0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
So, once again, what evidence do you have that either SR or GR is wrong (in their field of application)?
In their field of app? Are there?
GPS corrections (SR reasoned) is fully maniplation. Because the tolerance of GPS ~70 cm > 0.012 cm (GPS correction). Please calculate and examine the results.
I explained them in my book " Pseudo Science". Simpliest one: Einstein said that "perpendicular light does not cause time dilation because of zero projection to source's way. Alright, How does the clock (on K') simultaneously indicate the proper time and slowing time ? And, in deed; different dilation ratios of on other angles.
But attention please: they considered the relative speed of natural muons according to Earth.
SR has many contradictions. I explained them in my book " Pseudo Science". Simpliest one: Einstein said that "perpendicular light does not cause time dilation because of zero projection to source's way."
Alright, How does the clock (on K') simultaneously indicate the proper time and slowing time ?
Mixing metric with feet?
Just so you know, SR indeed assumes the special case of flat space, so no gravity, but it handles acceleration just fine. It just requires integration over time and the changing inertial reference frames. If acceleration is instant or trivially short, even that integration isn't necessary.
Quote from: xersanozgen on 24/07/2019 09:24:45 I explained them in my book " Pseudo Science". Simpliest one: Einstein said that "perpendicular light does not cause time dilation because of zero projection to source's way. Alright, How does the clock (on K') simultaneously indicate the proper time and slowing time ? And, in deed; different dilation ratios of on other angles. I am not going to get a copy of your book, so you need to explain what you mean here.
There have been similar events in history. For example, when Darwin published the origin of species, ...
I have learned that the reader must be neutral in order to properly evaluate this study
The Galaxies were not known at 1905 yet.
To be continued.
What presupposition? The speed of light measured relative to Earth is the same as the speed of light measured relative to the sun, or relative to any other frame. That's not true of anything else.It is not a presupposition of relativity, it was an empirical observation.
However, the special theory of relativity is based on the fact that the photon is always moving away from its source with the speed c
Quote from: xersanozgen on 29/08/2019 12:16:14However, the special theory of relativity is based on THE FACT / THE SPECULATION that the photon is always moving away from its source with the speed c. In the reference frame of the source, it is.
However, the special theory of relativity is based on THE FACT / THE SPECULATION that the photon is always moving away from its source with the speed c.