The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Profile of alancalverd
  3. Show Posts
  4. Messages
  • Profile Info
    • Summary
    • Show Stats
    • Show Posts
      • Messages
      • Topics
      • Attachments
      • Thanked Posts
      • Posts Thanked By User
    • Show User Topics
      • User Created
      • User Participated In

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

  • Messages
  • Topics
  • Attachments
  • Thanked Posts
  • Posts Thanked By User

Messages - alancalverd

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 711
1
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 17:34:35 »
Hey, I've learned something here! I didn't realise ice cores could be read to such finesse over recent periods. Many thanks.

Now all we need to do is explain why the temperature was higher 500 years ago when there was less CO2 around.

2
COVID-19 / Re: Does whistling help spread Covid?
« on: Yesterday at 17:29:42 »
There was a lot of fuss about choirs and brass bands a couple of years ago but the statistics have more to do with the concentration of sources and receptors than the production of sound. I play the tuba. It looks like a perfect COVID-cannon but in fact the exhaust velocity is very low: if I have to sustain a note for 15 seconds, that's only half a lungful of air and thus about the rate I would normally breathe out!

Whistling, on the other hand, does project a high velocity airstream, as does playing a flute, so although the volume of air will be the same, the stream doesn't disperse  as broadly as from a larger instrument - we are talking hose jet rather than fan - so you might project an infectious dose towards one victim rather than spread it relatively harmlessly among several.

3
Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution / Re: Why doesn't evolution revert when environments change back?
« on: Yesterday at 17:15:58 »
Stress doesn't make the change but selects for those natural variants that can tolerate it. Given the enormous range of possible variants and the quasicontinuous nature of evolution, the probability of a random mutation exactly matching a previous version, multiplied by the likelihood that the environment had itself reverted precisely (i.e. no new predators or diseases have persisted)  is extremely small.   

That said, it may indeed be possible to deliberately re-engineer an extinct species if we know enough about its critical genome sequences, and several people are working on recreating the woolly mammoth.

4
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: What happens when photons leave the sun?
« on: Yesterday at 17:09:00 »
Doppler shift depends on the relative velocity of source and receiver. You can calculate the gravitational red shift knowing the sun's surface gravity is about 28g and assuming a massless receiver or one at 1g on the earth's surface. The spectrum will certainly be spread a bit by scattering from the solar wind.

5
General Science / Re: Is it safe to transport hydrogen gas compressed into a water tank?
« on: Yesterday at 17:03:42 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on Yesterday at 12:51:34
For the benefit of those who don't understand the problem...
Burning methane creates CO2.
Who's talking about burning anything? This guy just wants to transport 40 tonnes of hydrogen in one manageable shipment. He could do so by shifting 320 tonnes of liquid methane (or 350 tonnes of ammonia, as you suggested) and extracting the hydrogen at the destination, but however he does it, he will need a barge, not a truck.

6
General Science / Re: Is it safe to transport hydrogen gas compressed into a water tank?
« on: Yesterday at 16:58:21 »
You could use it to put the fire out, if hydrogen were a dense solid.

7
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 11:27:00 »
Never mind the links. How do you think anyone came up with a definitive value for something that changes randomly with time and hadn't been discovered on the day they chose, 300 years before they were born? In my book there is measurement, and there is guesswork. And we don't base science on guesswork.

8
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 10:49:37 »
Quote from: yor_on on 17/05/2022 17:55:49
There's a difference to idiots. Some are just ignorant, which doesn't imply that they are idiots.
Are you familiar with Kruger-Dunning Syndrome?   Worth a google: it will amuse you, then horrify you as you recognise it in people with power and influence.

9
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 10:47:36 »
Quote from: yor_on on 17/05/2022 19:17:18
up to three times as much pollen wafting around by the end of the century.
But isn't climate change supposed to decimate agriculture? On my planet more pollen = more crops. It's all about sex. 

10
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 10:45:12 »
Quote from: yor_on on Yesterday at 06:41:21
What I was referring to was the greenhouse concentration around 1700

Given that the gas wasn't identified at all before 1750, who measured its atmospheric concentration, and how? 

You could admit that your "baseline" figure is arbitrary, but if not, you'll need to cite a credible source.

11
General Science / Re: Is it safe to transport hydrogen gas compressed into a water tank?
« on: Yesterday at 10:42:00 »
Or methane - less corrosive than ammonia and the source of much industrial hydrogen nowadays.

Hydrogen storage in palladium is a popular process if container weight isn't a problem.

But if you really need 40 tonnes of payload in one shipment, liquefaction is probably the only practicable method, and you'll need a barge to carry 600,000 liters. The good news is that the fractional losses from a tank of that size will be very small. 

12
Just Chat! / Re: Should we report all people to the police if we find them with child porn?
« on: Yesterday at 01:06:36 »
It always struck me as odd that being in possession of an image of some crimes is a crime, but not of others. Every christian church has at least one graphic depiction of a hate crime, and some people like to wear a representation of an instrument of torture in public, presumably to signify their approval. Some even symbolically practice cannibalism on Sundays. But nobody is ever prosecuted for it. Is antisemitism really that deeply ingrained into western culture that such abominations are excusable?

Apropos child porn, I find naked cherubs repulsive but there are plenty on the walls of public art galleries. Is the medium really the message?

A year or so ago I watched a TV documentary about life on a warship. At one point the Marines were tooling up to board an enemy gunboat and beat the crap out of the baddies. They set off, armed to the teeth in a helicopter and a couple of boats, then cut to the adverts. As the program resumed, the announcer warned that the following full color record of real life bloodbath and mayhem  "contains offensive language". 

Who draws the lines, and where?

13
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 00:56:37 »
Quote from: yor_on on 17/05/2022 21:06:10
The 'normal' concentration of carbon dioxide (or all green house gasses) is taken from the 1700:s and about 280 ppm.
Why is that considered "normal"? It isn't even a historic average. And who measured it to ± 5 parts per million in the 1700s, given that the gas was only identified in 1754  (methane 1778)? And surely the fact that the world was warmer then (which we know from finding plants under retreating glaciers) than in the 1960s, implies that CO2 is not responsible for warming?

That's the problem with facts. They get in the way of climate science.

14
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is there a limit to how hot things can get?
« on: Yesterday at 00:36:52 »
So you always withdraw money whilst checking your bank account, because you don't believe numbers that don't change?

You do have a small point. If the vertical speed indicator doesn't fluctuate a bit, there may be a problem. Happened to a couple of chaps flying a glider in Scotland in the 1970s. They flew into falling snow but weren't panicked because the air was smooth, the wings were level, and the top right instrument (altimeter) showed a constant 1200 feet. After a few minutes it occurred to them that the airspeed indicator (top left) was reading zero, which is not good. Turned out they had  grazed the top of a hill and come gently to rest in a snowdrift.  Houseflies have more sense than to take to the air in a snowstorm.

15
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: 17/05/2022 19:53:22 »
Quote from: yor_on on 17/05/2022 17:30:52
And 1.5 Celsius will be passed this decade.
"And" is not "therefore". What will you do if the temperature continues to increase long after the CO2 level decreases? And who will you blame if the temperature drops before the CO2 level? 

16
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is there a limit to how hot things can get?
« on: 17/05/2022 19:50:11 »
You would do well to review the basic physics of thermoelectricity. Standard thermocouples and thermopiles have a known temperature coefficient of voltage. If you buy a cheapish digital multimeter it will probably come with a Type K thermocouple and thermistor compensation block that you just plug in to the meter and measure temperatures to better than ±0.1K.

Come on, PC, this is very simple, robust engineering hardware. The guy who repaired my cooker had one in his bag.

17
Chemistry / Re: How well understood is the Chemistry of the trans-uranic elements?
« on: 17/05/2022 17:17:16 »
Up to about element 98 they are sufficiently stable for "ordinary" laboratory chemistry, with plutonium (94) and americium (95) actually having industrial applications.

18
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is there a limit to how hot things can get?
« on: 17/05/2022 16:08:12 »
At some point in your schooldays you should have been introduced to zero-current potentiometric measurements, the Wheatstone bridge, or some other classic null device. If not, I  can only recommend that you review a basic physics text. All we are doing here is a heat-flow null using rate of change to indicate the null point.

Here's a basic aircraft instrument panel. When the dial on the lower right shows zero  rate of change you are neither climbing nor descending so your lift vector equals your weight. 

It is true that some physics students (and some pilots) achieve a null balance by pure chance, but most of us do it by successive approximation.

Photon coupling with mirrors is not luck.

19
Just Chat! / Re: How to contact a scientist?
« on: 17/05/2022 13:24:49 »
Just remembered (in the midst of a seminar on the subject!) another ambition: to re-evaluate the relative biological effectiveness of low-energy alpha radiation. This could have a significant effect on several industries from pottery to nuclear fuel reprocessing.

20
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: 17/05/2022 11:35:21 »
Quote from: yor_on on 16/05/2022 05:21:56
Alan, open a new thread instead where you can debate your thoughts. You're becoming a politician here.
Funny, that . I write about atmospheric gases and biology, and you call me a politician. You write about NATO and referenda and call yourself a scientist. Fluency in English is useful, but Newspeak is disgraceful.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 711
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.071 seconds with 65 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.