Naked Science Forum
Non Life Sciences => Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology => Topic started by: Voxx on 15/02/2013 04:37:37
-
Alright; again another one of my science fiction questions. I have been doing minuscule research on the topic, but I will tell what I have found out myself and let the experts school me on the rest.
1: It is technically impossible for humans to fly. We are simple not with the aerodynamic shape and the wings themselves would have to be over a hundred meters in length.
2: The Paragon Falcon is the fastest known creature within our world today (I don't know about the past). Although; the Anna Hummingbird can move over two hundred lengths of it's body faster than the falcon, but still is slower in clockwise speed.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Now on to my thoughts on my book.
I am allowed some leeway since it is science fiction and talking about creatures that are not exactly human.
1: To a slender human with the height of 5"2 and a wing span (can vary, maybe longer or shorter) of nearly eight meters. Rigidly bat textured(are bat textured wings meant for gliding, not flying?)
2: How far can I justify this with a difference in anatomy as in muscle fiber density, type, and/or strength.
3: Would the strength/resilience of the wings take into account anything like weight?
4: Weight can vary depending on your suggestions with muscle.
5: How would aerodynamics work with this wing shape and lugging around a human body?
I know what I ask may not be in your general expertise. I will consider any and all information you can illuminate me on.
-
is technically impossible for humans to fly.
Yes. It’s impossible. You have to add a mechanism to the body in order to let it fly.
I am allowed some leeway since it is science fiction and talking about creatures that are not exactly human.
1: To a slender human with the height of 5"2 and a wing span (can vary, maybe longer or shorter) of nearly eight meters. Rigidly bat textured(are bat textured wings meant for gliding, not flying?)
This isn’t phrased as a question. I assume that you’re asking if a human 5’2” could fly with a wing span of eight meters. I don’t believe so. The force exerted by the air on the wings would be much to great for a human to handle. However I don’t see it as being impossible for a bird to exist which is 5’2” tall having an 8 meter wing span. But then it wouldn’t be human any longer.
2: How far can I justify this with a difference in anatomy as in muscle fiber density, type, and/or strength.
I’m afraid that you’ve come to the wrong forum. You should try a discussion forum on physiology. Its that field of science which studies questions like this.
3: Would the strength/resilience of the wings take into account anything like weight?
If you’re asking whether the size and structure of the wings be determined by the weight of the body then yes.
-
It might all depend on what you consider flight.
If you are talking about gliding, like a flying squirrel.
Consider hang Gliders, or para sails.
You might also consider wingsuits (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wingsuit_flying). The biggest issue is landing, although apparently a few people have attempted chuteless landings.
-
It might all depend on what you consider flight.
If you are talking about gliding, like a flying squirrel.
Consider hang Gliders, or para sails.
You might also consider wingsuits (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wingsuit_flying). The biggest issue is landing, although apparently a few people have attempted chuteless landings.
I assume that he meant non-mechanized. And of course non-mechanized flight by humns is impossible. We need things to fly, like sails or winged jumpsuits (winged lilke a flying squirrel that is).
-
1. Humans have flown across the English Channel (or La Manche, for our French readers) in a human-powered aircraft, powered by a top athlete on a bicycle. The wingspan was 30 meters: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gossamer_Albatross
2. Fastest bird: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peregrine_Falcon
_________________
1. Bats can fly
3. Supporting human weight against the forces of gravity and air resistance requires a very light and strong material. It also requires energy that is close to the maximum that a human being can produce.
To overcome these barriers, you could imagine:
- Reduced gravity, such as flying inside a cavern on the Moon, or in an orbiting spaceship
- Thicker atmosphere than the Earth, but this would reduce speed
-
Yes; as Evan_an has stated, I am looking for a non-mechanical means to achieve this feat. I am trying to use the method I have already stated (flight with wings).
I see that the wings would have to be made of a light, yet durable membrane and also have enough power to fight against air pressure and gravity.
I know this question isn't technically a part of the physics forum, but it does have to do with physics in general as well as anatomy. How much stronger would the chest muscles have to be to support flight in this manner? Not necessarily more fiber, but more powerful fiber (amount < quality).
Thanks for the confirmation that bats actually do fly Evan_au.
Also; a tail is usually used as a stabilizer, correct? How do bat's get away with this exclusion, body shape, wing membrane?
-
I know this question isn't technically a part of the physics forum, but it does have to do with physics in general as well as anatomy. How much stronger would the chest muscles have to be to support flight in this manner? Not necessarily more fiber, but more powerful fiber (amount < quality).
The muscle tissue is all wrong for such flight. Holding the wings open during flight would be too hard no matter how strong you are. Also the muscle has to be able to endure sustained action. Think about how many times a bird either flaps his wings in flight or has to hold them up for sailing. A fixed wing would over come the sailing problem as it does with airplanes but you can’t have a fixed wing to start flying and for maneuvering. Don’t forget that birds have one advantage over us. Their bones are hollow so they don’t carry that weight with them
Also; a tail is usually used as a stabilizer, correct? How do bat's get away with this exclusion, body shape, wing membrane?
Perhaps. Not sure.
-
There is a photo here of a bat with a membrane between its rear legs and tail as a stabiliser: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bat
But they don't have a vertical stabiliser like a jet.
-
The muscle tissue is all wrong for such flight.
I get what you're saying, but what I'm trying to explain is a whole new muscle type. I know that human muscle fiber can't accomplish anything of the sort, but since this is a science fiction book and these creatures come from a different existence is it so hard to have a new fiber pattern?
The largest problem I am having to come up with is the bones as you have stated. Having hollow bones does make for an easier flight, but at the cost of durability (I know that I probably won't be able to outsmart evolution's billions of years in adaptation and solve the problem over night, but i'm trying to come up with a solution).
I know this question marks in a physiological section, but again it also has to do with aviation and lift (physics). If this creature had humanoid shape, but a completely different biological makeup and fiber pattern would it still be possible (in even a remote way)?
This also comes with the durability vs weight issue and stability/navigation, but I'm trying to work a problem at a time. I would also love some comments on thoughts you may have to help along the solution.
-
Well, there are nano carbon fiber 'muscles' corkscrewing and unwinding themselves. Maybe you could graft that kind of thing into a human? But, would that be a human anymore? We are too heavy, don't have hollow bones as the birds etc, and I think we have the wrong kind of muscles too.
-
Interesting; thank you for the comment! So these micro fibers or any other kind of fiber would add up to supply the strength of possible flight, but now on to the wing design. Bat like texture wings that are rigidly shaped; is there even any kind of real winged creature out there with those specifications? How do they fly (such as aerodynamically; a wiki page would be fine of course if anything pops up in your mind)
-
You could look at the pteranodon for inspiration. Not sure how much information is out there about muscle requirements and wing structure but if something the size of that can fly, it would be feasable to think a humanoid can.
If you're looking at science fiction, a dense atmosphere might help. We can swim easily in water because it is so dense. With slightly less gravity and slightly denser air, perhaps something that would seem clunky and non-aerodynamic on Earth, may be able to "fly".
You could also consider a plot point of a species that hasn't acheived full flight, but only some members have the physical attributes that allow it too, and only after training. The same way I can't climb everest or run 10 metres per second, but there are people that can. Then you have to consider why they have wings to begin with I guess.
-
The largest problem I am having to come up with is the bones as you have stated. Having hollow bones does make for an easier flight, but at the cost of durability (I know that I probably won't be able to outsmart evolution's billions of years in adaptation and solve the problem over night, but i'm trying to come up with a solution).
May I suggest bones made of titanium tubing?
I know this question marks in a physiological section, but again it also has to do with aviation and lift (physics). If this creature had humanoid shape, but a completely different biological makeup and fiber pattern would it still be possible (in even a remote way)?
Well, a lot of things are conceptually possible if you push the envelope far enough. Maybe the wings could be hollow structures of graphene filled with helium.
-
Do away with muscles as we know them, replacing them with hydraulic cylinders.
-
Do away with the heart and lungs, and replace them with a turbojet engine and hydraulic pump.
-
If one was to engineer a "wing suit" for bird-like flapping, one would hinge the wings so that when fully open, there is a physical stop so that it would take no energy to hold them open for gliding.
Thinking of birds vs humans, the birds tend to have very deep breast/pectoralis muscles. In general humans have rather shallow pecs, and thus poor leverage for operating wings.
If a hominid species had a deeper breast plate, perhaps one could generate the force to fly.
Our legs are the strongest muscles in the body. If one was to design a wing suit that utilized a rowing motion, then it would be best to use one's leg muscle group.
-
RIGHT! Stand by your beds.
Sorry Voxx, I have been a tad busy of late, but now I am here and ready and able to deal with your SF requirements.
Let the voice (well, typed word) of genius be heard (well, read).
Forget the wings, without a wishbone you're never going to get your airborne super hero, well, airborne.
Now your flying fictional fantasy needs a few modifications to the human form.
Think of the good ol' British Bobby.... (https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.zaazu.com%2Fimg%2Flondon-police-police-london-smiley-emoticon-000570-large.gif&hash=b5358e15da3e2322194b59c3308c4f53) Does your head go to the top of that helmet?
That's the first thing you need to alter, a pointy bonce is required for the aerodynamics. Keeping the Fuzz in mind, a huge pair of "plates o' meat" (feet) are also required to mimic the bird's tail, thus giving stability and steering to the flight.
Now to the all important means of propulsion. Again a modification is required, though this one will not be evident from an external view. This is great, since it gives your soaring spectacle the benefit of surprise, if'n you'll pardon the pun.
Your supersonic semi-sapien will require a bowl capable of withstanding immense pressure and a similarly super sphincter. Whatever you do, don’t forget the non return valve, or you'll end up with 'Round the World in Eighty Days' balloon instead of a devilish dart. Now for the diet, this will need to be 100% beans. I suggest flatulent flageolet beans might be best. All you need now is a self igniting posterior and perhaps a pair of afterburner underpants (worn over the trousers, of course) and its up, up and away...... (https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi300.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fnn31%2FUKStevieB%2Fukstevieb_smilies%2Fsuperman-flying-smiley.gif&hash=17b4db454467027cc7075ea0327f75c7)
-
RIGHT! Stand by your beds.
Sorry Voxx, I have been a tad busy of late, but now I am here and ready and able to deal with your SF requirements.
Let the voice (well, typed word) of genius be heard (well, read).
Forget the wings, without a wishbone you're never going to get your airborne super hero, well, airborne.
Now your flying fictional fantasy needs a few modifications to the human form.
Think of the good ol' British Bobby.... (https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.zaazu.com%2Fimg%2Flondon-police-police-london-smiley-emoticon-000570-large.gif&hash=b5358e15da3e2322194b59c3308c4f53) Does your head go to the top of that helmet?
That's the first thing you need to alter, a pointy bonce is required for the aerodynamics. Keeping the Fuzz in mind, a huge pair of "plates o' meat" (feet) are also required to mimic the bird's tail, thus giving stability and steering to the flight.
Now to the all important means of propulsion. Again a modification is required, though this one will not be evident from an external view. This is great, since it gives your soaring spectacle the benefit of surprise, if'n you'll pardon the pun.
Your supersonic semi-sapien will require a bowl capable of withstanding immense pressure and a similarly super sphincter. Whatever you do, don’t forget the non return valve, or you'll end up with 'Round the World in Eighty Days' balloon instead of a devilish dart. Now for the diet, this will need to be 100% beans. I suggest flatulent flageolet beans might be best. All you need now is a self igniting posterior and perhaps a pair of afterburner underpants (worn over the trousers, of course) and its up, up and away...... (https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi300.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fnn31%2FUKStevieB%2Fukstevieb_smilies%2Fsuperman-flying-smiley.gif&hash=17b4db454467027cc7075ea0327f75c7)
A very comical entrance there my friend! Alright; for clarification let me be a bit more specific on my specifications. Although; for redundancy tastes I decided to keep it a bit on the DL.
I am looking for a possible flight within a humanoid physique, but within the classical status of a demon.
Two horns two inches above the ear, they extend outwards (repelling each other) in a straight s shape and two more horns bellow them (above the ear) that extend more backwards and in a slant. She is female (someone was talking about a deeper chest cavity, maybe only females can fly; or maybe fat demons (jokes)). I was thinking about maybe a classical tail; (thin with a barb, but am open to suggestions; although, not a big fan of bird feathers (not a harpy, a demon)).
The climate and atmospheric pressure is the same as earth, but these demons have (demonic energy) that bolsters their physical strength. Also; people were talking about micro fibers, hollow bone structures with helium, but extremely durable bones, please no mechanic's (a different section of the book, this is all natural). The suggestions are fantastic and I can't wait for the helpful responses!
-
Ah! I seem to have gotten hold of the wrong end of the stick. I also seem to have equipped my flying fantasy with a bowl in place of a bowel. Well, even a genius can have a bad day.
Might I suggest that your demonic diva takes a leaf or two from the prehistoric Pterosaurs. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pterosaur). Though, strictly speaking, they were gliders rather than flyers, I'm sure with a little tweek here and there, you'll be able to overcome this minor detail. What's more, in true TNS style, you'll be able to fit an obtuse pun into the whole affair, when the frightened populous below shout "Run for cover, terror soars above."
MAD!?!?!? Little ol' moi!?!?!? Certainly not. The cheek of it, I'm not mad, I'm stark staring BONKERS!
-
Ah! I seem to have gotten hold of the wrong end of the stick. I also seem to have equipped my flying fantasy with a bowl in place of a bowel. Well, even a genius can have a bad day.
Might I suggest that your demonic diva takes a leaf or two from the prehistoric Pterosaurs. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pterosaur). Though, strictly speaking, they were gliders rather than flyers, I'm sure with a little tweek here and there, you'll be able to overcome this minor detail. What's more, in true TNS style, you'll be able to fit an obtuse pun into the whole affair, when the frightened populous below shout "Run for cover, terror soars above."
MAD!?!?!? Little ol' moi!?!?!? Certainly not. The cheek of it, I'm not mad, I'm stark staring BONKERS!
Salutations once again Don!
Haha! Love your responses (Is Don a pun for professor, maybe being the best at it in reference to the 1? Putting on a lab coat as Don means in spanish "put on" "wear" or maybe just that you are a male)? Just seemed to have peeked my interest.
True; they are gliders, I was looking at them and the Pteranodon seems to have a 7.5m (25ft) wing span, which is similar to what I was thinking. Although; I was imagining a rigid wing type, (not the most feasible premise, but all the same).
It also overlooks the process of navigation; I still need to solve this issue and I doubt a thin barbed tail would help in the least with such a feat?
Thank you for the directional nudge Don!
-
Haha! Love your responses (Is Don a pun for professor,
ME!!! Professor??? (https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freesmileys.org%2Fsmileys%2Fsmiley-laughing021.gif&hash=44605df69e1507c3ed4d235c15c22e92) (http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys.php) Can you get a PhD in idiocy?
I shall give more thought to your request in true Shylock Gnomes fashion. Where's my pipe and violin? (https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.smiley-lol.com%2Fsmiley%2Fmusique%2Fmusicien%2Fvioloniste.gif&hash=fafe5ff38dac8ea4cbcc4b247952950e) Some people just don't know good music when they hear it. Obviously he does!
As far as navigation goes, banking to one side or 'tuther will induce a turn, a rudder is not required. Just take a look at one of masters of the air, such as a Herring Gull. It can seem to hang in the air stationary for ages by no more than trimming its wings when head on to the wind, then a simple banking will take it off in the desired direction. It has been suggested that the crest on the Pteranadon's head might have played a part in its navigation.
Now I think I read somewhere, that you weren't too keen on feathers, but a look at the ancient Egyptian goddess Isis or perhaps Horus or Ma'at might be of some assistance. Failing that try Camazotz, the Mayan god of Bats. There again, you could just look to Bats for a little inspiration. Try the Giant Fruit Bat (http://www.bbc.co.uk/nature/life/Megabat).
But, if you want a real terrifying old bat, we can be of great assistance to each other. Just as soon as the Mrs gets home, I'll shove her in a strong box and post her off to you. (https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freesmileys.org%2Fsmileys%2Fsmiley-devil06.gif&hash=55eea77691d4fdd8ad9b8a8a4c4596b4) (http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys.php) LOOK OUT!!! Here she comes now! (https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freesmileys.org%2Fsmileys%2Fsmiley-scared007.gif&hash=086de4a619b2c6cef8205d634f3af880) (http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys.php) Sorry, I chickened out, is it safe to come out now? (https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freesmileys.org%2Fsmileys%2Fsmiley-scared003.gif&hash=51759f83600b800f09deb645ece3b809) (http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys.php)
-
I honestly love your humor!
Iris, Horus and Ma'at do have wings indeed; I should have been clearer in saying that is not the direction I want to take with their appearance.
Google imaging Camazotz I found that the rigid shaped wings were quite similar to what I was imagining, but that isn't what I am concerned about. I'm just trying to come up with a physical (feasible) way to accomplish sustained flight with tight aviation. Nice references!
You have thrown the Herring Gull into the brain pool, a wonderful thought. An absolutely brilliant idea with the Pteranodons on the other hand! I hadn't even considered horn like aviation.
I doubt I can run it in any kind of scientific sense, but could the four horns (being stationary) be used to acquire maneuverability?
-
Iris, Horus and Ma'at do have wings indeed;
No, no; Isis, not a flying eyeball (https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Feyemakeart.files.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F04%2Fflying-eyeball.gif%3Fw%3D632&hash=29acbf135493f16d4ff62de78e18db61)
I doubt I can run it in any kind of scientific sense, but could the four horns (being stationary) be used to acquire maneuverability?
I see no reason why not. Not all horns are round in nature. Some goats have a more flattened horn. You could have two pointy, round horns pointing forward and behind them two flattened, back sweeping horns sort of boomerang shaped and even put a folding flap on them somewhat like the 'wings' of a flying fish. Moving the head side to side would then give a rudder type reaction.
I would demonstrate what I mean, but I threw my boomerang away and it didn't come back (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uoBXAUNU1HE).
-
Does it have to be earth?
Imagine a planet with a less gravity, but some denser composition of a atmosphere? Is that possible?
Think that was Cliffords suggestion originally by the way. Or can you make a atmosphere, possible to breath for humans, denser? Not by adding mass but by the sheer outrageous composition of it??
And use hollow bones, why should you avoid it if all birds use it? A bird not good enough for you huh :)
-
I can't take credit for the gravity/density notes.
To overcome these barriers, you could imagine:
- Reduced gravity, such as flying inside a cavern on the Moon, or in an orbiting spaceship
- Thicker atmosphere than the Earth, but this would reduce speed
If you're looking at science fiction, a dense atmosphere might help. We can swim easily in water because it is so dense. With slightly less gravity and slightly denser air, perhaps something that would seem clunky and non-aerodynamic on Earth, may be able to "fly".
Titan (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titan_(moon)) might be a good place to try flying, with an atmospheric pressure of 146.7 kPa = 1.44 ATM, and it has a gravity of 0.14g. It is downright chilly on Titan, but based on the ideal gas law, PV=nRT, the low temperatures would further increase the atmospheric density.
Venus might also be a good place, if it wasn't so hot there. Its atmosphere is several times denser than Earth, even though the gravity is similar.
The density of the atmosphere of Venus at the surface is 67 kg/m3, or about 54 times the density of air on Earth, and about 6.5% that of liquid water.
Keep in mind that swimming is like flying in water, with our bodies being about the same density of water.
Jupiter would also be a unique place. The gravity is about 2.5x the gravity of Earth. However, the atmosphere goes through a range of being less dense than the air on the surface of Earth, to denser than water.
Of course, we can't breathe the air on any known planet or moon other than Earth, but it would give ideas for fiction.
-
It should be noted that there is work on making extremely light materials.
Silica Aerogel (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerogel)
Aerographite (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerographite)
Metallic Microlattice (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallic_microlattice)
Engineering a small, lightweight, rigid, significantly lighter than air solid is an extremely high standard to meet. We do, of course, have blimps, but that may not be desired.
However, on Venus, with an atmosphere density 54x that of Earth, a lightweight wing structure could give a significant amount of flotation. However, it would have to be designed to not absorb the Venus atmosphere, and not collapse under the pressure. I.E. You drop a helium balloon to the surface of Venus, and it will still produce lift, but it would shrink considerably.
Consider what happens to a foam cup when attached to a submarine. (http://teacheratsea.wordpress.com/category/dave-grant/)
[ Invalid Attachment ]
Still, one could potentially build a rigid collapsible framework like a camping tent that could have lower than atmospheric pressure inside, again most useful in a high density atmosphere.
-
Great ideas, but not the way I was intending to path my book (also thanks for correcting me on the Iris blunder, don't know what I was thinking at the time [;D]).
Like I have stated, I want the same aspects as our current earth standards (However; the demon universe or mainly the world they live on could be of lighter/heavier density). I am fine with the hollow bones theory, but the problem I am thinking about has to do with the density/durability of these bones.
I need them to be as hard as steel, yet light enough to carry my winged demon off the ground in our world's natural dimensions. I will list the problems bellow to try and get my dilemma off more clearly.
Unacceptable:
- Machinery/Bionics - I am looking for a natural evolutionary answer.
- Shifting our worlds natural order to accommodation a solution
Problems:
- Bone Density - I can do hollow bones, but I need a way for them to be durable/light when needing to take off and dense enough to stay grounded when needed.
- Wing Substance - I need her wings to be strong, able to get her air born, and be durable enough to say take a bullet.
- New Question - What does a slit pupil (like a cat) actually do (view the world)?
A hard task and any kind of method (carbon structure) or anything you can think of would be of help!
Problems Possibly Solved
- Navigation - As stated above, navigating by wind current manipulation through head (horn) movement (Still wrapping my head around this one).
p.s. I just realized how close this is getting more into the biology section rather than physics (although; still an issue with physics, but requires a biological answer).
-
Keep in mind that our bones ARE hollow.
Just not made in the same filamentous truss form of avian bones.
They are, of course filled with marrow.
Shoot a bird's wing in the right place, and it will hardly ruffle the feathers.
Shoot it in the wrong place, it can break a bone, a critical life threatening injury.
Likewise, if you shot pin sized bullets at a bat's wing, you would have a good chance it would pass through the wing causing little harm to the animal, as long as it would not bleed significantly.
The big thing would be to either have a bullet pass through the feathers, or to puncture, but not tear the skin. Perhaps having limited bleeding and rapid annealing of the wound.
-
That could be the process; but it is a membranous like wing substance (like a bat I guess as I have stated). Is there any kind of fiber like material or maybe different infrastructural that would give the wing such strength, yet lightness?
-
Hollow bones are amongst the strongest structures known as I get it, relative its mass. Apply a force on a hollow bone and it will 'flow' around it, to break that bone it will be much easier to twist it than just trying to 'split it' in two, which is why the worst and most usual bone breaks comes from twisting forces. And you need a denser atmosphere, lighter bone structure, maybe using some incredibly surprisingly strong nano carbon structure (filaments building that hollow bone). There is a reason why nature gives different species what they have, and it has to do with a planets mass, the atmosphere (oxygen content etc) and what the animal does, as flying. I think Don was thinking in the right way there looking back in time and place, if it is Earth you want to use? Otherwise you can use a lot of stuff :) Mini black holes rotating inside a hollow world should give a lot of exciting effects for example, depending on how stable your configuration needs to be. On the other hand there do not exist anything stable in the universe, as far as I know. All systems are non linear, if combined dynamically, observed over a time period long enough.
-
Hollow bones are amongst the strongest structures known as I get it, relative its mass. Apply a force on a hollow bone and it will 'flow' around it, to break that bone it will be much easier to twist it than just trying to 'split it' in two, which is why the worst and most usual bone breaks comes from twisting forces. And you need a denser atmosphere, lighter bone structure, maybe using some incredibly surprisingly strong nano carbon structure (filaments building that hollow bone). There is a reason why nature gives different species what they have, and it has to do with a planets mass, the atmosphere (oxygen content etc) and what the animal does, as flying. I think Don was thinking in the right way there looking back in time and place, if it is Earth you want to use? Otherwise you can use a lot of stuff :) Mini black holes rotating inside a hollow world should give a lot of exciting effects for example, depending on how stable your configuration needs to be. On the other hand there do not exist anything stable in the universe, as far as I know. All systems are non linear, if combined dynamically, observed over a time period long enough.
Thank you for the illuminance; I do intend these creatures to be able to fly "on an earth like atmosphere," but they're evolutionary point of origin can be of any kind of dimensional aspects. I'm just trying to come up with a way for them to fly on this kind of atmosphere while having evolved on the other (make sense, and is it possible)?
-
No, it's not possible, not as I can see now anyway. But maybe your creatures are planning to make it possible? In that case, will they also allow humanity to exist :) and breath, in that new atmosphere?
==
This is assuming that they indeed evolved from some denser atmosphere. The smaller you make something the stronger it becomes though, relative its mass, biologically seen. A spiders legs should break under its mass, if I got it right, when extrapolated to the size of a human.
-
No, it's not possible, not as I can see now anyway. But maybe your creatures are planning to make it possible? In that case, will they also allow humanity to exist :) and breath, in that new atmosphere?
==
This is assuming that they indeed evolved from some denser atmosphere. The smaller you make something the stronger it becomes though, relative its mass, biologically seen. A spiders legs should break under its mass, if I got it right, when extrapolated to the size of a human.
What about multiple organs? Say like a two hearts (maybe more?) that can work through the blood flow to make the speed of the wings beat faster? I know that the hummingbird is technically the quickest flying creature if based on body mass (blows the paragon falcon out of the water). Not to mention the maneuverability. Am I getting the completely wrong idea for this?
-
You mentioned "demonic energy". Perhaps this is somehow related to the conversion of mass to energy in which case her mass could be reduced and energy increased (although I'd imagine the reduction in mass would be negligible and the increase in energy would be astronomical).
Or perhaps she can somehow interrupt the theoretical Higgs field and become as massless as she needs to obtain flight on any planet?
I would have thought the multiple organs argument is a bit like fuelling a rocket. The more fuel you use, the heavier the rocket and the more fuel you need...
but I don't have any figures I'm sorry.
-
You mentioned "demonic energy". Perhaps this is somehow related to the conversion of mass to energy in which case her mass could be reduced and energy increased (although I'd imagine the reduction in mass would be negligible and the increase in energy would be astronomical).
Or perhaps she can somehow interrupt the theoretical Higgs field and become as massless as she needs to obtain flight on any planet?
I would have thought the multiple organs argument is a bit like fuelling a rocket. The more fuel you use, the heavier the rocket and the more fuel you need...
but I don't have any figures I'm sorry.
Helpful without flaw! Thank you for the thought. I haven't gotten into Higg's Field theory, but the Demonic Energy is in essence pulled from their own dimension. So in sense it could: fuel their energy output by an enormous amount (as you said), Create a sphere of sorts that pulls them into that kind of dimensional zone (thereby causing them to have the same atmospheric properties as their home, or plain have their mass reduced because of the torrent of energy being able to lessen their density and reform it when needed to defend (of course they would fall out of the sky because of weight, but it only need be for a second to repel the attack).
What do you think is the best option (scientifically)?
-
Helpful without flaw! Thank you for the thought. I haven't gotten into Higg's Field theory, but the Demonic Energy is in essence pulled from their own dimension. So in sense it could: fuel their energy output by an enormous amount (as you said), Create a sphere of sorts that pulls them into that kind of dimensional zone (thereby causing them to have the same atmospheric properties as their home, or plain have their mass reduced because of the torrent of energy being able to lessen their density and reform it when needed to defend (of course they would fall out of the sky because of weight, but it only need be for a second to repel the attack).
What do you think is the best option (scientifically)?
I can't comment scientifically and I think that once you get into the realm of "extra-dimensional demons" then it is difficult to do so anyway.
I can comment from the point of view of a reader of science fiction and say that the dimensional bubble idea would annoy me and make me wonder how exactly this creature would interact with the world they were in, what happens to the displaced area of the bubble and if a creature has this much ability, why is it even bothering to be in another world and fighting like a common flesh-slave (ie. us!).
If it possessed the ability to alter itself within certain confinements (again, too much power and why does it even bother using matter?) it would be much more plausible to me and create more reason to have to physically interact with it's surroundings, as well as introduce weakness which could be exploited.
-
Helpful without flaw! Thank you for the thought. I haven't gotten into Higg's Field theory, but the Demonic Energy is in essence pulled from their own dimension. So in sense it could: fuel their energy output by an enormous amount (as you said), Create a sphere of sorts that pulls them into that kind of dimensional zone (thereby causing them to have the same atmospheric properties as their home, or plain have their mass reduced because of the torrent of energy being able to lessen their density and reform it when needed to defend (of course they would fall out of the sky because of weight, but it only need be for a second to repel the attack).
What do you think is the best option (scientifically)?
I can't comment scientifically and I think that once you get into the realm of "extra-dimensional demons" then it is difficult to do so anyway.
I can comment from the point of view of a reader of science fiction and say that the dimensional bubble idea would annoy me and make me wonder how exactly this creature would interact with the world they were in, what happens to the displaced area of the bubble and if a creature has this much ability, why is it even bothering to be in another world and fighting like a common flesh-slave (ie. us!).
If it possessed the ability to alter itself within certain confinements (again, too much power and why does it even bother using matter?) it would be much more plausible to me and create more reason to have to physically interact with it's surroundings, as well as introduce weakness which could be exploited.
Thank you for the constructive criticism; alright then, what about using this energy I have stated above as a point of medium. It would use this energy (that is linked to it's dimension) to either enhance offensive, flight (maneuverability), and defensive properties.
Strengths:
1) This could compensate for physical weakness.
2) Has the possibility of being exponentially powerful dependent on personal energy levels (are you thinking about DBZ with this comment [???]).
3) This energy could also be used as a harnessable power.
Weaknesses
1) When the energy runs out they might be considered weaker than a normal human.
2) Just being in our dimension (might) decrease their energy levels (haven't decided yet, your thoughts on this?).
3) When transferring energy from the three stated categories they are at a zero equilibrium within their energy (no energy offense, defense or maneuverability).
There could be a whole mess of things that I could go on, but I would like to know your opinion on the idea.