« on: 06/11/2018 20:26:35 »
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
the accretion disc temperature of the SMBH was 10 ^9 , and the temperature of a star's core is 10^6....I'm afraid not, because there is more to it than just temperature.
A star at 10^6 is fusing hydrogen into helium. At a higher temperature (an accretion disk) would be fusing the heavier elements
a strange barren area of the universe which was much colder than the rest of spaceThe diagram you presented is the Cosmic Background Radiation map.
The illuminous region around the BH's gravitational field represents it's external boundaryThere is a region called the "photon sphere", which is outside the event horizon (at 50% greater radius). If you emitted a flash of light here, you would see a series of light echoes as photons from the flash repeatedly orbit the black hole.
The illuminous region around the BH's gravitational field represents ... is a reflection of the incoming light striking a mass.If there is no infalling matter (eg from a closely-orbiting companion star) then there is no mass between the photosphere and the event horizon (...if you ignore the hypothetical, microscopically thin, microwave-shifted skin of star matter that fell into the event horizon when the black hole first formed).
This reflection is similar to what occurs on a star, The cooler substrata below the star's surface creates a barrier that the hotter corona reflect off of. During a coronal () we see the cooler substrata mass.I am not sure what "coronal" event you are talking about - maybe a Coronal Mass Ejection, or the Corona that is visible during an eclipse by the Moon?
Light trapped by this monopole's singularity gravitational force also is without a wave dynamic, because of the monolithic nature of the monopoles gravity (no waves). So, with no Light waves...This post seems to be suggesting that there can be no light waves within a black hole (ie no light and no photons)?
(A Black Hole) cannot be made of normal matter. That part is wrong. Normal matter of that mass cannot support its own weight, and breaks down even before the black hole forms.I think it is just a matter of grammatical tense here.
Is a BH empty? If it rotates, the answer needs to be no.We expect that most black holes will form with the angular momentum of their parent star, accretion disk or galaxy.
The black hole, is a singularity, it is comprised of unattached subatomic particlesA black hole singularity in general relativity is where all of the particles end up at a single point; all paths entering the event horizon end up at the singularity.
a chiralty gravitational effectGravitational waves are polarized.
...an argument I've been honing over time... I'll post an explanation as a new post in this thread as soon as it is written.Merger of black holes (or merger of two neutron stars to form a black hole) is mainstream science, based on scientific observation of the real world.
to what extent is 'entourage effect' been studied?The entourage effect seems to be more "magical incantation" rather than "scientific evidence"..