The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Profile of Bobolink
  3. Show Posts
  4. Thanked Posts
  • Profile Info
    • Summary
    • Show Stats
    • Show Posts
      • Messages
      • Topics
      • Attachments
      • Thanked Posts
      • Posts Thanked By User
    • Show User Topics
      • User Created
      • User Participated In

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

  • Messages
  • Topics
  • Attachments
  • Thanked Posts
  • Posts Thanked By User

Messages - Bobolink

Pages: [1]
1
New Theories / Re: Theory D - The Ultimate Theory for the Universe
« on: 29/04/2020 03:32:31 »
Quote from: Dave Lev on 28/04/2020 14:19:00
That proves that something must be wrong.
Clearly.
Quote from: Dave Lev on 28/04/2020 14:19:00
If my calculation is correct, than there must be an error in the BBT.
Then obviously your calculation is wrong.
The following users thanked this post: Kryptid

2
Cells, Microbes & Viruses / Re: Virus Membrane the weakest link?
« on: 26/04/2020 18:06:21 »
Quote from: Space99 on 26/04/2020 17:46:38
 I know that washing with soap, we are told dissolves the Virus Membrane.
I didn't know that.  Did some quick research on it.  It really is quite interesting.  Thanks for that bit of information. 
I had assumed soap just helped rinse it away from your hands, I really suck at biology...
The following users thanked this post: Space99

3
New Theories / Re: Sum of energy not at 0 in that movement
« on: 25/04/2020 17:33:09 »
Quote from: LB7 on 25/04/2020 05:23:09
I see, the problem comes from the fixed dot, I can't use a fixed dot, so attach the elastic between the circle and the red wall and I change the elastic at each step:
Like I said the 'missing' energy is in the elastic.  You guys always crack me up, you think that if you make the scenario complicated enough then some law or other of physics will no longer apply.  You can easily make a scenario I can't figure out, that doesn't mean the laws of physics don't apply it will just mean I can't figure it out.
The following users thanked this post: LB7

4
New Theories / Re: Why doesn't the Speed of Light Change?
« on: 20/04/2020 16:48:51 »
Quote from: puppypower on 20/04/2020 12:03:06
The speed of light is the ground state reference of the universe.
This is one several meaningless mantras you like to repeat.
Quote from: puppypower on 20/04/2020 12:03:06
It is like sea level or C-level, for the universe.
Meaningless.  It is funny after all these years you still cannot even figure out that the speed of light is denoted by 'c', not 'C'.
Quote from: puppypower on 20/04/2020 12:03:06
If we took photons and increased their frequency to gamma and beyond, eventually the photons will split into matter and antimatter pairs.
Not true.  Photons that are above 1.02 MeV can result in pair production, but photons do not just turn into an electron-positrons at high energy.  Most high energy photons that interact with matter result in ionization of atoms, not pair production.  If the photons are moving through a vacuum will not undergo pair production.
Quote from: puppypower on 20/04/2020 12:03:06
Matter and antimatter is at the upper potential of energy and photons.
Wrong as pointed out above.
Quote from: puppypower on 20/04/2020 12:03:06
The discontinuity at C means that space-time becomes discontinuous at C.
First you mean 'c'.  Secondly, wrong yet again!  It means you cannot go the speed of light.  You really don't seem to get any of this.  It is like you wear your ignorance as a badge of honor. 
Quote from: puppypower on 20/04/2020 12:03:06
If we use the speed of light as the ground state from the POV of a relative reference choice, so many things and mysteries are easier to explain.
Completely wrong and inane, but definitely easier than doing physics.
The following users thanked this post: hamdani yusuf

Pages: [1]
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.055 seconds with 29 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.