0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
If a moving object created a wave in space behind it then the energy of its velocity would convert into the wave and the object would slow down
And if for example two binary black holes did create such a wave it would push them apart
it would push them apart
And they do.", the rate of decrease of orbital period is 76.5 microseconds per year, "Fromhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hulse%E2%80%93Taylor_binary#Use_as_a_test_of_General_Relativity
Then the object moving would slow down and stop
Do I have to remind you that meteor's don't have rocket engine's?
Quote from: trevorjohnson32 on 24/10/2020 21:03:15Then the object moving would slow down and stopAnd they do.But what you seem to be ignoring is when gravity waves are produced.Quote from: trevorjohnson32 on 24/10/2020 21:03:15 Do I have to remind you that meteor's don't have rocket engine's?That's largely why they don't produce gravity waves.Without an engine they travel through space at a constant velocity.Their acceleration is zero and so their emission of gravity waves is zero.But a rotating body is constantly accelerating and thus emits gravity waves.Did you consider actually finding out about gravity waves before making a fool of yourself?Even reading the first line of the wiki page would have stopped you looking dumb."Gravitational waves are disturbances in the curvature of spacetime, generated by accelerated masses"On a related note, misusing apostrophes also makes you look dim.
If a moving accelerating object created a wave in space behind it then the energy of its velocity would convert into the wave and the object would slow down like turning the engine off on a boat
how do two orbiting objects create an engine to fuel their acceleration?
answer me how do two orbiting objects create an engine to fuel their acceleration? That sounds totally ridiculous.
Your dealing with constant speeds of things not a magic engine where you see convenient.
why wouldn't objects at super high speeds?
If you break gravity down to individual particles of matter, what does it matter if an object is rotating or moving mono directional?
create an engine to fuel their acceleration
If a moving object created a wave in space behind it then the energy of its velocity would convert into the wave and the object would slow down like turning the engine off on a boat.
And if for example two binary black holes did create such a wave it would push them apart not draw them together which is total GR fantasm.
Then the object moving would slow down and stop.
Well I'm going to have to ask you to step outside the box of pompous asses who believe in relativity
answer me how do two orbiting objects create an engine to fuel their acceleration?
That sounds totally ridiculous.
It all comes down to the movement of weight through the universe, if weight circulating creates a gravity wave why wouldn't objects at super high speeds? If you break gravity down to individual particles of matter, what does it matter if an object is rotating or moving mono directional?
If a moving object created a wave in space behind it then the energy of its velocity would convert into the wave and the object would slow down like turning the engine off on a boat. As we all know objects moving through space continue on trajectory unless acted on by an outside force, not a gravity wave. And if for example two binary black holes did create such a wave it would push them apart not draw them together which is total GR fantasm.
So a boat doing a circle in the water creates a wave vs a boat that goes straight which would create no wave?
It isn't hard to detect that you need long confusing explanations to describe something that its probably flawed and you don't want to admit it.
Whatever you think you've learned it sounds like fantasy
based on the uncertain results of a 133 year old experiment that was flawed in the first place.
Sorry my answers are concise without confusion of math's.
I just point out the obvious quicker and don't need long winded answers.
When you say "Gravity Waves more GR Fantasy", are you talking about your fantasy?Because it seems to be a fantasy of yours that fast moving things create gravity waves, and another fantasy that acceleration is comparable with velocity?
Whatever you think you've learned it sounds like fantasy based on the uncertain results of a 133 year old experiment that was flawed in the first place.
The "gravity wave" ... is really not a gravity wave.
ocal space-time being tweak in time,
pace then following the lead expected by the mass.
I use the speed of light as the ground state or the state of lowest potential.
At the speed of light reference,
masses gain potential in inertial time
However, the wave-particle nature of matter and energy has never coughed up a graviton along with the "gravity waves", Therefore this is not directly connected to gravity, but to the acceleration or extra time potential.
Quote from: puppypower on 26/10/2020 11:14:31However, the wave-particle nature of matter and energy has never coughed up a graviton along with the "gravity waves", Therefore this is not directly connected to gravity, but to the acceleration or extra time potential. I think you and the OP mean gravitational waves. Gravity waves are those where the restoring force is due to gravity eg ocean waves, sub-surface waves, atmospheric waves etc.Helps if you learn the correct terminology.
Nothing really comes to mind when I read any of your responses because it's all arrogant rubbish that would take years of studying
Quiet sick of arguing this with the internet
s