The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. The consequences of turning off Earths gravity field for a nano second??
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

The consequences of turning off Earths gravity field for a nano second??

  • 6 Replies
  • 2647 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Alan McDougall (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1285
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 15 times
    • View Profile
The consequences of turning off Earths gravity field for a nano second??
« on: 27/06/2016 16:26:58 »
What would be the consequences of turning off Earths gravity field for a nano second ?

A hypothetical thought experiment?

Alan
Logged
The Truth remains the Truth regardless of our beliefs or opinions the Truth is always the Truth even if we know it or do not know it (The Truth remains the Truth)
 



Offline PmbPhy

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3903
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 125 times
    • View Profile
Re: The consequences of turning off Earths gravity field for a nano second??
« Reply #1 on: 27/06/2016 17:34:33 »
Quote from: Alan McDougall
What would be the consequences of turning off Earths gravity field for a nano second?
The consequences would be what you'd probably expect, i.e. nothing of great interest. When gravity is turned off (which of course is impossible so you'd be violating the laws of physics) objects in the region of Earth would start to move in the same way that they'd move in the absence of gravity, but only for one nanosecond. That's not enough time to notice it happening. However for those instruments on Earth which are affected by such things and record them then there would be a record of it. Whether such instruments exist is another story but there are far too many labs and scientists working all over the Earth to know what each one is doing and what experiments they have running.
Logged
 

Online chiralSPO

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 3470
  • Activity:
    6.5%
  • Thanked: 446 times
    • View Profile
Re: The consequences of turning off Earths gravity field for a nano second??
« Reply #2 on: 27/06/2016 19:00:36 »
If instead of "turning Earth's gravity off" for a nanosecond, we imagined that everything accelerated away from the center of the Earth at 1 g for 1 nanosecond, this would be equivalent. Surface gravity on Earth is 9.8 m/s2, and the acceleration decreases at increasing depth. But let's imagine that everything accelerated away from the center at 9.8 m/s2 for one nanosecond, that would impart a velocity of 9.8x10–9 m/s and a total displacement of 4.9x10–18 meters, or about 1 billionth of the radius of a hydrogen atom...

As pmbphy says, "nothing of great interest"
Logged
 

Offline Alan McDougall (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1285
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 15 times
    • View Profile
Re: The consequences of turning off Earths gravity field for a nano second??
« Reply #3 on: 27/06/2016 19:49:22 »
Quote from: chiralSPO on 27/06/2016 19:00:36
If instead of "turning Earth's gravity off" for a nanosecond, we imagined that everything accelerated away from the center of the Earth at 1 g for 1 nanosecond, this would be equivalent. Surface gravity on Earth is 9.8 m/s2, and the acceleration decreases at increasing depth. But let's imagine that everything accelerated away from the center at 9.8 m/s2 for one nanosecond, that would impart a velocity of 9.8x10–9 m/s and a total displacement of 4.9x10–18 meters, or about 1 billionth of the radius of a hydrogen atom...

As pmbphy says, "nothing of great interest"

OK point noted and agreed with so lets increase the time of the gravity field being put off to a second?

Worldwide or complete death and destruction.  People/everything else will become unglued from the ground and reach heights over 32 feet in the second, and the living would die from the fall when the gravity turned on again. 

Also massive objects that became unglued would rise up 32 feet fall back and destroy every living thing on the planet, making an atomic bomb look like a puny fire cracker by comparison,   and then there is the inside of the planet from its core upward to the surface , that will emerge above the surface as molten heat to burn up what is left of our late great planet earth.   It would be a very bad second indeed , the end of humanity.

Also all the oceans of the earth will rise up 30 feet creating the ultimate tsunami

"I know! I know! that gravity could never be turned off in an isolated part of the universe, like the earth, if it were then gravity would not exist in the entire universe which would cease to exist alongside earth".

Nevertheless I think it is a fun question to debate!

Einstein imagined himself riding on a beam of light so why not imagine this equally impossible thing?

Alan
« Last Edit: 27/06/2016 20:28:51 by Alan McDougall »
Logged
The Truth remains the Truth regardless of our beliefs or opinions the Truth is always the Truth even if we know it or do not know it (The Truth remains the Truth)
 

Online chiralSPO

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 3470
  • Activity:
    6.5%
  • Thanked: 446 times
    • View Profile
Re: The consequences of turning off Earths gravity field for a nano second??
« Reply #4 on: 27/06/2016 20:11:07 »
That would probably ultimately cause some pretty severe earthquakes. I admit, I don't really see where you're going with this--Of all the impossible scenarios one could imagine, this is one of the least interesting (unless I'm missing something). I think it would be far more interesting if all of the oxygen in the atmosphere somehow became singlet oxygen (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singlet_oxygen) for 1 second. In addition to killing most non-marine life and destroying most flammable structures on the surface of the Earth, there would be some pretty nifty photophysics as the rest of the singlet oxygen reverted back to the triplet state...
Logged
 



Offline Colin2B

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 5381
  • Activity:
    34%
  • Thanked: 468 times
    • View Profile
Re: The consequences of turning off Earths gravity field for a nano second??
« Reply #5 on: 27/06/2016 21:03:46 »
Quote from: chiralSPO on 27/06/2016 20:11:07
I think it would be far more interesting if all of the oxygen in the atmosphere somehow became singlet oxygen
I hesitate to ask what circumstance might bring that about. However, I do agree, far more interesting.
Logged
and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
 

Online chiralSPO

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 3470
  • Activity:
    6.5%
  • Thanked: 446 times
    • View Profile
Re: The consequences of turning off Earths gravity field for a nano second??
« Reply #6 on: 27/06/2016 21:57:39 »
Quote from: Colin2B on 27/06/2016 21:03:46
Quote from: chiralSPO on 27/06/2016 20:11:07
I think it would be far more interesting if all of the oxygen in the atmosphere somehow became singlet oxygen
I hesitate to ask what circumstance might bring that about. However, I do agree, far more interesting.

I don't know how such a circumstance might come to be, but it is at least theoretically possible--there is enough energy from incoming sunlight, and there are several ways that light can be harnessed to convert triplet oxygen to singlet oxygen (in fact plants do this by accident during photosynthesis, and have evolved several ways to reduce this undesirable pathway and mitigate the damage done by singlet oxygen).

I cannot think of any way that gravity could be "turned off" so this singlet oxygen scenario is both more likely and more interesting than that described in the OP (no offense Alan)
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Is there a "force of gravity"?

Started by GeezerBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 51
Views: 27348
Last post 19/03/2020 20:01:02
by Bored chemist
How does the water in a water balloon behave in zero gravity?

Started by paul.frBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 7
Views: 9193
Last post 10/02/2020 22:18:15
by chiralSPO
Does anti-matter produce anti-gravity?

Started by kenhikageBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 12
Views: 9150
Last post 31/07/2017 20:40:35
by Kryptid
Why is it called dark matter instead of dark gravity?

Started by IAMREALITYBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 25
Views: 9045
Last post 19/05/2020 19:13:04
by Professor Mega-Mind
Did Einstein "kick the can" on gravity?

Started by OutcastBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 47
Views: 23345
Last post 27/03/2020 20:42:14
by yor_on
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.206 seconds with 50 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.