As I said, actions speak louder than words. How many civilian casualties are caused by British nuclear weapon?What counts as concrete evidence?A written political manifesto or military order may be considered evidence of intent. So far the only published evidence of genocidal intent is the manifesto of Hamas.
Successive British governments have funded the development and maintenance of strategic nuclear weapons whose deployment would cause millions of civilian casualties and the destruction of civil infrastructure. Is that genocidal intent, or the acceptance of inevitable collateral damage in the pursuit of a legitimate military objective?