21
New Theories / Conservation of Momentum in a Gravitational Collapse
« on: 20/05/2009 00:23:49 »You haven't even attempted to scale things appropriately.
I'm sorry but your simulation is simply nonsense, it is so very far removed from the real mass distribution, strength and speeds of the WTC that you can draw no conclusions at all.
If you watch both of my videos
You will notice that I have frames that ask about the tons of steel and tons of concrete on every level of the towers.
I did not try to build scaled models. How can you build scaled models demonstrating the physics if you don't have the distribution of mass data on the subject? The purpose of my designs was to demonstrate that the material that we do not have accurate information on had to affect what happened.
It doesn't even make sense to have an investigation without information that simple. The NCSTAR1 report doesn't even specify the total quantity of concrete in the towers.
So you are correct in that it is not scaled. I never claimed it was. But the models are built to be variable and my collapse demonstrated that stationary masses slow the falling mass down. But the strength of toothpicks in my collapse demonstration is constant while a real skyscraper must get stronger and heavier all of the way down.
Your complaint is silly.
psik