0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I have no real idea what I am discussing here
Quote from: Thebox on 12/09/2017 19:56:08I have no real idea what I am discussing hereClearly.
permittivityˌpəːmɪˈtɪvɪti/SubmitnounPHYSICSthe ability of a substance to store electrical energy in an electric field.
"Epsilon" is the Greek letter ε (lower case) or Ε (upper case), and it usually makes a short "e" soundMathematicians and Physicists use ε for various purposes (including permittivity in physics and electrical engineering).- In reality, it can mean whatever you define it to mean- But if your definition is internally inconsistent, don't expect anyone to pay attention to your definitionSo please provide your definition, or a link to where you saw it used. PS: 1 = ∞ is already a contradiction, so don't hold your breath waiting for the accoladesPPS: Please phrase the title as a question, as per the site guidelines to which you agreed when you signed up...
1 = ∞ is already a contradiction
Quite provable (1 = ∞) isn't a contradiction. 1mm1cm1inch1yard1 meter 1 mile 1 ly
Quote from: tkadm30Quite provable (1 = ∞) isn't a contradiction. 1mm1cm1inch1yard1 meter 1 mile 1 lyThis seems to be ignoring the fact that the units are just as important as the actual numbers.1 inch is not equal to 1 yard (different units of length) In fact, 1 yard = 36 inches!1 inch is definitely not equal to 1 kilogram (different units: length vs mass) These cannot even be compared unless you refer to some conversion factor For example, in the metric system, 1 cubic centimeter of water weighs 1 gram (at a particular temperature & pressure) So the properties of water act as a conversion factorThis has not shown that 1 = ∞, even if you ignore the units.So lets ignore the fact that values are different (not "="), and try to generalise:- A finite amount of length in one units can be converted to a finite amount of length in different units*- But this has not showed how a finite amount of length in one units can be converted into an infinite amount of length in different units.So I am afraid that you haven't proven that "1 = ∞", and the contradiction still stands.*Assuming that they are measured in the same frame inertial of reference.- If they are in different frames of reference, some finite measure in length may appear to be a different finite length.- Relativity does have some infinities, but we have not run into any real infinities yet, because our finite energy sources don't let us reach infinite energies.
Thebox;Your fundamental mistake is, 'infinity' is not a number, but a condition or relation, 'without limit', i.e. it has no value.
I know infinite is not a number but 1 is infinite.
Quote from: TheBoxI know infinite is not a number but 1 is infinite.Sorry, but 1 is quite finite.It is the smallest non-zero integer.It has the condition of being finite, bounded (an integer between 0 and 2) and specific (1).So 1 does not equal infinity.
Quote from: evan_au on 14/09/2017 20:04:20Quote from: TheBoxI know infinite is not a number but 1 is infinite.Sorry, but 1 is quite finite.It is the smallest non-zero integer.It has the condition of being finite, bounded (an integer between 0 and 2) and specific (1).So 1 does not equal infinity.No, we can expand 1 from zero infinitely.
Quote from: Thebox on 15/09/2017 10:53:33Quote from: evan_au on 14/09/2017 20:04:20Quote from: TheBoxI know infinite is not a number but 1 is infinite.Sorry, but 1 is quite finite.It is the smallest non-zero integer.It has the condition of being finite, bounded (an integer between 0 and 2) and specific (1).So 1 does not equal infinity.No, we can expand 1 from zero infinitely.You are only redefining a different unit.
I am expanding 1 from 0 and the distance in my thoughts and mind
Quote from: Thebox on 17/09/2017 14:45:06I am expanding 1 from 0 and the distance in my thoughts and mindYou are failing to convey it to any other mind.
One or unity is a whole thing.
if something takes an infinite time to get ''somewhere'' then relatively its velocity is 0.