The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Profile of marzosia2
  3. Show Posts
  4. Messages
  • Profile Info
    • Summary
    • Show Stats
    • Show Posts
      • Messages
      • Topics
      • Attachments
      • Thanked Posts
      • Posts Thanked By User
    • Show User Topics
      • User Created
      • User Participated In

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

  • Messages
  • Topics
  • Attachments
  • Thanked Posts
  • Posts Thanked By User

Messages - marzosia2

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
1
New Theories / Steam engine for space ship
« on: 09/04/2016 12:03:07 »










Maciej Marosz I'm 36 engineer and inventor

2
New Theories / Re: inconstant photon velocity
« on: 07/04/2016 05:07:37 »
Quote from: Thebox on 06/04/2016 11:52:57
you are not producing any sort of theory that is  understandable to anybody but you


MY TARGET IS NOT PRODUCING  THEORIES !
I NOT LIKE WORD THEORY !

I LIKE WORD ( FACT / TRUE /FALSE )

on my pictures You can see that Exist IDEAL GAS around EARTH
THIS IDEAL GAS it is ENERGY ( Electro-Magnetic Pascal )
I ALSO FIND DOPPLER inside MICHELSON MORLEY TEST
 (FACT we not have ZERO on this TABLE )

MICHELSON MORLYE TEST and DOPPLER  INSIDE = THAT SPACE IS ABSOLUTE !!!!

3
New Theories / Re: inconstant photon velocity
« on: 06/04/2016 04:48:06 »
PEOPLE WHO WORKING and MAKING EXPERIMENTS  are able CHANGE PHYSICS
without any problem

PEOPLE WHO TALKING about PHYSICS
will be TALK ABOUT MY WORK not ABOUT UNREAL
THEORIES !



THIS BOAT  USE ONLY INERTIA


I'm ENGINEER! I LOVE MACHINES !
 ELECTRIC WIRE FLY SYSTEM









300 kg 
80 km/h
25 kW


KAMOW - great person from RUSSIA ( designer )

NICOLA TESLA small fast RPM turbines


MAROSZ ( high pressure AIR is very good and strong medium
very nice special for FIREMAN to protect vehicle and person inside from CO"
zero danger fuel )

















ART wil never DIE !!!
I'm able prepare small local  Earth Quake
I WILL EVALUATE THIS OPTION
IF I WILL SEE THAT PEOPLE FROM LIGO TAKING NOBEL PRIZE ! I WILL DESTROY THIS PIPE
300 000 000  USD ?  cheap small earth quake !

I will not kill anyone only small EARTH QUAKE !
THEY WILL BE ABLE MEASURE !!! HOW SPACE MAKING VIBRATION !!!:) :) :) 

MY GRANDFATHER   FIGHTED   WITH HITLER
PEOPLE FROM POLAND LOVE FIGHT
WE HAVE THIS IN BLOD !




 AIRPORTS BOMB ALARM MAROSZ's VERSION
I saw in Berlin problems on Airport ( someone left Bag - policeman stand near BAG he  talked to people lookout danger is here not go near bag .

I ASKED MY SELF WHAT IF BOMB IS THERE ? POLICEMAN ME AND MY FAMILY IS IN DANGER POSITION .
WHY POLICE NOT COVERED BAG BY PIPE ?  ( I INVENTED PIPE !)   




ENGINEER / INVENTOR / PHYSICS
EINSTEIN ? WHO  WAS .... EINSTEIN ?


NEW GENERATION SKI BINDING ( dynamic leg protection )


4
New Theories / Re: inconstant photon velocity
« on: 05/04/2016 19:28:57 »
MY POLISH IS BETTER THAN MY ENGLISH !

MY Ytube ( I speaking  about physics )

5
New Theories / Re: inconstant photon velocity
« on: 05/04/2016 19:16:46 »
21 person (physics )



27 person (physics )



ARE YOU TRYING TO TELL ME THAT TRUE WILL DIE ! ?

6
New Theories / Re: inconstant photon velocity
« on: 05/04/2016 06:38:48 »
Quote from: NeT-HeaD on 10/03/2016 19:24:55
I learned that light travels at the same given speed no matter if a light source is static in a fixed place or the source is moving towards you in that same space.

What is it that decelarates a photon that is emitted from an object moving toward you with say half the speed of light to come back to exactly the fixed speed of light.

in other words, the photon would leave the lightsource at half the speed of light in order to arive at your position with the exact lightspeed , or am i seeing this wrong?

So 'something' must slow it down otherwise it would arive at one and a half times lightspeed.
What is this 'something'?

???

7
New Theories / Re: inconstant photon velocity
« on: 05/04/2016 00:44:51 »
SPACE IS NOT ISOTROPIC !
SPACE IS ABLE BE FULL ENERGY  and SPACE IS ABLE BE EMPTY

HOW MANY JOULES need PHOTON TO KEEP THE SAME SPEED ?



one more problem

Earth is registering INVERSE SQUARE LOW and is making rotation
IS PHOTON ABLE FEEL THE SAME PROBLEM ?
IS PHOTON ABLE MAKE ROTATION ?


8
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Is photon registering EM preassure ?
« on: 05/04/2016 00:36:58 »
1861 J. C. Maxwell, published his theory of electromagnetic fields and radiation,which shows that light has momentum and thus can exert pressure on objects.
2011 Grover Swartzlander first began to examine a revolutionary concept in optical physics after studying the flight of a moth. He watched the animal use its wings to create lift..... ( find more in google)



In universe exist many many stars !
Is space isotropic ? study please inverse square law and angular momentum




How heavy is mass m=1kg ?

0,001 mm  sheet has got near 100 m^2  area !!!



How big angular momentum  is registering mass m ?
( I speak on my drawing about EM pressure not about Air's pressure) 

option 3 exist or not ?



Angular momentum and EM preasure ?

9
New Theories / inconstant photon velocity
« on: 04/04/2016 11:36:30 »
I have very strong argument that PHOTON is not able
has got the same speed for ALL DIRECTIONS in space !


*******************************
1861 J. C. Maxwell, published his theory of electromagnetic fields and radiation,which shows that light has momentum and thus can exert pressure on objects.

*********************************

evidence
In universe exist many stars. Each star is giving EM wave to space
Please use INVERSE SQUARE LAW and please evaluate EM preassure
EM preassure  is giving NOT isotropic RESISTANCE TO PHOTON !


Energy's density is  not ISOTROPIC  !



How big torque is registering mass m ?
 ( please study Inverse Square Law and A-A area )
the mass m is roped to bulb (pendulum )
 please use INVERSE SQUARE LAW to evaluate that mass m is registering not isotropic TORQUE ! 





PHOTON NEED SYMETRY SPACE  TO SYMETRY SPEED  (energy's DENSITY = EM preassure )

someone who is telling You that he confirm all by Michelson Morley  making big mistake !



10
New Theories / Re: Double Slits how it works ?
« on: 01/04/2016 17:13:24 »
TORQUE PROBLEM ?
DOES PHOTON IS REGISTERING TORQUE ( anisotropy preasure )





PLEASE STUDY A-A area ?
 PHOTON >>>    <<< EM PREASURE ???


11
New Theories / Re: Double Slits how it works ?
« on: 01/04/2016 17:06:23 »
Space is full of energy ( EM preasure )
0,001 mm  sheet has got near 100 m^2  area !!!


HOW PHOTON IS MOVING UNDER PREASSURE ?





12
New Theories / Re: Double Slits how it works ?
« on: 01/04/2016 17:04:02 »
What is it photon ? 
how photon is moving inside space ?
photon  = 3D ball  shape ?

 "WHAT IS IT INTENSITY SHIFT ??? "
 May I test it INSIDE Galileo's ship ?
Distance D = constant ! /SUN's power = constant ! / L1 , L2 , L3 ?






13
New Theories / Re: Double Slits how it works ?
« on: 01/04/2016 15:24:26 »

EM preasure =machine that is transporting Energy
each direction has got other own special efficiency
EM preasure is not istropy ( exist Inverse Square Law ) 


 ENERGY ALWAYS  WANT TO RISE 3D Cmax speed

ABSOLUTE DEEP VACUUM ( XYZ mathematic space ) Light's speed Cmax
AETHER = medium ( slower than Cmax)
Air = medium ( slow)
Water = medium ( more slower )

copper = medium for Energy !


+......................10 meter wire ......................-   >>> 30km/s

elecric energy !
please measure resistance (+,- and -,+ ) direction ?!

14
New Theories / Re: Double Slits how it works ?
« on: 01/04/2016 15:21:50 »

15
New Theories / Re: Double Slits how it works ?
« on: 01/04/2016 15:17:04 »
above I showing some model  I'm not sure if it is ok ?

2011 Grover Swartzlander first began to examine a revolutionary concept in optical physics after studying the flight of a moth. He watched the animal use its wings to create lift..... ( find more in google)



 I already proved that exist DOPPLER inside Michelson Morley

 Distance  " d " exist because sensor is making rotation CW or CCW
 (below model please confirm in books - physics .
I showing here only to help You understand problem it is not new information )




NEW DISCOVERY ? ( NO ! old Doppler but  inside famous  test )
distance "d" for sensor and distance "d" for source
it is not the same distance  - R1<R2 !




XYZ space = cleare matheatica
real space is full of ENERGY
EM preasure = Aether
Aether is blocking energy's speed

C speed inside Aether
C max inside XYZ space ( zero outside EM preasure )


16
New Theories / Re: Double Slits how it works ?
« on: 01/04/2016 15:11:12 »


Light = many many small balls ?






17
New Theories / Re: Simple Question about force
« on: 01/04/2016 13:39:56 »
Quote from: Tim the Plumber on 01/04/2016 08:34:43
Quote from: marzosia2 on 01/04/2016 05:54:24
Quote from: Tim the Plumber on 31/03/2016 12:25:49

2, Force is experienced by the object upon which it acts. So it is irrelevant what other observers see or think.

GREAT !! VERY GOOD it is  FACT !!!!

F(a,b,c ) = FORCE

FORCE IT IS FUNCTION F(a,b,c) ! WE ARE 100% SURE that F IS ABSOLUTE !

a,b,c -  function's arguments !
 ( a= time , b = mass , c = distance )

NO!

Force is force. It is not dependant upon a, b or c. Your psudo-maths
drivel is utterly meaningless or worng.

If I was the moderator here you would be banned for being mad.


Tim the Plumber FORCE is NOT FORCE ! it has got Si symbol  [N] and exist relations between a,b,c ! Your post is New theory - do You have any evidence  or  it is your own words ?

18
New Theories / Re: Simple Question about force
« on: 01/04/2016 13:33:23 »

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Newton
Unit system    SI derived unit
Unit of    Force
Symbol    N 
Named after    Sir Isaac Newton
In SI base units:    kg ⋅ m/s2

OK

a= A [sec.] , b= B [kilogram]  , c= C [meters]

19
New Theories / Re: Simple Question about force
« on: 01/04/2016 05:54:24 »
Quote from: Tim the Plumber on 31/03/2016 12:25:49

2, Force is experienced by the object upon which it acts. So it is irrelevant what other observers see or think.

GREAT !! VERY GOOD it is  FACT !!!!

F(a,b,c ) = FORCE

FORCE IT IS FUNCTION F(a,b,c) ! WE ARE 100% SURE that F IS ABSOLUTE !

a,b,c -  function's arguments !
 ( a= time , b = mass , c = distance )

QUESTIONS  :

Q1:
FORCE IS ABSOLUTE ! CAN YOU TELL ME MORE ABOUT ARGUMENTS  ( absolute ? / relative? )  ?
 
Q2:
How to build absolute function and  do not use  absolute arguments ? ( POSSIBLE ? / IMPOSSIBLE ?)

EINSTEIN TOLD THAT:  ( a= time , b = mass , c = distance )   are relative !
please use mathematica...
CAN YOU TELL ME  MORE ABOUT HIS THEORY ? ( TRUE /FALSE ) ?


 Force ( relative variable a , relative variable b , relative variable c ) = F(a,b,c ) ???  No ! FALSE
 Force ( absolute variable a , absolute  variable b , absolute variable c ) = F(a,b,c ) ??? YES TRUE !!!

MATHEMATICA  IS ABLE  ALSO explain  MORE STRONGER FACT !  ...:

 Force ( relative variable a, absolute  variable b , absolute variable c ) = F(a,b,c ) ???  No ! FALSE
 Force ( absolute variable a , relative variable b , absolute variable c  ) = F(a,b,c ) ???  No ! FALSE
 Force ( absolute variable a , absolute  variable b ,relative variable c) = F(a,b,c ) ???  No ! FALSE


Quote from: Tim the Plumber on 31/03/2016 12:25:49
1, Don't use maths when you have no clue what you are doing. It's like arranging words in a pretty pattern. You could write a beautiful looking latin script but it would be meaningless. Same with maths, looking like maths is not the same as being maths.

very good argument please inform by Your e- mail  people in LIGO !


exist 3 options :

a) They are intelectual  ignorants !
 
b) They understand that You have right and they speculating TRUE ( dirty game )
They have many many  public moneys and  They are very strong organism
a lot of people  using this money
Typical asymetry situation
( small person (You ) is informing by e-mail  huge organisation about fact  that destroing this what They are doing many years.. )

c) In media and In  books we have not real informations
because ARMY protecting knowledge about VERY PRECISSION and CHEAP GPS

 
 - details ... please read about Doppler's mechanism
inside Michelson Morley ... I showed this on FORUM  ...) 
    
To find  Doppler I made many tests ( 2012 ---now )
5 years my own work without outside help
 ( nobody supporting people like me ... )
all my instruments and experiments I made my own hand !

GPS ? ...in universe exist 7-10 constant vectors ( SPEED )
to  explain You  position I need minimal 3 vectors.

I no need use stars or other objects
around Earth and on the Earth to exlain you X,Y,Z position
( SPEED it is not reall object
 we can compare speed to very special  constant wind !
wind's  direction/ speed/ force  = good information for people who are on the sea to find port )

 Earth own rotation is able inform you
 about geographic WIDE / and  level above sea !
I showed two Experiments
 ( Michelson Morley on Equator / North Pole) it will not  be the same Doppler
( the same instrument will not give the same resoults Equator/ North Pole )

30 km/s - Earth around SUN  vector
220 km/s - Earth and Sun around Galactica
....
......

EXIST ALSO OTHER IMPORTANT PROBLEM ( WE CAN MEASURE THIS PROBLEM )
I KEEPING THIS PROBLEM IN SECRET  !
 ( it will be very easy  for me to  show evidence  DAY and TIME that I made test )
this information will help me prove THAT I'm AUTHOR
( my family is not Rich - I not trust in TRUE
a lot of people like my ideas  )
 
topic on this forum :

Doppler's mechanism inside Michelson Morley
Started by marzosia2
   0 Replies
61 Views    Last post 30/03/2016 14:48:00
by marzosia2

20
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Newton and Doppler FLAT GRAVITY ?
« on: 31/03/2016 04:35:10 »
I alreardy explained  Doppler mechanism  on this forum

Doppler's mechanism inside Michelson Morley
« on: 30/03/2016 14:48:00 »

I want to ask about NEWTON here ( he directly copied Galileo )
Do we have symetry   inside atom ?

below my drawing
 Big M - atom's center
small m - atom's electron
bulb = EM source !  ( gravitation = EM wave )

exist  motion ?
 Atom's Center ↔ electron  exchanging informations by EM radiation
what about the signal's intensity ?


1861 J. C. Maxwell, published his theory of electromagnetic fields and radiation,which shows that light has momentum and thus can exert pressure on objects.

EM radiation is not moving with source


F1 = F2  or F1>F2  ???
How big signal's intensity is registering mass m left/right ?



 I'm not expert if we speak about Einstein
but can you help me explain SIGNAL's INTENSITY  inside Einstein's rocket



ACCELERTION = GRAVITATION ?

M- rocket's mass
m- person

if m is on the planet  reaction m- planet = constant

m
i
Planet



now situattion inside rocket

one  week
rocekt is accelerating , accelerating ....... accelerating

3 weeks later
rocekt is accelerating , accelerating ....... accelerating

How heavy is person inside rocket ?
I asking about Gravitation's force between rocket M mass and person m
 (this person will lost kilograms if exist comunication M↔m by EM pressure ? )



ACCELERTION = GRAVITATION ?

Acceleration each  second mass m  changing own Q ( NOT CONSTANT Q )

Planet ( real gravitation ) each second mass m not losting Q ( CONSTANT Q )



Exist also One problem more .... but  I not wan to add too much drawigns










Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.084 seconds with 64 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.