Naked Science Forum
Non Life Sciences => Technology => Topic started by: donalcona on 29/10/2018 19:26:07
-
I know this is illegal and you dont condone this.
But most of electricity theft is using this method wherein they install ground rod, and replace their neutral to it, therefore bypassing the meter. In analog meters yes.
But will this still work with digital meters?
-
most of electricity theft is using this method
Is it?
-
Is it?
well based on what i have observed in our country yes.
-
Where are they doing this?
-
where? place or the circuit?
-
No the meter measures current in the live line, you could bypass this by removing the fuse on the incoming power line which is illegal and tapping in there the power company would soon notice a drop in your bill and investigate and then prosecute you for theft.
Even if you only stole a small amount of power a meter reader would notice that the wire securing the fuse in had been broken and unless you could give a good reason for doing it you would come under suspicion, don't do it !!
-
they install ground rod, and replace their neutral to it, therefore bypassing the meter
In my area, the electricity grid uses a technique called "multiple earthed neutral", where every house has a ground rod, which is attached to the neutral at the network side of the meter.
We also have core-balance relays, so any imbalance between active and neutral on the customer side of the circuit will shut off current to the circuit.
I think you live in Philippines (which has a long association with USA)?
I see that Philippines has a 220V 60Hz retail supply. If they use US-style 2-phase meters registering both the active and neutral current, then bypassing the neutral current to earth will halve the current registered by the meter (while making the voltage regulation in the house rather erratic).
I would expect that a single-phase meter (electromechanical or electronic) would be cheaper, and not susceptible to this hack.
-
Yes I considered the eccentric three phase/bi phase system used in the USA so I checked the time stamp of this correspondent and found it to be UTC which rules out the Philippines.
There is a procedure you could use to achieve this end but I will not publish it here.