Total Members Voted: 6
Voting closed: 16/02/2021 12:16:31
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
You said thisQuote from: talanum1 on 14/01/2021 11:18:04I made protons and electrons with my mind - they talk to me telepathicallyWhat did they tell you?
I can put two eggs in a box, but it does not follow that I can put two elephants in that box.There is a rule that stops me.I can't do that because elephants are too big.
If you suppose the elephant are points,
What you are saying is " we could do an impossible thing, and that is illogical because it is impossible".The point is that you can't do the impossible thing, so the logic issue can not arise.
As I said:Quote from: Bored chemist on Today at 10:21:46a lot of lies are on the internet.
You're not thinking like a Logician.
But the laws of physics do prohibit it.So it doesn't happen.And, because it doesn't happen, it doesn't violate those laws.
They could tell me things I didn't know.
premise is supposed
Such as?
By whom?Who supposes that?
The word "telepathy" exist so it is likely the phenomenon exists.
Whoever can.
I can't remember, but I did have to look it up in the Dictionary. I just remember I've seen it black on white.
The particles I know it was outside me since I felt it at a certain position. I can pinpoint where voices come from.
https://www.whiteoutpress.com/scientists-prove-mental-telepathy-real/
As a lifelong believer in ESP, this author noticed there was one major ingredient missing from the successful experiment. The senders needed to be connected to a computer via electrodes attached to the skull. The receivers were similarly connected. And a computer was required to detect the brain activity of one and stimulate brain activity in the other. The piece of the puzzle still missing is the human brain’s ability to stimulate another brain without the help of electrodes and computers. When the world’s scientists figure out how to do that, mental telepathy will truly be a reality.
https://www.insidescience.org/video/telepathy-real
Put all of this together and you have the first demonstration of telepathy: One person concentrates on something in particular, this is read as specific EEG brain activity, that is sent by wire to a TMS wand, and that stimulates another person’s brain and they see a flash of light. That was done back in 2014.
https://anomalien.com/scientific-evidence-of-telepathyhttps://www.alittlesparkofjoy.com/telepathywww.yogebooks.com/english/atkinson/1910telepathy.pdf
The only time that one may super impose two particles, is if the two particles have opposite polarity........and at the same energy level. The superposition will not last long, because the particles are unwinding each other and dissolving into space.........EM emission.Science calls this a matter, antimatter reaction.
But that's really beside the point, as what you really need to demonstrate is that you, specifically, are telepathic. Can you demonstrate this?
I sent you a telepathic message and you responded: you told me not to put thoughts in your head again.
Saying particles are point-like is just like saying they are points.
As for the tactile hallucination: it wasn't a physical feeling it was spiritual. You must have felt someone looking at you in the past - it is that power.
I wasn't hallucinating
Tell me if that is valid or invalid.
I heard Earth complain about me making the particles.
She put them in my throat.
Maybe we can discuss a parallel topic, that is a compromise. Can highly localized space-time events impact point particles that already exist? For example, the outer electrons of larger metallic atoms, can travel at a significant fraction of the speed of light and can thereby display relativistic affects; Relativistic Quantum Chemistry. For example, the yellow color of gold can be explained as a local time shift, around the outer electrons of gold, such that all all colors that reflect off these the outer electrons of gold will take on a yellowish cast. The outer electrons of gold are in a different space-time reference; SR, than the nucleus of the same atoms. These two references will create uncertainty relative to the electrons and nucleus, since each sees different propagations of space-time events. This makes gold very inert, to most of chemistry, since most chemical space-time frames do not overlap very well with the relativistic frames of the outer electrons of gold. There is uncertainty. As we go from the outer electrons, to the inner electrons of gold, the electrons move faster and faster, like a skater who pulls their arms in while spinning. These inner electron references are so different from most of outer electron chemistry, that the nucleus cannot easily steal an inner electron nor do these inner electrons have any connection to any physical property of gold we can measure, since they are in their own frame. These examples do not use space-time references to create particles, but it does use space-time events to manipulate particles that already exist. For example, proton or electron tunneling could be explained by shifts in the local space-time grid, so particles can break out of one expected reference, and enter another reference so it can move to the beat of its own drum. On the other side it exists the space-time induction, In this case a collection of atoms, such as in liquid water, two overlapping spar-time grids appear, one in the nucleus reference and the other in the electron reference. These two grids can impact their own kind more that the other kind. In the case of water the hydrogen proton becomes very mobile and can even tunnel in pairs. This is very useful for creating and sustaining life, which depends on the free migration of hydrogen protons via hydrogen bonding.
For example, the yellow color of gold can be explained as a local time shift,
The outer electrons of gold are in a different space-time reference; SR, than the nucleus of the same atoms.
like a skater who pulls their arms in while spinning.
These inner electron references
These examples do not use space-time references to create particles,
On the other side it exists the space-time induction,
In this case a collection of atoms, such as in liquid water, two overlapping spar-time grids appear, one in the nucleus reference and the other in the electron reference. These two grids can impact their own kind more that the other kind. In the case of water the hydrogen proton becomes very mobile and can even tunnel in pairs. This is very useful for creating and sustaining life, which depends on the free migration of hydrogen protons via hydrogen bonding.
If you can really send and receive messages mentally, then tell me what number I'm thinking of. It's between 1 and 1,000, so there is about a 0.1% chance that you'll get it right just by guessing.
Welp, that demonstrates that you're only hallucinating, as I never responded to any such thing.
Put what in your throat? The particles?
I wasn't hallucinating because...