1

New Theories / Re: Do mechanical vibrations of atoms expend energy?

« on: 03/06/2023 23:33:35 »

So asking a question in regards to my patent which I'm about to let expire, it was granted in Canada. Anyhoo the idea was if you recall to bury a cannon 500 feet deep, shoot the balls up to the surface into a loop on the ground, take them out and lower them in an elevator. The cons of the system are converting hydrogen fuel, elevator's currently are 60 70% efficient, the pros are for the enviroment. 50% of the energy of an explosion iss converted into blast energy which is further divided into seismic, sound, and weight displacement. None of that hurts the atmosphere. The other 50% is heat that mostle stays deep in the ground. Some hotshot mentioned that the heat would eventually make its way to the surface and into the atmosphere.

So my question is how well known is it that vibrations of the atom is what causes heat? Is it just an effect of heat passing through a substance? Wouldn't some of the energy from the canon to the surface be lost, if not all of it, through mechanical vibrations of the atoms?

What is the point of your 'patent'?

2

New Theories / Re: Why is the sky blue?

« on: 31/05/2023 22:24:49 »

Could be that the sun is wrong and more colors would be appropriate, making you wrong,wrong again, making the sun mad.

Oh, and why post nonsense like the above, unless of course you arec8 years old.

3

New Theories / Re: Why is the sky blue?

« on: 31/05/2023 22:22:52 »

The speed of light is thought to be a result of the background temperature of the aether.

By who?

4

New Theories / Re: Why is the sky blue?

« on: 31/05/2023 14:45:32 »

Why is the sky blue? Anyone will tell you about the atmosphere 'scattering' light, I propose this for arguement.
The light of a star red shifts and blue shifts in accordance with its movement towards or away from you. If you compare the effects of momentum on an object to the effect of a gravity field, then the light entering a gravity field would blue shift and hence the sky is blue!

I have noticed with posters like you, that when there is an explanation for a phenomenom that has been demonstrated countless times, you always go off and try to propose a different, far more complex explanation. I suspect that this is because you do not find a rational explanation 'exciting' enough and try to shoehorn some nonsense that you perceive as being a lot more exotic and sexy. It merely displays your lack of understanding about science and opens you up to justified ridicule. Why do it?

5

New Theories / Re: Newest Quantum Gravity and Theory of Everything, TOE

« on: 31/05/2023 14:09:06 »

The sizes of quarks or electrons are about 10^-20 m, to the Planck length it is 15 orders of magnitude, and I assumed these sizes for particles from the galactical model.

The galactic model that you made up? Also, where did you get the size in planck length of quarks and electrons? You do know that they are different particles with different sizes?

6

New Theories / Re: Newest Quantum Gravity and Theory of Everything, TOE

« on: 29/05/2023 13:59:20 »

How did you arrive at that number?

In the three models galactical, cosmical and supercosmical the distances are of the order of 15 powers, so from the last value of 10^-65 I subtracted 15 and got 10^-80.

What models? Ones that you made up?

7

New Theories / Re: Newest Quantum Gravity and Theory of Everything, TOE

« on: 28/05/2023 14:27:22 »

In the previous version of a similar thread, I tried to use the concept of God, but eventually I returned to atheistic positions

No you didn't. You kept posting religious ramblings until the post was locked.

8

New Theories / Re: Photo of subtle body, photo of soul, photo of astral body

« on: 18/05/2023 13:27:07 »

This thread should be closed. The OP is not discussing anything with a scientific basis, it is just spiritulism.

9

New Theories / Re: Solving the puzzle (problem) of Quantum Gravity and Theory of Everything, TOE

« on: 17/05/2023 19:39:26 »

In the first generation of particles (see Galactical model of subquark particles https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=86090.0), space changes state and creates matter. These particles are actually made of space, only space in an altered state. Gravitons are made of space. This space in the case of gravitons is in an altered state (this also applies to particles at a level close to the level of gravitons that build matter). Gravitons are bulges of space. Due to the curvature of space, they acquire an attractive charge. These are the basics of Quantum Gravity

Two theories which modern physics is based on is the general theory of relativity (GR) and quantum mechanics (QM). GR refers to great phenomena in cosmic scales, where gravity works. QM refers to phenomena in microscale, relates to particles and interactions. Years of research have shown that these two theories work well in experiments. On the other hand they are incompatible with each other. This inconsistency is revealed in very much small scale, Planck scale. To solve it, one should discover the theory showing a deeper reality, it will be the TOE, explaining all phenomena in the universe.
The TOE, it will be a concept where space, actually God creates matter. And more specifically the square microgrid of space, 10^-65 m in size creates matter. This is similar to earlier computer simulations, where the simulation grids gave images of three-dimensional objects. This microgrid is like a mental simulation, and it is. This is a mental simulation in the mind of God. The basis for matter is square microgrid of space sizes in the order of 10^-65 m. The proper theory of everything is that the ultimate basis of everything is God (However, not Christ who is the being of the planetary system, the Sun and the Earth).
The concept of a square microgrid of space is probably compatible with the holographic concept, as this microgrid probably exists in two dimensions. Gravity would be the concave bending of this microgrid (see diagram), under the influence of its accumulation in the form of matter which it creates by twisting. Gravitons are formed directly from this microgrid, and through its concavity they acquire an attractive charge. Gravitons are bulges of the considered microgrid. Other particles from a level close to the level of gravitons hang from the considered microgrid as if on a string.



diagram. Represents gravity in two-dimensional space. The picture is closer to the truth than you might think. Gravity is actually the concavity of a two-dimensional square microgrid, of course this microgrid is much finer than shown in the image above.

author of text: Gregory Podgorniak, Poland, year 2023

This is theological musing and as such has nothing to do with science. I also note you reference on of your other threads, which was universally derided.

10

New Theories / Re: Photo of subtle body, photo of soul, photo of astral body

« on: 16/05/2023 14:00:59 »

it could be a hardware issue

What kind of hardware issue adds colour when only monochrome is present? You have demonstrated that not only are you gullible enough to believe all kinds of superstitious nonsense but that you also do not understand the photography that you claim is evidence. Do you relaise that this is a science site and nota general discussion for fairy tales?

11

New Theories / Re: Photo of subtle body, photo of soul, photo of astral body

« on: 16/05/2023 12:50:51 »

Photograph of the subtle body obtained using a special UV filter, the author of the photo probably was not aware of the obtained result. I discovered this photo by accident, by searching images of ultraviolet photography, around the year 2005. Colors are different than on photographs in visible light what is natural for UV photography. This photo is proof of the existence of the soul.

author of text: Gregory Podgorniak, Poland, year 2020

If it was photographed using a 'special' UV filter, why is there colour? A UV transmitting filter allows UV light to pass but blocks visible light and infrared. Hence ther picture would be black and white.

12

New Theories / Re: Grand Canyon Formation By Anti-matter

« on: 13/05/2023 09:50:46 »

"Also a meteor made from antimatter would not rotate from the earths magnetic field.  The magnetic field would effect an antimatter meteor the same as it would a matter meteor"
No, antimatter would spin backwards in a steady magnetic field and thus the antimatter magnoflux inertia energy stuff would annihilate the matter stuff kg for kg. 
Planetary matter stuff is made up of electromagnetic massless stuff contained in electron shells which allow it to slow down to become touchable negative material.

How to demonstrate that you have complete ignorance of geomorphological processes without explicitly stating it. Likewise, scientific method.

13

New Theories / Re: Photo of subtle body, photo of soul, photo of astral body

« on: 10/05/2023 17:58:51 »

Umm...c.p.u., Why is Nobody doing this then?
Any Thoughts.

Because I discovered it, I am the first.

Not the first to have delusional beliefs in 'spirituality' that have no place on a science site.

14

New Theories / Re: New theory of evolution

« on: 21/03/2023 15:50:42 »

What I would like to emphasize is each so called qualitative change, for example the transition of water into ice, or steam into water, is actually a cumulative quantitative change; that is, a quantitative change taking place quickly over a short period of time.

Word salad.

15

New Theories / Re: Biblical Flood

« on: 04/02/2023 18:24:35 »

So in your lifetime

No. I am glad not to live that long.

people will travel to Venus for some reason.

By the time the earth will freeze Venus could be ready for colonization. I can't find any other warm place to go.

Please just stop with this idiocy.

16

New Theories / Re: Biblical Flood

« on: 04/02/2023 12:10:09 »

In my theory the Hadean Eon should be placed before and the Archean Eon after the formation of the moon.

Just stop posting crap.

17

New Theories / Re: Structure of electrons, quarks and gluons, preon, preons

« on: 03/02/2023 11:27:31 »

Nonsense

This discovery is even greater than the Bohr model

It is not a discovery. It is just something you thought up AKA a brain fart.

18

New Theories / Re: New theory of social evolution and social structure

« on: 03/02/2023 11:26:10 »

ʃ Mathematics = Physics
ʃ Physics = Chemistry
ʃ Chemistry = Biology
ʃ Biology = History
ʃ History = Archeology
ʃ Archeology = Anthropology
ʃ Anthropology = Sociology
ʃ Sociology = Psychology
ʃ Psychology = Philosophy
ʃ Philosophy = Religion

Your point is?

It's fantasy that created humans. It's social interactions that made us discover the undiscovered. Christ had blood type of B-, and after Christ the blood type B (individualist type blood) was popular in Europe. That made the science grow. Also alchemy (originated from naive thinking about christianity - Christ prove on the Cross that one can have input on things one shouldn't have input on). Also Christ prove that against all other religions physical is profanum and spiritual is sacrum - so everyone might do disguisting things in science saying, the dignity factor was okay. And in XI-XIII century the roman Catholic Church stated the thing we now call system. And that was the basis for scientiffical method. Those things proove that We're getting somewhere - evolution is not blind, and there is a reason why we have both legs, armse, belly, back, neck and head. Humanoid is the highest form in the Universe.

p.s. I'm not saying Christ had kids. I'm saying it was a sign.

That word salad is utter nonsense. Blood type being due to popularity? Do you think people choose their blood type. Even by the standards of this section, this crap is a new low.

19

New Theories / Re: New theory of social evolution and social structure

« on: 03/02/2023 07:23:23 »

ʃ Mathematics = Physics
ʃ Physics = Chemistry
ʃ Chemistry = Biology
ʃ Biology = History
ʃ History = Archeology
ʃ Archeology = Anthropology
ʃ Anthropology = Sociology
ʃ Sociology = Psychology
ʃ Psychology = Philosophy
ʃ Philosophy = Religion

Your point is?

20

New Theories / Re: Biblical Flood

« on: 02/02/2023 20:11:20 »

My God Yahweh promised me a temple.

And what does belief in a fictional sky fairy have to do with science? No wonder you cannot provide evidence.