0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
If you think this is not true can you explain why radio waves are not a source of black energy ?
I can also ask why radio waves are not a source of visible energy ?
If you add them to the visible energy, you are going to find no black energy anymore.
I don't think there is anything else, other than excitations in the EM filed. The unknown gravitational effects are generated by these fields.
Simulation of gravity should be done using olny EM fileds excitations not abstract concepts like charge.
In your deviation from Relativity what is the mechanism for EM excitation?
Einstein had difficulty explaining GR effectively because he did not have the tools needed. The MMX stripped him of those tools. This left him with postulates to follow rather than a cause and affect. He understood motion in a type of Aether would invalidate relativity and he said as much. You cannot have motion and light being the same speed in all directions. But to get around that there is a simple explanation. A c spin type of Aether that actually causes Relativity. In GR mass actually increases the distance between the Aether spin particles causing clocks to reduce their tick rate while c remains constant. With the space increasing volume mass increases volume to match the frames tick rate. SR has the equivalence in a visual increase in the measuring stick. While vector velocity matches the measurement to the tick rate of the frames clock.
I don't agree with the idea of spin particles moving in relation to each other.My idea is that vacuum has the permeability and permittivity properties which are constant everywhere, thus c is constant in absolute space.
QuoteI don't agree with the idea of spin particles moving in relation to each other.My idea is that vacuum has the permeability and permittivity properties which are constant everywhere, thus c is constant in absolute space.Physics could care less weather we agree or not. Your statement is circular reasoning.This follows religion and not real science. Why is space permeability constant? You are just making the case for Einstein's light being constant postulate. No cause for it being constant.It is the cause for which we are striving. Quantum mechanics if not spin for electron motionwhy do the electrons move? This is what needs explaining. Why is the photon constant is not explained by saying it has constant permeability.
A constant permittivity/permeability
Einstein intuition was good when he said there is no defitite motion of matter because that is what experiments were showing. However, I think there must be an aether or a physical matrix if you want, which can be called Electromagnetic Aether.