The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Chemistry
  4. can you write these elements up to down ..from more reactive to less reactive
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

can you write these elements up to down ..from more reactive to less reactive

  • 2 Replies
  • 3655 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline taregg (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 168
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
can you write these elements up to down ..from more reactive to less reactive
« on: 19/06/2014 19:29:53 »
can you write these elements up to down ..from more reactive  to less reactive
F O N C Cl S P I Br.....
« Last Edit: 20/06/2014 18:00:55 by taregg »
Logged
 



Offline taregg (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 168
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: can you write these elements up to down ..from more reactive to less reactive
« Reply #1 on: 21/06/2014 21:29:52 »
can some body answer my question. ...Please
Logged
 

Online chiralSPO

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 3711
  • Activity:
    11.5%
  • Thanked: 513 times
    • View Profile
Re: can you write these elements up to down ..from more reactive to less reactive
« Reply #2 on: 22/06/2014 16:33:38 »
You have to define what you mean by "reactive" a little better (reacting with what? under what conditions? do you care about reaction rate, heat of reaction, activation energy?). A simple google search will show the order of electron affinity or electronegativity (all of the elements you listed are likely to gain electrons, when reacted with metals; though C, P and S are also easily oxidized).

Fluorine has the highest electron affinity of any element, and also forms a very small ion (fluoride), so the heat of reaction is extremely high. However, fluorine gas (F2) has a fairly strong bond and is not very polarizable, as compared to bromine or iodine (Br2 or I2), so it can actually be harder to get a reaction started. An additional complication is that Br2 is a liquid, so the concentration of Br2 is much higher than even highly compressed F2, and the higher concentrations usually allow for significantly faster reactions (many metals will spontaneously combust on contact with liquid bromine, but not when exposed to chlorine gas, which one might expect to be more reactive...)

To make matters even more complicated, some of the elements listed (most notably C, P, S and O) exist in many allotropes (different chemical structures, but each composed of only one element). Diamond, graphite and the whole family of fullerenes are all different allotropes of carbon, with (very) different chemical and physical properties. Phosphorus can also exist in several different forms, most notably red phosphorus (more stable) and white phosphorus (extremely reactive). Sulfur is typically found in as a cyclic octomer (S8), but when heated, can form any number of cyclic and acyclic polymers. At high enough temperatures, S2 can be the dominant form--and this is quite reactive. O3 (ozone) is significantly more reactive than oxygen (O2), and can even react with itself and detonate at a high enough concentration and temperature. Even O2 can exist in two electronic different states (not quite different allotropes)--the ground state is paramagnetic (triplet oxygen), but can be excited to form a diamagnetic form (singlet oxygen), which is so reactive that at room temperature, most organic compounds would spontaneously combust in an atmosphere of pure singlet oxygen (and the reaction is diffusion limited).

I hope this helps (or was interesting)
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Must ∞ monkeys on ∞ typewriters really write everything given ∞ time?

Started by chiralSPOBoard General Science

Replies: 28
Views: 29224
Last post 28/03/2020 11:42:26
by yor_on
Where did Rindler write about relativistic mass and potential energy?

Started by PmbPhyBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 4
Views: 1915
Last post 18/10/2018 12:31:45
by Bill S
Synesthesia – Can sufferers write more expressively using colour?

Started by John ChapmanBoard Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 5
Views: 5821
Last post 21/03/2009 03:50:15
by Karen W.
Could a person write two different exam answers, one with each hand?

Started by JyotiranjanbeheraBoard That CAN'T be true!

Replies: 28
Views: 9717
Last post 08/01/2019 09:42:02
by alancalverd
How to write a deep learning server in Python?

Started by smartBoard Geek Speak

Replies: 1
Views: 1926
Last post 25/10/2017 19:47:53
by evan_au
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.078 seconds with 35 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.