1

New Theories / Re: Wave Equation Of The Universe

« on: 04/05/2022 12:04:41 »

What does \Box? mean?

A clue to the OP's identity perhaps?

2

That CAN'T be true! / Re: What causes motion sickness?

« on: 02/05/2022 11:49:47 »

https://www.motion-sickness-guru.com/causes-of-motion-sickness.html
Many people in the comments of this article have proved that seasickness are caused by low-frequency noise.

Which shows that you do not understand the difference between evidence and anecdote, instead using the latter to justify your idiotic nonsense.

3

New Theories / Re: Evolution is Falsified!

« on: 11/03/2022 21:41:57 »

This thread is starting to devolve into complaints and void accusations instead of being an actual, scientific discussion. If that doesn't change, the usefulness of this thread is going to be called into question. Don't let this turn into a spamfest.

Accusing me of trolling is an insult to a scientist and science. Thus, tell me which part of falsification process in my link that I should copy and paste so that you could rebut. You cannot agree with me, right? Which means, you are right. Then, tell me, which part of the article you think I am wrong?

Suppressing the truth in science is (1) Crime against humanity, (2) Human Right’s violation (3) Child Abuse and (4) Violation of Nobel Prize, as set by Alfred Nobel.

PLEASE, share the Falsification of Evolution to all. Hard to swallow to some, but that is reality...

Please, help me call the Nobel Committee to stop awarding any scientist who support Evolution, unless, that scientist can resurrect Evolution. PLEASE, help and save the world from stupidity of Evolution.

Your are just spamming now. You have failed to produce evidence and merely asserted what you have said is true. This is not science, and based on the content of your posts, you are no scientist.

4

New Theories / Re: Evolution is Falsified!

« on: 11/03/2022 21:15:21 »

You are the enemies of science. Suppressing truth in science is (1) Crime against humanity, (2) Human Right’s violation (3) Child Abuse and (4) Violation of Nobel Prize, as set by Alfred Nobel. SPREAD THIS NEWS that "EVOLUTION IS FALSIFIED!"
It is like burning books.

Do grow up.

5

New Theories / Re: Evolution is Falsified!

« on: 11/03/2022 20:33:32 »

But anything that has connection with ToE, evolution and Darwin, must be discarded and replaced, considered pseudo-science, unless the topics are criticizing them.

Not without evidence, that you seem to be unable to produce.

Are you asking me to COPY and PASTE the whole article here? It is OK for me... do you want me to? Just say YES, and I will gladly do it for you...

Suppressing truth in science is (1) Crime against humanity, (2) Human Right’s violation (3) Child Abuse and (4) Violation of Nobel Prize, as set by Alfred Nobel. SPREAD THIS NEWS that "EVOLUTION IS FALSIFIED!"

https://zenodo.org/record/6347749#.YiuiNXFBx9N

I did not ask for the article I asked for evidence. Do you not know the difference? Again, the use of capitalisation makes you appear a fool and a troll.

6

New Theories / Re: Evolution is Falsified!

« on: 11/03/2022 19:14:44 »

But anything that has connection with ToE, evolution and Darwin, must be discarded and replaced, considered pseudo-science, unless the topics are criticizing them.

Not without evidence, that you seem to be unable to produce.

7

New Theories / Re: Evolution is Falsified!

« on: 11/03/2022 19:12:25 »

I have evidences since I falsified Evolution

Which you keep claiming, but fail to provide. Instead you just post outlandish claims.

I have evidences. I am not lazy. I can copy and paste for if I give you the summary, you will surely complain. So, I give you the FREE article.. "EVOLUTION IS FALSIFIED!" that is the fact! Hard to swallow, but fact!

https://zenodo.org/record/6347675#.YiuQ-nFBx9M

This is a discussion thread, we didn't ask for a link to your 'paper', you have been asked repeatedly to provide evidence not assertions. By the way, what do you think capitalising achieves other than making you look like a religious nut job?

8

New Theories / Re: Evolution is Falsified!

« on: 11/03/2022 18:07:38 »

I have evidences since I falsified Evolution

Which you keep claiming, but fail to provide. Instead you just post outlandish claims.

9

New Theories / Re: Evolution is Falsified!

« on: 11/03/2022 18:05:43 »

Oh my... you really do not know what you are talking about!!! Oh my... oh no...what are you talking?

This is just trolling.

10

New Theories / Re: Black Holes are Probably Wrong?

« on: 27/02/2022 20:38:31 »

Now we can get back to MrIntellegentDesign misrepresenting science...

I did not misrepresent science. I had shown you some of the best scientists in the documentary talking the topic of GRAVITY. Did you get their explanations? Like gravity is pushing force?

Don't talk crap.

11

New Theories / Re: Black Holes are Probably Wrong?

« on: 27/02/2022 17:28:54 »

I understood that you knew Newton's gravity but not Einstein's explanation of gravity..

Or do you mean equilibrium state of space?.

I don't know what that means, so that's not what I meant.

You really do not know GRAVITY, lol!

This has all the characteristics of a child trolling.

It is vey difficult to explain Cosmology or Physics, if you do not know GRAVITY.  Do you The Spoon? Can you help Kryptid about GRAVITY?

Kryptid appears to understand it perfectly well. However, your vacuous, idiotic, childish statements indicate that you do not.

12

New Theories / Re: Black Holes are Probably Wrong?

« on: 27/02/2022 07:47:25 »

I understood that you knew Newton's gravity but not Einstein's explanation of gravity..

Or do you mean equilibrium state of space?.

I don't know what that means, so that's not what I meant.

You really do not know GRAVITY, lol!

This has all the characteristics of a child trolling.

13

New Theories / Re: Black Holes are Probably Wrong?

« on: 22/02/2022 13:19:32 »

In honor of me, when you use this ANALOGY, please, call it Postrado's Pool or MrID's Pool... or MrIntelligentDesign's Pool..

I think Fool's Pool is far more fitting.

14

New Theories / Re: Scientific Falsification of the Theory of Evolution (ToE) and Introducing ToE's

« on: 19/02/2022 23:26:52 »

That is why, either I am a genius or a troll or stupid

You missed out fantasist. This forum attracts a lot of these - those who claim to be a self proclaimed genius, but when asked to provide any kind of evidence to support their fantastical 'theory' just waffle and cannot produce the goods. Colloquially known as bullshitting.

Are those self proclaimed geniuses discover intelligence like me?

There is always time for everything. Wait and I will surely give the world the FREE article.

Well, if it is anything like the utter nonsense you have posted on here, it won't be worth waiting for.

15

New Theories / Re: Scientific Falsification of the Theory of Evolution (ToE) and Introducing ToE's

« on: 19/02/2022 22:50:17 »

That is why, either I am a genius or a troll or stupid

You missed out fantasist. This forum attracts a lot of these - those who claim to be a self proclaimed genius, but when asked to provide any kind of evidence to support their fantastical 'theory' just waffle and cannot produce the goods. Colloquially known as bullshitting.

16

New Theories / Re: Scientific Falsification of the Theory of Evolution (ToE) and Introducing ToE's

« on: 18/02/2022 16:11:25 »

You know, what if the peer-reviewers are using the same approach like religious people, like, he is Christian, I am Christian, therefore, that he passed, no Christian? failed.. is that right/fair?

How would people carrying out peer review know what your religious beliefs are? It would be irrelevant information when submitting a paper to a journal. It is not like they ask you to fill in a questionnaire about religious beliefs. Still, why let paranoia stop you posting such ridiculous claims?

17

New Theories / Re: Scientific Falsification of the Theory of Evolution (ToE) and Introducing ToE's

« on: 18/02/2022 16:06:43 »

I reviewed them, they are all wrong, so how do you know if I am right or wrong?

So we have to take your word on faith that you have reviewed them and that they are all wrong. That is not science, it is a faith based position or likely, just trolling. You have repeatedly been asked to produce evidence, but you repeatedly fail and just post nonsense.

18

New Theories / Re: ESP for planet hunting / advancements in Cosmology

« on: 23/12/2021 12:52:59 »

The film Third Eye Spies markets itself as 'a true story'.

So did the book and film Amityville Horror.

19

New Theories / Re: Coronavirus will get weaker and then what?

« on: 17/11/2021 13:42:48 »

The question I have is, do masks and social distancing cause this expiration date problem for the vaccinated?

No
It's essentially a consequence of how the immune system works and how viruses mutate.
It's no coincidence that flu jabs also require boosters every year or so.
And they did that when practically nobody wore masks.

So the obvious evidence answers your question.

Why did you ask it?

it will delay herd immunity.

Herd immunity, in the absence of a good vaccine, means "we let the susceptible ones die".

Is that what you want?


In 50 years or so, your model will sort-of work, because everyone will have grown up getting this bug from time to time.
But for now, it's not a good plan.

I heard an estimate of 13 months.

How long is it since the first vaccination tests in human?
What a coincidence!

Science and atheism accept evolution in theory, but they avoid it in practice. Instead they practice a type of man made creationism, based on synthetic additives and unnatural outcomes.

I was proposing a natural path, while the consensus of science assumes one size fits all based on the lowest common denominator. This is enforced with guilt and fear and not the principles of evolution. It is strange religion of hypocrisy. It seems to be connected to the oracles of statistics generating worse case scenarios, to help lead thinking.

The path I suggested, which is to exercise the immune system, allows one to overcome mutations faster and easier. The immune system does not require all aspect of a virus to have a successful immune response. The Pfizer vaccine only provides surface protein and this is very effective. Immune system exercise, will gather fragments of both the outer and inner virus under favorable body conditions.  If there is a mutation, that will be many other way to recognize this virus type. No virus will totally change 100%. If we get to avoid immune exercise and the immune system goes off alert in 13 months, then you will be vulnerable. This is part of a good business model.

In the wild of the natural world, herd of deer do not mask up, but somehow they continue to exist. They do not change behavior other than slow down a little. They will continue to interact with each until natural selection makes the herd stronger.

If this does not apply to humans, does that mean human are not under evolution and natural selection? Does it mean we are a creation that can learn to avoid natural selection through will and choice? You can take science out of religion but not religion out of science.

More word salad from the sites premier garbage merchant. The only thing it achieves is to demonstrate a lack of scientific knowledge and an inability to understand concepts like 'science' and 'athiesm'.

20

New Theories / Re: Coronavirus will get weaker and then what?

« on: 22/10/2021 13:21:51 »

All women need to be impregnated immediately by men who show natural resistance to the lethal covid disease, otherwise we will be following a path of survival of the weakest. We saw a similar thing in the Colombian exchange where smallpox flu plague measles etcetc destroyed almost entirely the peoples of the americas.


Although,,,,,, a breeding ages, the mated pair usually being at their prime around 15 to 35 for women and 25 to 45 for men, corona virus holds no fear.

So you are saying that women should be completely passive and have no say in this? It is like some kind of Incel fantasy..an utterly disgusting attitude.