1

New Theories / Re: Re: Concerns, is everything in the universe in motion???

« on: 23/02/2021 14:14:08 »

The vibration in the invisible entities would increase, but the speed of the absolute motion would not. The quantity of motion increases, but not the speed of it.

The invisible entities rotate.  No matter how much you heat them......they will continue to rotate at that constant speed.  Only the jiggle, or the wobble of those rotations increase.

This jiggle increase also happens under g or any acceleration.  We currently use this jiggle for our clocks.  And this is why some think that time changes, but in truth, only the clock tick rate changes.  IF we were to use the rotational rate, instead of the wobble(or oscillatory) rate......you would measure a single, absolute time.   Just like the rest of nature sees.

2

New Theories / New Theory: is everything in the universe in motion???

« on: 23/02/2021 13:34:33 »

Motion is absolute.  Set two marbles with a zero relative velocity on your desk.  They are in constant motion.  The invisible entities that make matter are in constant motion.  That motion is the fastest motion possible.  You will never find a physical entity that is not in constant motion.  Whether that entity is mass or field.....it is in motion.

Motion is very different than velocity.  Velocity may be relative, but motion is absolute.

3

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is everything in the universe in motion?

« on: 23/02/2021 11:39:55 »

It does not matter what frame you are in.   EVERYTHING is in motion.  Everything ALL the TIME.   It's a pillar of physicality.

4

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Why don’t we use Mars as a life experiment.

« on: 22/02/2021 01:55:06 »

Life needs more than just an environment.   It needs other life forms to survive.  It's like a network.  Life exchanges resources back and forth.

5

New Theories / Re: THE GREATEST HOAX IN THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE!

« on: 22/02/2021 00:45:59 »

That is not a hoax, it's just a mis-understanding.   The greatest hoax is c.   It has a relative velocity.   And the second greatest hoax is space-time.  Time is a singularity.   

6

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Why don’t we use Mars as a life experiment.

« on: 22/02/2021 00:22:58 »

Because you or we, can not.  Try it.   It will die.  Life can not live on Mars or anywhere else.   It's that simple.    If life could live anywhere else........it would have.    Life is not natural in this universe.

7

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: What do we do about the orbiting space junk?

« on: 18/02/2021 00:27:32 »

I would look at it in a different way.....and propose a proof of concept experiment.  We track the big pieces with radar.  I would put a UV or x-ray laser in orbit, and see if we could ionize the junk object, and see what affect it had on it's orbit.    I would not rely on any simulation or opinions.  If that alone doesn't work, a magnetic field can decelerate the charged object. Space robot cowboys.

But even if we could remove the large junk, there is still a great problem, and that is all the "speck" junk.  Perhaps a high powered x-ray emitter, to ionize, flying in a grid search fashion, might charge the specks.

8

Physiology & Medicine / Re: Please someone tell me how to get this yellow fungus off my skin

« on: 17/02/2021 07:25:34 »

I picked up some kind of Chinese buffalo fungus in 1999.  Long story.  Anyhow the fungus is on both legs, just above the ankles.  Have been prescribed several creams thru the years, but that crud always comes back.

I'm thinking of trying a high UV source and see what happens.

9

General Science / Re: Is it possible to measure the weight of clouds?

« on: 17/02/2021 06:41:12 »

I don't believe there is a standard way to measure the weight of a cloud.  But if you can determine the volume of the white sky(cloud) in liters.......and if you assume the density is constant thru-out......Then filter the water out of one liter of it.......you can multiply that water weight by the volume of cloud in liters.

That will be the weight of the cloud.

10

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Why is light bent whent it passes a massive body in the space?

« on: 17/02/2021 02:38:51 »

When we bowed light, we did not have lasers.  We used a flashlight.  White light.  Bowed white light.  Full of phase and wavelength.

What term do you use to describe the path of light.......that passes into a WIDE boundary interface......AND...... that wide interface has a density gradient?

11

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Why is light bent whent it passes a massive body in the space?

« on: 16/02/2021 00:46:47 »

There are several ways to "bend" something.  One change in direction can be a bend.....so a bounce can be called a bend.  A sequential series of bounces, can also be called a bend. 

And a continuous change in direction can be called a bend.   I call it a bow, to tell the difference between them.  These are different dynamics.  Different motions.

I have never liked the term bend.....when it comes to a straw in water.  I think of it as a displaced reflection.

Plain water at equal temp, has the same density.  At least, in an aquarium.  The sugar gives the water a density gradient with the same temp.  This density gradient does not bounce......it continuously bows the light.

Do you believe that the atmosphere of the sun has a density gradient?   It's a plasma gradient.  We are not very familiar with plasma gradients......like other gradients, because plasma is reactive.  It's not neutral.  I expect the bow to be different with a reactive gradient.  A twist in polarity might easily cause a bow.

Do you think that there could be a plasma gradient around a galaxy?

Do our galaxy bubbles have a density gradient?

Evidence is subjective, that's why we have so much of it.

12

Marine Science / Re: What the best ratio of fish to tank size, for a fish farm?

« on: 15/02/2021 00:21:54 »

Catfish farming ignores such parameters.  With aerated water.  The fish are fed until sell weight.  Then put in O2 sat cold water, and trucked to fish packer plant.  Each truck fish tank takes one fish between two plates.....in a microwave.  And tasted.  If passed......they are bought and processed.

I spent 30 days in Augusta, automating seven 5 acre ponds.   All functions done at his computer desk now.  Saved him 3000 bucks a mo. on juice alone.   Eliminated all fish kills.  Was rewarded with a very high bonus.

He was a Mennonite, dairy farmer.  Sold his herd and built ponds.  Whole family took turns monitoring O2 thru every nite, trying to prevent fish kills.    Now they farm fish with automated sensors and control tech, and sleep at nite.  And have built more ponds.

13

Physiology & Medicine / Re: CT Scanner Operation

« on: 14/02/2021 00:48:39 »

I was scanned from my nipples down.  About 8 yrs ago.  I was stationary, the scanner moved.  UN-believable images.  Super detail.  I wish they would have done the whole body.  Too much metal in me now.

14

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Why is light bent whent it passes a massive body in the space?

« on: 14/02/2021 00:19:31 »

We bowed a flashlight beam thru sugar water, in 8th grade.  An example of the affects of a density gradient. 

15

That CAN'T be true! / Re: Final evidence of a rigged election in 2020?

« on: 12/02/2021 20:11:13 »

Politics is like science and journalism.  The participants start believing their own lies.

16

New Theories / Re: Was the light speed problem really solved by Einstein in 1905 ?

« on: 12/02/2021 01:25:55 »

From what I have read and studied, angular relativity and velocity relativity was discovered and described decades before Einstein.   Once from Ampere and confirmed by Weber.  Neither one needs local or space-time to explain it.  Relativity did not come from Einstein.

Take two frames with a constant relative velocity......Einstein was told that the velocity of light was a continuous stream and still measured constant between them.  And for that to be true, then either length or time had to be different in the frames.  So, he simply gave each frame it's own time.  This has been described as genius.  I think differently.

There are two problems with this.  First, they think that light is a continuous stream.  It isn't, it blinks.  And second, they keep measuring light in the same wrong way.  Light does not have frequency, it has duty cycle.

That duty cycle reveals relative velocity, just like the relative velocity of everything thing else.  And I am hoping that these new "quantum" detectors will show someone this......if they can recognize it.  It's another crack in the veil.

The "quantization" of light......is because of intermittence.  It blinks.  It strobes.   It has a duty cycle.

17

General Science / Re: What arethe top contenders for long term energy storage?

« on: 11/02/2021 12:04:09 »

I don't think so.  Anti-matter comes with every thunderstorm.  It's just inverted regular matter.  A large electrical potential, and accelerate the charge backwards.........gets anti-matter.  Probably turn out to be the cheapest fuel ever.

18

Physiology & Medicine / Re: How well would an adult do on a diet of human milk ?

« on: 11/02/2021 11:52:27 »

There are communities that have a diet of milk and blood that are and have existed for hundreds of years.  And there has never been a time......of less ethics.  This is the age of delusion.

19

General Science / Re: What arethe top contenders for long term energy storage?

« on: 11/02/2021 11:41:38 »

Why not solve all our problems at the same time.  The ultimate power supply.  Free fuel.  No waste products.  Instant on-off, no storage needed.

Matter-anti-matter.

20

New Theories / Re: Did the universe begin life inside a black hole? or MC Squared theory.

« on: 09/02/2021 21:38:34 »

My comments are not my theories.  The dynamics explained, are not my dynamics.   The concepts that I encourage you to read and study are not new, not unknown, and again, can explain the periodic table with an electron and a proton.  And that those two entities, are the only physical entities in existence.   Being that these entities are the ONLY entities, one had better be able to explain the table with them and them alone.

I use the zenith of the classical model.  Parson's Magneton.    Some big time science society there in Briton thought very highly about it.  It was the answer to reality, and many thought science was over.  But, of course, you were never taught that.  There is a lot, that you were never taught.

But it would be far more valuable to all of you, for you to understand that light is intermittent, and discreet, like a strobe.......not a wave.   And it is possible to measure it's relative velocity.