0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Any ideas? And how.
There is no requirement for a new theory to bear any particular degree of similarity to the old theory it is attempting to replace. It just needs to explain the existing data better than the old theory does and, more importantly, to be falsifiable and to have survived being falsified by critical experimentation. Reproducibility of those experimental results by independent groups is also important as is the statistical significance of those results.
It just needs to explain the existing data better than the old theory does
I try that and people say it is nonsense , oh well.
Quote from: Thebox on 02/07/2018 18:47:55I try that and people say it is nonsense , oh well.Your "explanations" typically took the form of bad maths or bad cartoons, and they didn't explain anything.It's because you are a useless troll.
I started a thread.