41
New Theories / Re: How does Hamdani explain the twins paradox?
« on: 25/02/2024 14:46:21 »
Back to experiment. We know that identical clocks are not synchronised when there is relative motion between them, and however we calculate it, they can remain synchronised if v = 0.
Most human experience involves v << c, so we have a "good enough" and specific concept of "twins" that actually has no general validity.
What paradox?
Most human experience involves v << c, so we have a "good enough" and specific concept of "twins" that actually has no general validity.
What paradox?
The following users thanked this post: paul cotter