1
New Theories / Re: Is there a better way to explain light?
« on: 13/11/2022 16:05:30 »At present we are of the opinion that space is empty. Who is we. I’m not aware of anyone who thinks space is empty.
However, the fact that space contains things does not explain diffraction as you claimIt is not clear what is being curved.
It is clear to anyone who has studied physics.
We measure spacetime by using rulers for distance and clocks for time. Newton assumed that those rulers and clocks would show the same distance and time throughout the universe, but Einstein showed that this is not a correct assumption. In some circumstances the differences in the measurements are best described by a curvature of spacetime.Ok, in case if it is energy and it is from the mass, in such case mass is independent and it can stay anywhere in the universe.This statement doesn’t make any sense. Mass is not independent of the energy stored within it, neither is the energy that can be released independent of the mass. E=mc2.
Thank you. I am also saying that space is not empty and it is completely filled with aether. Basic question is how to find out this aether. As per Classical view of light is that it is a disturbance in space.
It is the electrons that are released into space are causing EMR or light or in fact a disturbance. It is creating vibrations in the space. What I would like to say that, electrons released by us are charging particles in the space.
It is the space fabric that is being curved or distorted in space. I did not said anything about measurement of distance.
Then, space fabric is nothing but aether only.
Any discussion gives an opportunity to learn
The following users thanked this post: Zer0