0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
You can give a link to this information.
Quote from: Yusup Hizirov on 24/03/2020 00:01:49There are no answers to the following questions:1. In the solar system, all eight planets revolve around the sun in the same plane.And around the core of the galaxy, stars rotate in several planes.2. Around the north and south poles of the sun, planets cannot rotate.And around the north and south poles of the galaxy, stars revolve.3. Above the north and south poles of the sun, planets cannot be located; they will fall on the sun.And above the poles of the galaxy, there are stars and do not fall.4. Do the orbits of stars intersect in round galaxies.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy http://www.astro.caltech.edu/ay1/Ay1_main.html1-3 are not questions, they are statements (mostly incorrect ones, at that).Quote1. In the solar system, all eight planets revolve around the sun in the same plane.No they don't. Each one has its orbit tilted relative to the Sun's equator at least a bit. If you include minor bodies like Pluto and comets, the degree of tilt is far more extreme. As a matter of fact, the trans-Neptunian objects 2014 LM28 and 2008 KV42 have orbital inclinations of 84.7 and 103.4 degrees, respectively. Neither has fallen onto the Sun, despite being in practically polar orbits.Generally speaking, the planets are close to the same plane because they all formed from the same original gas cloud.Quote from: Yusup Hizirov on 24/03/2020 00:01:492. Around the north and south poles of the sun, planets cannot rotate.2014 LM28 and 2008 KV42 disagree with you.Quote from: Yusup Hizirov on 24/03/2020 00:01:493. Above the north and south poles of the sun, planets cannot be located; they will fall on the sun.2014 LM28 and 2008 KV42 disagree with you.Quote from: Yusup Hizirov on 24/03/2020 00:01:494. Do the orbits of stars intersect in round galaxies.Due to the distances involved, you'd expect that to happen very, very rarely.
There are no answers to the following questions:1. In the solar system, all eight planets revolve around the sun in the same plane.And around the core of the galaxy, stars rotate in several planes.2. Around the north and south poles of the sun, planets cannot rotate.And around the north and south poles of the galaxy, stars revolve.3. Above the north and south poles of the sun, planets cannot be located; they will fall on the sun.And above the poles of the galaxy, there are stars and do not fall.4. Do the orbits of stars intersect in round galaxies.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy http://www.astro.caltech.edu/ay1/Ay1_main.html
1. In the solar system, all eight planets revolve around the sun in the same plane.
2. Around the north and south poles of the sun, planets cannot rotate.
3. Above the north and south poles of the sun, planets cannot be located; they will fall on the sun.
4. Do the orbits of stars intersect in round galaxies.
There are no answers to the following questions:1. Stars hang above the poles of the galaxy?a) Without a doubt, this is levitation and contradicts elementary logic.b) Whether the planet can hang motionless, above the pole of the sun. http://www.astro.caltech.edu/ay1/Ay1_main.html2. In the solar system, all eight planets revolve around the sun in the same plane.a) And the stars, revolving around the nucleus of the galaxy, form dozens of planes.b) What force is involved in the formation of the lenticular shape of the galaxy.c) Within the laws of celestial mechanics, stars can rotate around the core of the galaxy, only in one plane, similar to the planets of the solar system.d) Do the orbits of stars intersect in irregular and other galaxies?3. Around the north and south poles of the sun, planets will not be able to rotate.a) And around the poles of the galaxy stars rotate.4. The claim that globular star clusters revolve around spiral galaxies also goes beyond celestial mechanics. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globular_cluster
There are no answers to the following questions:
Quote from: Yusup Hizirov on 23/02/2020 11:49:26There are no answers to the following questions:1. Stars hang above the poles of the galaxy?a) If it is levitation, then how does it work.b) Whether the planet can hang motionless, above the pole of the sun. http://www.astro.caltech.edu/ay1/Ay1_main.html2. Stars revolving around the galactic nucleus form dozens of planes.a) What force prevents the stars from spinning around the galactic core in one plane.b) What force is involved in the formation of the lenticular shape of the galaxy.c) Within the laws of celestial mechanics, stars can rotate around the galactic nucleus in only one plane, similar to the planets of the solar system.d) In the solar system, all eight planets revolve around the sun in one plane.e) Do the orbits of stars intersect in irregular and other galaxies.f) Like the stars of the galaxy, objects of the solar system can theoretically rotate around the equator and the meridian, forming dozens of planes, and in practice, they will quickly collide with each other.4. The claim that globular star clusters revolve around spiral galaxies also goes beyond celestial mechanics.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globular_clusterFor globular star clusters to rotate around the center of the galaxy, the galaxy itself must rotate around the center, and not be in free flight.
There are no answers to the following questions:1. Stars hang above the poles of the galaxy?a) If it is levitation, then how does it work.b) Whether the planet can hang motionless, above the pole of the sun. http://www.astro.caltech.edu/ay1/Ay1_main.html2. Stars revolving around the galactic nucleus form dozens of planes.a) What force prevents the stars from spinning around the galactic core in one plane.b) What force is involved in the formation of the lenticular shape of the galaxy.c) Within the laws of celestial mechanics, stars can rotate around the galactic nucleus in only one plane, similar to the planets of the solar system.d) In the solar system, all eight planets revolve around the sun in one plane.e) Do the orbits of stars intersect in irregular and other galaxies.f) Like the stars of the galaxy, objects of the solar system can theoretically rotate around the equator and the meridian, forming dozens of planes, and in practice, they will quickly collide with each other.4. The claim that globular star clusters revolve around spiral galaxies also goes beyond celestial mechanics.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globular_cluster
Quote from: Yusup Hizirov on 23/02/2020 11:49:26There are no answers to the following questions:1. Stars hang above the poles of the galaxy?a) Without a doubt, this is levitation and contradicts elementary logic.b) Whether the planet can hang motionless, above the pole of the sun. http://www.astro.caltech.edu/ay1/Ay1_main.html2. In the solar system, all eight planets revolve around the sun in the same plane.a) And the stars, revolving around the nucleus of the galaxy, form dozens of planes.b) What force is involved in the formation of the lenticular shape of the galaxy.c) Within the laws of celestial mechanics, stars can rotate around the core of the galaxy, only in one plane, similar to the planets of the solar system.d) Do the orbits of stars intersect in irregular and other galaxies?3. Around the north and south poles of the sun, planets will not be able to rotate.a) And around the poles of the galaxy stars rotate.4. The claim that globular star clusters revolve around spiral galaxies also goes beyond celestial mechanics.a) For globular star clusters to rotate around the center of the galaxy, the galaxy itself must rotate around the center, and not be in free flight. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globular_clusterWho will be able to answer the next question.
There are no answers to the following questions:1. Stars hang above the poles of the galaxy?a) Without a doubt, this is levitation and contradicts elementary logic.b) Whether the planet can hang motionless, above the pole of the sun. http://www.astro.caltech.edu/ay1/Ay1_main.html2. In the solar system, all eight planets revolve around the sun in the same plane.a) And the stars, revolving around the nucleus of the galaxy, form dozens of planes.b) What force is involved in the formation of the lenticular shape of the galaxy.c) Within the laws of celestial mechanics, stars can rotate around the core of the galaxy, only in one plane, similar to the planets of the solar system.d) Do the orbits of stars intersect in irregular and other galaxies?3. Around the north and south poles of the sun, planets will not be able to rotate.a) And around the poles of the galaxy stars rotate.4. The claim that globular star clusters revolve around spiral galaxies also goes beyond celestial mechanics.a) For globular star clusters to rotate around the center of the galaxy, the galaxy itself must rotate around the center, and not be in free flight. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globular_cluster
Do the orbits of stars intersect in irregular and other galaxies?
Earthquake hypothesis.The cause of tremors may be an explosion of underground gases as a result of self-ignition of compressed gas. An explosion can also occur, and from an electric discharge.
1. There are no convincing facts that tectonic plates exist.
The assertion that the plates move due to the temperature difference in the bowels of the Earth is doubtful.
It is also doubtful that lithospheric plates can sink in the mantle of the planet, reaching the depth of the outer core.
You can conduct a simple experiment, if in the pool, to move towards each other, two rubber or wooden plates.
will not be able to:a) During earthquakes, move the surface of the earth, with such an amplitude and on such a scale.
On the crust of the earth, the force of gravity and the centrifugal force of the earth act. But because of the orbital rotation of the earth, the centrifugal force of the earth fluctuates. Due to this, there is a mixing of the earth's crust, but not an earthquake.
The data was published but without any fanfare hoping it goes away.
Science does not have its own resources, but is beholden on others like government, business and private donations...
One wild card variable that needs to a added, is that the core of the earth rotates faster than the surface. This is an observation that has been published in the scientific literature. However, many experts wish to ignore it, since it is a huge spoiler to all existing theory. This extra core rotation is relatively slow, but much faster than geological movement. http://www.columbia.edu/cu/record/archives/vol22/vol22_iss1/Core_Spin.htmlOne would expect viscoelastic friction between the faster moving core and the outer core/upper mantle, which then drags the slower moving surface. The slower moving surface is closer to the moon and is more impacted by the gravity of the moon. There should be stresses on the surface. If we did not have earthquakes, to release the stresses, I would be very surprised. Science needs to adapt to the latest data and not ignore what is inconvenient to the bureaucratic traditions and power structure. Nobody even mentions this revolutionary new observational data. Either scientists are not curious, or pseudo-censorship is in effect. The data was published but without any fanfare hoping it goes away. The way science should work is such new data should be widely proclaimed, and a formal declaration be made that states something like, " all existing theory for the earth, has been brought into question by some new revolutionary observational data. For now on, all that was considered infallible, is now once again part of alternative theory. Let the gold rush begin. " This would be better for science, since it would stimulate the creative minds, who will prospect for gold. This give incentive for progress since the creators would be on equal footing with the obsolete, instead of under the thumb of the obsolete as is now the case. Science does not have its own resources, but is beholden on others like government, business and private donations for it's funding. These all have influence, as to what shall be in science. You bring the basketball to the game, you get to set the rules. This is about the money. No politician or bureaucrat will allow anything to change, if that change can make them look bad or foolish. The progress of science suffers. This is why we are in the bronze and rusty metal age of science. There is no excuse for this.
Quote from: puppypower on 23/04/2020 12:11:37One wild card variable that needs to a added, is that the core of the earth rotates faster than the surface. This is an observation that has been published in the scientific literature. However, many experts wish to ignore it, since it is a huge spoiler to all existing theory. This extra core rotation is relatively slow, but much faster than geological movement. http://www.columbia.edu/cu/record/archives/vol22/vol22_iss1/Core_Spin.htmlOne would expect viscoelastic friction between the faster moving core and the outer core/upper mantle, which then drags the slower moving surface. The slower moving surface is closer to the moon and is more impacted by the gravity of the moon. There should be stresses on the surface. If we did not have earthquakes, to release the stresses, I would be very surprised. Science needs to adapt to the latest data and not ignore what is inconvenient to the bureaucratic traditions and power structure. Nobody even mentions this revolutionary new observational data. Either scientists are not curious, or pseudo-censorship is in effect. The data was published but without any fanfare hoping it goes away. The way science should work is such new data should be widely proclaimed, and a formal declaration be made that states something like, " all existing theory for the earth, has been brought into question by some new revolutionary observational data. For now on, all that was considered infallible, is now once again part of alternative theory. Let the gold rush begin. " This would be better for science, since it would stimulate the creative minds, who will prospect for gold. This give incentive for progress since the creators would be on equal footing with the obsolete, instead of under the thumb of the obsolete as is now the case. Science does not have its own resources, but is beholden on others like government, business and private donations for it's funding. These all have influence, as to what shall be in science. You bring the basketball to the game, you get to set the rules. This is about the money. No politician or bureaucrat will allow anything to change, if that change can make them look bad or foolish. The progress of science suffers. This is why we are in the bronze and rusty metal age of science. There is no excuse for this. The kind of anti- science idiocy we expect from you, which purely to demonstrate that you and your ilk really do not understand how science works so you content yourself with posting idiotic nonsense.
There is other recent data that needs to be taken into account. For example, water has been found in large quantifies, inside the earth.
Quote from: puppypower on 24/04/2020 14:10:54There is other recent data that needs to be taken into account. For example, water has been found in large quantifies, inside the earth. Oh great, here we go with Aqualad again.
I am pointing out the latest data that needs to be taken into account. These are new pieces to the puzzle. Repression of valid, but contradictory data, does not advance science, but it can perpetuate bureaucracy.
The movement of the water, inside the earth, will driven by entropy and free energy considerations, regardless of the direction of gravity.