[Mike Gale]

One second per second is not a tautology because my seconds are not necessarily the same as yours. The speed of my clock from your perspective is the ratio of my second to your second. That's the easy part of (special) relativity. The mind bender is that, if you perceive my seconds to be shorter than yours, I must perceive your seconds to be shorter than mine. Until you get your head around that concept, you will be lost in space.

[guest39538]

One second per second is not a tautology because my seconds are not necessarily the same as yours. The speed of my clock from your perspective is the ratio of my second to your second. That's the easy part of (special) relativity. The mind bender is that, if you perceive my seconds to be shorter than yours, I must perceive your seconds to be shorter than mine. Until you get your head around that concept, you will be lost in space.

I will say one sentence to help you understand.

Your smallest measurement of distance and time elapsed can only ever be equal to my smallest measurement of distance and time elapsed no matter where we are relative to each other in the Universe.

 

[kah-len]

This is my new theory...

A chronon is the length of time it takes one quantum of energy to push one electron from one electronic orbit to the next.

Time is measured by the chronon in this 3rd dimensional reality and I will try to explain this the best way I can.
Please correct me if I'm wrong. I am not a mathematician so please bear with me...

How I see that space-time really works is this...

Every second that you live your life, is like a radio frequency..

say at your birth the frequency was 1.00001 on the dial. At age 1 day, the frequency is now 103,680.00001 (in seconds)
× 365 = 37,843,200.00001 (seconds) on the dial and every second of each and every moment and there are even more slices of time-frequencies in between those milliseconds as well such as 365000.45332455554333999
etc... each millisecond has its own slice of time frequency that stands still and we continue the moving picture stills or "pages" of time slices.

Each and every number is a time-slice or frequency of that moment.
The very day you were born still exists as a frequency set to 1.00001 (if that was also the beginning of all time) and you can go back there by setting the frequency to that time.

In reality, time would be in the range of septillionths since the big bang would be considered the 0.000001 slice.

The earliest calculation some 47 trillion years ago, If you take into effect the speed of light from the time of creation.
(Billy Albert Meier had calculated the half life of the speed of light and from that he measured closest to the exact time of the big bang including the 7 hyperspaces it created.)

0 Being the actual point of explosion 1 being the explosion and -1 being the implosion.

Time travel itself would be compared to changing the radio dial to the frequency or number of time slices that were created. Because we cannot know the exact time of the big bang to calculate, we would have to work backwards from this time and get approximates within the milliseconds.

To travel in time, you need to use the frequencies smaller then the chronon and that is where the tachyons come in.
They travel billions of times the speed of light.. The sub-neutrinos could be used as a carrier to transmit the signal to the past or the future.

Everything is frequency!
Brain waves do travel outside the body and thought is a particle that travels faster than light.

Forget about the 24hr clock and think of it as linear time. Each separate multiverse has its time line traveling in the same direction and speed as our own but sometimes the frequency of 2 or 3 want to share the same band wave and they cross each other like a double or triple helix causing what is known as the Mandela effect.

Thoughts anyone???

[guest39538]

This is my new theory...

Time is measured by the chronon in this 3rd dimensional reality and I will try to explain this the best way I can.
Please correct me if I'm wrong. I am not a mathematician so please bear with me...

How I see that space-time really works is this...

Every second that you live your life, is like a radio frequency..

I like people who think for themselves, well done on having an idea of your own.  However let me show you something.

Imagine your radio frequencies being removed fromt he space they pass through , remove all the radiation, in your imagine you should now just see a 2d plane of darkness, i.e absolute space.

I now want you to re-add the radio waves/light. You now should see Minkowski space-time.  Time being that of c constant.

However take note of the 2d plane,  note that time exists for the plane although it is timeless.

Also take note that time is measured relative to the 2d plane that always stays at 0.


Before the big bang there was nothing of the imagination but this 2d plane of darkness. 0 dimensions was never the beginning, 0 dimensions is the lack of light or sight if you like.

[GoC]

A BH of 17 billion suns could not be produced in 13 billion years. Our suns life cycle will be about 10 billion years. Mathematically a 13.6 billion year old universe is lying about its age. We cannot use our limit of technology to distinguish images as a limit of the universe itself. That is actually ludicrous. 

[kah-len]

I like people who think for themselves, well done on having an idea of your own.  However let me show you something.

Imagine your radio frequencies being removed fromt he space they pass through , remove all the radiation, in your imagine you should now just see a 2d plane of darkness, i.e absolute space.

I now want you to re-add the radio waves/light. You now should see Minkowski space-time.  Time being that of c constant.

I am thinking though.. What if the big bang wasn't just an explosion but also an implosion as well making the 0 being the actual event and the expansion being the +1 and implosion being the -1
The universe would also have possibly a black whole in the central core being the -1

[guest39538]

I like people who think for themselves, well done on having an idea of your own.  However let me show you something.

Imagine your radio frequencies being removed fromt he space they pass through , remove all the radiation, in your imagine you should now just see a 2d plane of darkness, i.e absolute space.

I now want you to re-add the radio waves/light. You now should see Minkowski space-time.  Time being that of c constant.

I am thinking though.. What if the big bang wasn't just an explosion but also an implosion as well making the 0 being the actual event and the expansion being the +1 and implosion being the -1
The universe would also have possibly a black whole in the central core being the -1

The big bang is not an explosion as such. However I do agree before the event of the big bang there was firstly an ''implosion''.
However we can look at this ''implosion'' to be the first existence of G (gravity), Isotropic centripetal force. Try to imagine several points on a virtual inflated balloons surface centripetally at the same time being drawn to a central point, however the difficulty is to determine what these points or whole of point 0E is. 

[GoC]

What is your basis of a BB if you cannot relate it to 13.6 billion years? The theory has no footing except in peoples minds. BH's prove the universe we observe has to be much older than 13 billion years old

[guest39538]

I have the answer to my own questions

The speed of ''time'' we presently use is directly relative to the speed of the Earth's rotation.

If we evolved else where in the beginning and devised the measurement of time in the same way, our ''speed'' of time would be directly relative to the rotational speed of the ''new'' planet we evolved on, being either a faster ''speed'' of time or a slower ''speed' of time relative to where we devised time.

[guest39538]

I repeat:

It is interesting that any measurement after 0t becomes instantaneous history no matter what the speed/rate of equivalent ''time''measurement  being used.   This logic alone overwhelmingly over ruling such premise as time dilation, yet you all still choose to ignore the best scientific mind this world has ever seen.

[Demolitiondaley]

I repeat:

It is interesting that any measurement after 0t becomes instantaneous history no matter what the speed/rate of equivalent ''time''measurement  being used.   This logic alone overwhelmingly over ruling such premise as time dilation, yet you all still choose to ignore the best scientific mind this world has ever seen.

Who is "the best scientific mind this world has ever seen"?

[guest39538]

I repeat:

It is interesting that any measurement after 0t becomes instantaneous history no matter what the speed/rate of equivalent ''time''measurement  being used.   This logic alone overwhelmingly over ruling such premise as time dilation, yet you all still choose to ignore the best scientific mind this world has ever seen.

Who is "the best scientific mind this world has ever seen"?

Of course I refer to myself, no more being humble from me, its time for ''hard balling'', I have been very nice trying to get people to listen and discuss, I know my ''stuff'' and it is about time science listened instead of being arrogant.

My premise on time is unbreakable. Please feel free to try to break it.