Naked Science Forum

On the Lighter Side => That CAN'T be true! => Topic started by: Asians on 23/12/2017 23:35:50

Title: Re: Am I the target of Remote Neural Monitoring?
Post by: Asians on 23/12/2017 23:35:50
Here is all the info ive collected on the equipment and a ton of other sh1t that you can choose to believe or not but its all real
RemoteNeuralManipulation   .Weebly.com

Involves Parametric Speakers Voice to Skull Voice Synth and runs on radio waves which can carry electricity that the mind then converts firing neurons to cause the exact neuron firings the brain would undergo in any situation youre being forced to experience radio waves and the brain waves both are electromagnetic radiation even what you see through your eyes is processed by the brain as electrical impulses all of this equipment is referenced in buyable store equipment minus v2k which you can build via schematic and of course none has made an rf to brain transmitter device (the brain wouldnt need anything beyond nature to act as a reciever)

do note these are not neighbours i had the same opening scam that moved to street theater to cops to government to illuminati to aliens they will always have a new backstory that is bullshit and have given up minus sitting around being childish as possible telling my brain to feel anger at the dumbest sh1t even the torture attacks stop when they realise you are a silent unbreakable individual
Title: Re: Re: Am I the target of Remote Neural Monitoring?
Post by: chris on 24/12/2017 12:25:35
I don't think you are being monitored. I do think that there are scientists who would die to be able to read thoughts the way you are claiming they can; if they could, work like this - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/articles/interviews/anxious-brain and this https://www.thenakedscientists.com/articles/interviews/synchronising-brain-waves - would be a whole lot easier!
Title: Re: Am I the target of Remote Neural Monitoring?
Post by: aooooo000000 on 25/12/2017 01:10:29
i am abused all day. all about you? 
Title: Re: Am I the target of Remote Neural Monitoring?
Post by: smart on 25/12/2017 09:38:42
Quote
-If the brain processes it then it can be decoded with brain mapping and an AI (the brain obviously processes everything)

Unlike a computer, the human brain cannot encode and decode spontaneous holographic memories and require some time to consolidate fresh informations into its firmware (hippocampus). I really think the brain is a amazing thing, but I still don't believe it has the capacity to communicate and exchange information in the wild without a precise neurological function.

 
Title: Re: Re: Am I the target of Remote Neural Monitoring?
Post by: Tomassci on 14/04/2018 11:54:24
I think it's not real. But brain caps aren't in direct contact and they still work. And AI is not capable enough (yet) to read your troughts using just brainwaves.
Title: Re: Re: Am I the target of Remote Neural Monitoring?
Post by: smart on 14/04/2018 20:36:16
I think it's not real. But brain caps aren't in direct contact and they still work. And AI is not capable enough (yet) to read your troughts using just brainwaves.

I disagree. There's multiple ways to read/record and modify neuronal activity remotely. This technology and science doesn't require specifically that thoughts or consciousness could even notice how the brain may process psychocognitive informations.   

tk
Title: Re: Re: Am I the target of Remote Neural Monitoring?
Post by: Kryptid on 14/04/2018 21:18:42
There's multiple ways to read/record and modify neuronal activity remotely.

I'm still waiting for you to explain how such brain activity can be recorded remotely (sans implants or other devices on or near the brain or head).
Title: Re: Re: Am I the target of Remote Neural Monitoring?
Post by: smart on 14/04/2018 21:48:50
I'm still waiting for you to explain how such brain activity can be recorded remotely (sans implants or other devices on or near the brain or head).

No implants, electrodes, or sensors are required for modern ultrasonic/transcranial neuromonitoring of EEG signals in the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, striatum, and hippothalamus. The same concepts in ultrasonic neuromodulation also applies to remote neuromonitoring of neuronal activity in order to record/monitor evoked potentials in the brain with short ultrasonic signals greater than 20kHz.

tk
Title: Re: Re: Am I the target of Remote Neural Monitoring?
Post by: Kryptid on 14/04/2018 23:23:18
No implants, electrodes, or sensors are required for modern ultrasonic/transcranial neuromonitoring of EEG signals in the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, striatum, and hippothalamus.

I would like to see a link from a reputable source supporting this claim. In particular, I want a reputable source showing that a device capable of remotely monitoring brain activity exists and has definitively demonstrated its capability already. In other words, I don't want something that is purely theoretical.
Title: Re: Re: Am I the target of Remote Neural Monitoring?
Post by: Bored chemist on 15/04/2018 09:39:26
No implants, electrodes, or sensors are required for modern ultrasonic/transcranial neuromonitoring of EEG signals in the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, striatum, and hippothalamus. The same concepts in ultrasonic neuromodulation also applies to remote neuromonitoring of neuronal activity in order to record/monitor evoked potentials in the brain with short ultrasonic signals greater than 20kHz.

You keeps saying stuff like that.
People keep asking for evidence.
You keep failing to provide any.
Title: Re: Re: Am I the target of Remote Neural Monitoring?
Post by: smart on 15/04/2018 09:47:33

You keeps saying stuff like that.
People keep asking for evidence.
You keep failing to provide any.


There's a few good reasons why you're still on my ignore list.
One of them is simply because you lack the capacity to use the internet to retrieve posted evidences and references of peer-reviewed studies about this.

tk
Title: Re: Re: Am I the target of Remote Neural Monitoring?
Post by: Bored chemist on 15/04/2018 10:02:05

You keeps saying stuff like that.
People keep asking for evidence.
You keep failing to provide any.


There's a few good reasons why you're still on my ignore list.
One of them is simply because you lack the capacity to use the internet to retrieve posted evidences and references of peer-reviewed studies about this.

tk
The reason I can't use the net to read those references is simple.
You have not made any reference to them.
So, what are you waiting for?
Post the references.
Title: Re: Re: Am I the target of Remote Neural Monitoring?
Post by: smart on 15/04/2018 15:12:35
Post the references.

I have no reasons to duplicate data over this website. I expect readers of this thread to have the full capacity to retrieve the proper references over the web.

tk
Title: Re: Re: Am I the target of Remote Neural Monitoring?
Post by: Bored chemist on 15/04/2018 16:38:38
Do you understand the difference between posting the data and posting a link?

The reason I ask is that  I can't actually find any evidence supporting your suggestions and the comments from others suggest that they can't either.
So while it's possible that we are all thick, it's much more likely that you are talking nonsense again.

Your refusal to supply any references backing up your position certainly supports that idea.
Title: Re: Re: Am I the target of Remote Neural Monitoring?
Post by: Kryptid on 15/04/2018 17:28:31
Post the references.

I have no reasons to duplicate data over this website. I expect readers of this thread to have the full capacity to retrieve the proper references over the web.

tk

It's common etiquette for the person making the claim to support the claim with evidence. We shouldn't have to do your homework for you.
Title: Re: Am I the target of Remote Neural Monitoring?
Post by: fluxus on 09/03/2022 21:51:37
I think I figured it out, save yourself time and money  and use this instead, the side benefit is you will get more laughs than most comedians, until there is government honesty and transparency its the best you can do without seeming like a conspiracy theorist
Title: Re: Re: Am I the target of Remote Neural Monitoring?
Post by: alancalverd on 09/03/2022 23:10:45
There is no need for any government to invest in technology to read my mind. I've never made a secret of the knowledge that all politicians are scum and most are corrupt. 
Title: Re: Re: Am I the target of Remote Neural Monitoring?
Post by: Bored chemist on 10/03/2022 12:46:37
There is no need for any government to invest in technology to read my mind. I've never made a secret of the knowledge that all politicians are scum and most are corrupt. 
The politicians aren't keeping that a secret either.
Title: Re: Re: Am I the target of Remote Neural Monitoring?
Post by: evan_au on 12/03/2022 07:40:48
Quote from:
ultrasonic neuromodulation also applies to remote neuromonitoring of neuronal activity
Ultrasound propagates moderately well through soft tissues, but pretty poorly through air. That's why, when you go for an ultrasound, they smear jelly on the transmit/receive head so there is a continuous liquid path to you skin. If you haven't seen people smearing jelly on your head and wiping a probe over your skull, then they haven't been using ultrasound on your brain.

Ultrasound works by reflecting off changes in the stiffness of different tissues
- There is a very big change between your skin and skull, so you get a strong reflection there
- There is a very big change between your skull and the cerebrospinal fluid inside your skull, so you get a strong reflection there
- There is a bit of a change between the cerebrospinal fluid and your brain, so you get a weak reflection there
- There is no change between one nerve and the next nerve, so there is no reflection from individual nerves in your brain
- The chemical/electrical signals in your nerves do not cause a physical movement, so they cannot be detected by Doppler shift, either
- The very strong reflection from your skull makes it very hard to make out the weak ultrasound reflections from inside your skull.

Remote monitoring  of brain signals by ultrasound is not feasible.

By putting electrodes directly on the brain, and undergoing intensive training sessions, researchers have managed to interpret enough brain data to control an artificial limb for a paralyzed patient. Interpreting detailed brain signals picked up beyond the skull is beyond our current technology.