Re: Could this model of physical reality represent the TOE?
Post by: Bogie_smiles on 22/08/2017 13:24:06
While waiting, I viewed your posts and other threads, and have gotten a better idea of it. If you post a synopsis, or a cut and paste, I will give it a look though.
Title: Re: Could this model of physical reality represent the TOE?
Post by: guest4091 on 22/08/2017 16:23:58
One of the profound conclusions reached by the theory is that it transpires that the ultimate and only motive force for everything which exists in the observable universe is through the application of conscious free will - of which, all living moving organisms possess.
Before any conscious free will, how did the universe work, and what is the source of the conscious free will?
Title: Re: Could this model of physical reality represent the TOE?
Post by: Bogie_smiles on 22/08/2017 18:30:11
Free will, consciousness ... do they emerge, or have they always existed? Was there a beginning to the universe, or has it always existed? Is there an explanation for the existence of the universe, like "something from nothing" or "God did it", or "it has always existed"? Do you think a TOE should address those issues?
Title: Re: Could this model of physical reality represent the TOE?
Post by: imetheman on 22/08/2017 18:56:07
In light of the replies posted so far, I am unclear whether the link to the video which I have posted on youtube is available to other forum members. I can see the link is available on my own page but not sure if it is the same for visitors to the post?
Title: Re: Could this model of physical reality represent the TOE?
Post by: Bogie_smiles on 22/08/2017 19:42:35
In light of the replies posted so far, I am unclear whether the link to the video which I have posted on youtube is available to other forum members. I can see the link is available on my own page but not sure if it is the same for visitors to the post?
To clear that up, yes, I was able to view the video. I'm hearing impaired and I had trouble picking up the exact words from the speaker (is that you?), so a cut and paste would help.
Title: Re: Could this model of physical reality represent the TOE?
Post by: imetheman on 24/08/2017 23:29:21
The synopsis of the main conclusions reached by the theory are as follows:

The fundamental natural rest state of the universe at the scale of the Planck length is one of total equilibrium.  The equilibrium is corrupted when the distance between any 2 given coordinates in 3 dimensional space is changed [by any distance greater than 1 Planck length] through the application of an external 3rd force acting on either 1 of the 2 coordinates.  The change in distance [corruption of the equilibrium] between any 2 given coordinates is described as either acceleration or deceleration over any given period of time.

The direction of potential corruption between any 2 coordinates follows a notional line of trajectory which is exactly 180 degrees between the centres of both notional Planck spheres. The corruption occurs in 2 dimensions only. [See illustration].




Whenever the equilibrium of any 2 notional Planck spheres is corrupted, it results in the instantaneous creation of 'an event' at a newly created coordinate. The new coordinate  represents the creation of an infinite point singularity in 3-D space. The singularity also represents time zero of the subsequent Planck radiation which is 'emitted' outward from the notional centre.

Planck radiation is defined as consecutive notional spheres which expand outward from the singularity at a rate of 1 Planck length every 1 Planck second.  After a period of 1 Planck second after the creation of the event [time zero], the Planck radiation has expanded to a notional sphere having a diameter of 1 Planck length. After a period of 2 Planck secs. represents a notional Planck sphere having a diameter of 3 Planck lengths, after 3 PS = sphere with a diameter of 5PL, 4PS = 7PL sphere, 5PS = 9PL ….........The diameter of each successive sphere increases by 2 Planck lengths every Planck second and so on ad infinitum.

This ratio of ever increasing Planck lengths of consecutive spheres to Planck seconds constitutes the prime source equation of the Planck constant and therefore also determines the values of all the cosmological physical constants. The quantisation of matter and energy at the Planck scale is explained by the fact that any relative acceleration/deceleration of any given coordinate which is less than 1 Planck length over a period of 1 Planck second cannot be measured or known in this universe -  this fact equates to the truth and veracity of the statement that no information can travel faster than the speed of light. All matter is therefore created moment to moment in synchronicity with the 1 Planck second pulses of the Planck radiation.

Furthermore, although the movement of a Planck sphere coordinate of matter by an external 3rd force [and therefore the creation of an event singularity at a new coordinate] is instantaneous, the information that an event has been created at the new coordinate is delayed by the amount equal to the amount of Planck seconds which it takes to form the particular Planck sphere diameter. So for instance if a Planck sphere of matter with a diameter of 9 Planck lengths is moved / accelerated by a relative distance of 1 Planck length, it takes 5 Planck secs.  to form the new 9 Planck length diameter sphere at the new coordinate in accordance with the PL to PS ratio of Planck radiation.
This delay / drag of information [of movement] over time, accounts for the relative density, mass, rest weight and inertia [ and therefore gravitational force acting on] all matter in 4 dimensional space.

The degree of force exerted by an external 3rd agent on any given coordinate can be exactly determined  by the measurement of the degree of corruption on the angle of equilibrium. This degree of corruption of the angle is instantly rectified by the first prime cosmological constant – the universe immediately 'snaps back' to equilibrium and the angle [and equilibrium] is instantly re-established. The amount of 'rectification' which is required in order to re-establish the angle of equilibrium at the new coordinate – the degree of 'snap back' – is therefore exactly equal to the degree of corruption of the angle caused by the external 3rd force. Therefore the 'energy in' which is applied by the 3rd force – which can be described as a negative charge - is exactly equal to the opposing 'energy out' positive charge of the law of equilibrium. The particular equation which determines the 'energy in' equals 'energy out' arrangement [ in relation  to the degree of corruption of the angle of equilibrium] will be found to be the source of the value of the fine structure constant.

The movement of the coordinates of matter is of course relativistic. As such, the instantaneousness of the 'snapping back' to equilibrium mentioned above, is relative to the degree of movement of the coordinate at the Planck scale. For instance, the gravitational influence of the movement of the  Orion constellation on other more distant galaxies will encounter a relative 'instantaneous' snapping back to equilibrium lasting many hundreds if not thousands of years.

The final metaphysical conclusion of the theory relates to the fact that there is a physical action which occurs at the Planck scale in 3–D space which can only be performed by a living organism. This physical action results in a specific event which can therefore only occur within the living tissue of a living organism and nowhere else in the universe. This [entirely unpredictable] particular physical manoeuvre necessarily involves the application of the free will of the organism which performs this physical action.

This unique event occurs at the Planck scale within the living tissue of a living organism when it  intentionally moves a part of it's body in a direction which is exactly 180 degrees opposite from the direction it was previously moving – and by 'previously' I mean 1 Planck second ago in the past. Without going into the details of the mechanics involved at the Planck scale, the general principle is that a coordinate which exists in the present becomes 'occupied' by an event which was created in the past and also by an event which was created in the future. This situation results in the creation of an entirely new singularity - where the Planck length ( and therefore the Planck constant ) is out of synchronicity with the specific and unique Planck constant of the physical universe in which the living organism who created the singularity exists.

This unique singularity represents the Big Bang of an entirely new and separate physical universe. The Planck constant of this new universe is entirely determined by the 180 degree 'return' velocity – or degree of energy - which has been applied by the living organism which performed the action and created the event/singularity. As with all events at the Planck scale, the expansion of the Planck radiation from the moment of it's creation [and out into infinity] conforms with the PS to PL ratio as already described.  The ratio of time to sphere diameter of Planck radiation [immediately just after the creation of the singularity] accurately explains the inflationary period of the early universe.

Ultimately the only conclusion which can be inferred from this fact is that the singularity which was created at the beginning of our own observable universe was of itself, could only have been created by a living organism. It is only by accepting that this is indeed the case that the mystery of the cause of the Big Bang singularity is resolved. As such the similarity between the gossamer like structures of both the recently released large scale image of the universe and that of the microscopic image of the neurological pathways present in the nervous system of living tissue, is no coincidence.

Our universe was created within an already expanding space-time. That the living organism which created our own observable universe exists in it's own relative 'parent' universe, also explains why the expansion of our own universe is accelerating. The fact that our region of the cosmos is being drawn in a specific direction towards a 'Great Attractor' is explained by the theory by the fact that the latter represents a relative local massive particle in the parent universe of the living organism which created the Big Bang of our own universe.

In conclusion the prime [and only possible] motive force which creates the Big Bang of every newly created physical universe -including ours- is the application of the conscious free will of the living organism who created it. 
Title: Re: Could this model of physical reality represent the TOE?
Post by: Bogie_smiles on 24/08/2017 23:39:28
Thank you for posting that synopsis. I'll read and comment.
Title: Re: Could this model of physical reality represent the TOE?
Post by: Bogie_smiles on 25/08/2017 00:35:28
My first comment is not a serious one, but in your universe, we would have to be careful what we think :) .


I’m going to consider all of the discussion about the coordinate system (is it called the Planckian Coordinate System?; maybe Plankian Spacetime?), as axiomatic, i.e., given and necessary for the derived conclusions to be true. Therefore, we can go right to the discussion of:


Ultimately the only conclusion which can be inferred from this fact is that the singularity which was created at the beginning of our own observable universe was of itself, could only have been created by a living organism. It is only by accepting that this is indeed the case that the mystery of the cause of the Big Bang singularity is resolved. As such the similarity between the gossamer like structures of both the recently released large scale image of the universe and that of the microscopic image of the neurological pathways present in the nervous system of living tissue, is no coincidence.
Note that I am accepting your invocation of the Singularity as in Big Bang Theory, as given, and that does not imply that it is my own personal view. My initial question is about a multiverse that is implied as I read the synopsis. Do you include the Many Worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics in your TOE, or am I wrong to think that every event, as you describe an event, is the work of a conscious mind, and therefore each event initiates a new “Singularity” in the multiverse?
Title: Re: Could this model of physical reality represent the TOE?
Post by: imetheman on 25/08/2017 02:47:04
 Do your include the Many Worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics in your TOE, or am I wrong to think that every event, as you describe an event, is the work of a conscious mind, and therefore each event initiates a new “Singularity” in the multiverse?

With regard to 'being careful what you think', this humorous observation is more profound than you perhaps realise. But in explaining why this is so it would divert from replying to your main question so I'll explain why this is so some other time.

'Planckian Coordinate System' - I like it. You are correct in assuming that it is indeed axiomatic (however you describe it).
Every 'event' is caused by the acceleration or deceleration of one of any two given coordinates of matter in 3- D space. Also, every event creates Planck radiation as a consequence of the disruption of the equilibrium. The creation of every event / singularity, can ultimately be traced back to the fact that life ( and by implication living moving organisms ) exists throughout the universe.  More importantly however, is the fact that all living organisms possess free will. Without the ability to intentionally move and change direction in 3-D space in response to changes in the environment, life would not have evolved at all.
This ability to intentionally move in 3-D space is the working definition of free will in respect of the model.
However, not every event [ Planck radiation] which is created results in the creation of a Big Bang ( and therefore a new physical universe).  For instance, consider a pen lying motionless on a table. It consists of inanimate matter. Every atom of which the pen is made, (whilst it remains unaffected by any external 3rd force) exists in equilibrium with every other 'pen atom'. Thus no events [Planck radiation] are created between any 2 pen atoms. However, travelling at a fixed velocity on the surface of the Earth as they orbit around the axis, every pen atom at any given moment in time is either accelerating or decelerating relative to the Moon, Sun, Solar system, etc. An event (Planck radiation) is created  between each pen atom and all of the rest of the cosmos.

However, at no time does any atom of which the pen is comprised [nor any other inanimate particle of matter] reverse it's movement / trajectory in a direction which is 180 degrees opposite from that which it was moving 1 Planck second ago so as to create a new physical universe. Only living organisms can perform this entirely unpredictable manoeuvre. And it is only because living organisms possess free will that they are capable of performing this manoeuvre at all.   
 
Title: Re: Could this model of physical reality represent the TOE?
Post by: imetheman on 25/08/2017 13:41:28
Before any conscious free will, how did the universe work, and what is the source of the conscious free will?
Hopefully I have answered your question in my latest post.
Title: Re: Could this model of physical reality represent the TOE?
Post by: Bogie_smiles on 25/08/2017 14:30:13
Actually, I mean that comment about, “being careful what you think”, more seriously than I let on. In the depths of my own personal philosophy, which I derive from my individual views of the cosmology of the universe, human thought can be a “force” under various circumstances that I won’t go into on your thread.


I cannot dispute with you the significance of the thoughts of self-aware, intelligent, free-willed individuals. I would consider it the height of the evolutionary process that individuals reach that awareness, and begin to work with it in our own circumstances. Perhaps I will eventually be posting about my own philosophy elsewhere on NS as it fits into my other postings, so we might talk about that then, but in the mean time, I will follow along with your ideas about a TOE.