0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Space exists, and appears to be completely transparent and colorless...I don't see how that means that we can observe distance.
The defense accepts that light is "clear" and maintains that it has never claimed otherwise.
I'm really not sure what you mean. You can see the light if it goes in your eye. You don't see it if it does not, and barring any extreme conditions, the light will also not influence any of the other light entering your eye...
The defense accepts that light is "clear" and maintains that it has never claimed otherwis
Speaking as a witness, I can confirm that I saw no light exit the eye. Not from my own, nor anyone else's.
The prosecution as not mentioned exit and acknowledges light has to enter your eyes to see, but the prosecution has strong evidence that we observe light as a whole , not observing single particle Photons, the defense clearly admitting observed clear light in space.
If light went into your eye as a whole, there would be no light left outside.
Quote from: Thebox on 17/02/2016 21:47:23The prosecution as not mentioned exit and acknowledges light has to enter your eyes to see, but the prosecution has strong evidence that we observe light as a whole , not observing single particle Photons, the defense clearly admitting observed clear light in space.Well, to say so, that is quite absurd. If light went into your eye as a whole, there would be no light left outside.
Quote from: timey on 17/02/2016 22:51:59 If light went into your eye as a whole, there would be no light left outside.That's a good point, is that why it's dark outside?I see it clear now, I finally see the light. All else is dark.
Can the prosecution put the first accusation to rest in agreement that we now agree about the clear light.?
Light which passes across our field of vision cannot enter our eyes and so is not detected.
Judging by your response, you have either not read my post or you have misunderstood it. Just to help you on your way.Why do you refer to a single photon when talking about the sun?Let's expand on your bullet analogy. As someone said, think machine gun. I once spoke to a gunner who had experience of shooting down aircraft, he said the best technique was to fire the machine gun ahead of the target and hold that position until the aircraft ran through the burst. Remember also the sun fires out photons in all direction, it doesn't need to aim at anything!Bullets and photons.Yes, the bullet follows a curved path, but from which point of view? Shooter, bullet or target.It isn't due to spacetime curvature, and the curve (purple) you've draw is wrong way round, it goes ahead of the redirect line at first.Don't reply to this in your usual knee jerk reaction. Take some time to really think through the situation and try to think how it all works.Also, forget 'clear light', it isn't helping you understand any of this, it's just adding to your confusion.
Quote from: Colin2B on 18/02/2016 00:20:54Quote from: timey on 17/02/2016 22:51:59 If light went into your eye as a whole, there would be no light left outside.That's a good point, is that why it's dark outside?I see it clear now, I finally see the light. All else is dark.Great lines lol
May it please the court;The defense accuses the prosecution of being culpable in a conflict of interest. As said prosecutor has demonstrated his ignorance of, and instigated attacks on "The Standard Model". His agenda has proved to have displayed no allegiance regarding the interests of the state, but rather his own personal ego. And submitting precious little more than his personal point of view, he has supplied us with absolutely no forensic evidence whatsoever. The defense calls for a mistrial and recommends:Taking these facts into deliberation, I ask for a show of hands. What say the court?1. Should we reprimand the prosecutor for this conflict of interest?2. Should he be brought up for charges, before a board of inquiry by peer review, for a possible disbarment?3. Or should we expedite matters and drag him from the court room and toss him in jail?If it please the court, grant our twelve jurors this decision.A recess is declared until deliberations have concluded.