0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I think we should hear about the dimensional analysis you used in deriving your equation. And if you spout any nonsense I might be tempted to ban you permanently. How's that?
Quote from: The Spoon on 01/04/2019 09:56:31Deliberately avoiding the question please explain what each symbol represents and how it is relevant to the specific thing you claim it calculates. Also, explain why the following statement is true:'If you increase the magnitude of E³ you increase the volume ,the block expands'Explain using words not what you claim to be maths so that the concept can be assessed. u is internal energy and any volume of u absorbs energy and reradiates this energy . The absorbing of energy expressed *E³ because it's isotropic in nature , so if you have a ''cold'' metal block the ''hot'' is attracted to that block isotropic . The block will then try to retain an equilibrium and divide this gained energy by the surrounding volume of the block . Additionally the block itself expands because the whole of the block tries to divide itself by the surrounding space but the blocks binary bond helps to retain form by pulling back .
Deliberately avoiding the question please explain what each symbol represents and how it is relevant to the specific thing you claim it calculates. Also, explain why the following statement is true:'If you increase the magnitude of E³ you increase the volume ,the block expands'Explain using words not what you claim to be maths so that the concept can be assessed.
Quote from: Thebox on 01/04/2019 15:52:35Quote from: The Spoon on 01/04/2019 09:56:31Deliberately avoiding the question please explain what each symbol represents and how it is relevant to the specific thing you claim it calculates. Also, explain why the following statement is true:'If you increase the magnitude of E³ you increase the volume ,the block expands'Explain using words not what you claim to be maths so that the concept can be assessed. u is internal energy and any volume of u absorbs energy and reradiates this energy . The absorbing of energy expressed *E³ because it's isotropic in nature , so if you have a ''cold'' metal block the ''hot'' is attracted to that block isotropic . The block will then try to retain an equilibrium and divide this gained energy by the surrounding volume of the block . Additionally the block itself expands because the whole of the block tries to divide itself by the surrounding space but the blocks binary bond helps to retain form by pulling back . What do you think you mean by binary bond? Tell us how you derived this 'equation'. No flannel, none of your 'n-field' nonsense.
Quote from: The Spoon on 02/04/2019 09:26:17Quote from: Thebox on 01/04/2019 15:52:35Quote from: The Spoon on 01/04/2019 09:56:31Deliberately avoiding the question please explain what each symbol represents and how it is relevant to the specific thing you claim it calculates. Also, explain why the following statement is true:'If you increase the magnitude of E³ you increase the volume ,the block expands'Explain using words not what you claim to be maths so that the concept can be assessed. u is internal energy and any volume of u absorbs energy and reradiates this energy . The absorbing of energy expressed *E³ because it's isotropic in nature , so if you have a ''cold'' metal block the ''hot'' is attracted to that block isotropic . The block will then try to retain an equilibrium and divide this gained energy by the surrounding volume of the block . Additionally the block itself expands because the whole of the block tries to divide itself by the surrounding space but the blocks binary bond helps to retain form by pulling back . What do you think you mean by binary bond? Tell us how you derived this 'equation'. No flannel, none of your 'n-field' nonsense. (-e) + (+1E) = binary atomic bond I derived at the equation because I have my N-field theory :d But , in words , I can envision anything , I can ''see'' the process so I only needed the correct symbols to use in the correct order of event . The problem is , what you call flannel , is how I derived my equation and I have no idea why people struggle to understand a neutral field concept , not an electrical universe I might add, electricity is a product of manipulating the neutral atomic binary fields . = Neutral = U
Quote from: Thebox on 02/04/2019 09:35:32Quote from: The Spoon on 02/04/2019 09:26:17Quote from: Thebox on 01/04/2019 15:52:35Quote from: The Spoon on 01/04/2019 09:56:31Deliberately avoiding the question please explain what each symbol represents and how it is relevant to the specific thing you claim it calculates. Also, explain why the following statement is true:'If you increase the magnitude of E³ you increase the volume ,the block expands'Explain using words not what you claim to be maths so that the concept can be assessed. u is internal energy and any volume of u absorbs energy and reradiates this energy . The absorbing of energy expressed *E³ because it's isotropic in nature , so if you have a ''cold'' metal block the ''hot'' is attracted to that block isotropic . The block will then try to retain an equilibrium and divide this gained energy by the surrounding volume of the block . Additionally the block itself expands because the whole of the block tries to divide itself by the surrounding space but the blocks binary bond helps to retain form by pulling back . What do you think you mean by binary bond? Tell us how you derived this 'equation'. No flannel, none of your 'n-field' nonsense. (-e) + (+1E) = binary atomic bond I derived at the equation because I have my N-field theory :d But , in words , I can envision anything , I can ''see'' the process so I only needed the correct symbols to use in the correct order of event . The problem is , what you call flannel , is how I derived my equation and I have no idea why people struggle to understand a neutral field concept , not an electrical universe I might add, electricity is a product of manipulating the neutral atomic binary fields . = Neutral = U So more nonsense then.
I see that you have "u" standing in for "internal energy" and "E" standing in for just "energy". How do you distinguish between these two?
The density function of an object or gases compared to the density function of light propagating through the spatial ''vacuum'' . I personally just use ρ=1 for any atom where ρ is density . For an object it is different though because of compression of atoms . For the spatial vacuum I use ρ=0 although this can be increased to 1 by applying space-time curvature .
Quote from: Thebox on 02/04/2019 17:12:19The density function of an object or gases compared to the density function of light propagating through the spatial ''vacuum'' . I personally just use ρ=1 for any atom where ρ is density . For an object it is different though because of compression of atoms . For the spatial vacuum I use ρ=0 although this can be increased to 1 by applying space-time curvature . And what is a "density function"? I thought you were talking about energy, not density.
Quote from: Kryptid on 02/04/2019 14:26:32I see that you have "u" standing in for "internal energy" and "E" standing in for just "energy". How do you distinguish between these two?The density function of an object or gases compared to the density function of light propagating through the spatial ''vacuum'' . I personally just use ρ=1 for any atom where ρ is density . For an object it is different though because of compression of atoms . For the spatial vacuum I use ρ=0 although this can be increased to 1 by applying space-time curvature .
Quote from: Kryptid on 02/04/2019 17:16:04Quote from: Thebox on 02/04/2019 17:12:19The density function of an object or gases compared to the density function of light propagating through the spatial ''vacuum'' . I personally just use ρ=1 for any atom where ρ is density . For an object it is different though because of compression of atoms . For the spatial vacuum I use ρ=0 although this can be increased to 1 by applying space-time curvature . And what is a "density function"? I thought you were talking about energy, not density.U has a density function , any given point of space can contain more than one ''photon'' simultaneously .
Quote from: The Spoon on 02/04/2019 09:36:55Quote from: Thebox on 02/04/2019 09:35:32Quote from: The Spoon on 02/04/2019 09:26:17Quote from: Thebox on 01/04/2019 15:52:35Quote from: The Spoon on 01/04/2019 09:56:31Deliberately avoiding the question please explain what each symbol represents and how it is relevant to the specific thing you claim it calculates. Also, explain why the following statement is true:'If you increase the magnitude of E³ you increase the volume ,the block expands'Explain using words not what you claim to be maths so that the concept can be assessed. u is internal energy and any volume of u absorbs energy and reradiates this energy . The absorbing of energy expressed *E³ because it's isotropic in nature , so if you have a ''cold'' metal block the ''hot'' is attracted to that block isotropic . The block will then try to retain an equilibrium and divide this gained energy by the surrounding volume of the block . Additionally the block itself expands because the whole of the block tries to divide itself by the surrounding space but the blocks binary bond helps to retain form by pulling back . What do you think you mean by binary bond? Tell us how you derived this 'equation'. No flannel, none of your 'n-field' nonsense. (-e) + (+1E) = binary atomic bond I derived at the equation because I have my N-field theory :d But , in words , I can envision anything , I can ''see'' the process so I only needed the correct symbols to use in the correct order of event . The problem is , what you call flannel , is how I derived my equation and I have no idea why people struggle to understand a neutral field concept , not an electrical universe I might add, electricity is a product of manipulating the neutral atomic binary fields . = Neutral = U So more nonsense then.Huh ? Are you saying an electron plus a proton charge doesn't measure neutral ? 0 net charge . It's not nonsense .
Quote from: Thebox on 02/04/2019 17:21:20Quote from: Kryptid on 02/04/2019 17:16:04Quote from: Thebox on 02/04/2019 17:12:19The density function of an object or gases compared to the density function of light propagating through the spatial ''vacuum'' . I personally just use ρ=1 for any atom where ρ is density . For an object it is different though because of compression of atoms . For the spatial vacuum I use ρ=0 although this can be increased to 1 by applying space-time curvature . And what is a "density function"? I thought you were talking about energy, not density.U has a density function , any given point of space can contain more than one ''photon'' simultaneously . Where is your data to back this up?
Nope. I am saying your so called n-field is nonsense as has been discussed previously to the point of tedium pigeon.
Quote from: The Spoon on 02/04/2019 17:40:18Quote from: Thebox on 02/04/2019 17:21:20Quote from: Kryptid on 02/04/2019 17:16:04Quote from: Thebox on 02/04/2019 17:12:19The density function of an object or gases compared to the density function of light propagating through the spatial ''vacuum'' . I personally just use ρ=1 for any atom where ρ is density . For an object it is different though because of compression of atoms . For the spatial vacuum I use ρ=0 although this can be increased to 1 by applying space-time curvature . And what is a "density function"? I thought you were talking about energy, not density.U has a density function , any given point of space can contain more than one ''photon'' simultaneously . Where is your data to back this up?''Bosons obey Bose-Einstein statistics, and the Pauli Exclusion Principle does not apply to them. This means photons can have the same quantum state (same position, momentum, etc.)''
Quote from: The Spoon on 02/04/2019 17:42:48Nope. I am saying your so called n-field is nonsense as has been discussed previously to the point of tedium pigeon. Really ? Then space-time does not exist if you say that .
Quote from: Thebox on 02/04/2019 17:49:50Quote from: The Spoon on 02/04/2019 17:40:18Quote from: Thebox on 02/04/2019 17:21:20Quote from: Kryptid on 02/04/2019 17:16:04Quote from: Thebox on 02/04/2019 17:12:19The density function of an object or gases compared to the density function of light propagating through the spatial ''vacuum'' . I personally just use ρ=1 for any atom where ρ is density . For an object it is different though because of compression of atoms . For the spatial vacuum I use ρ=0 although this can be increased to 1 by applying space-time curvature . And what is a "density function"? I thought you were talking about energy, not density.U has a density function , any given point of space can contain more than one ''photon'' simultaneously . Where is your data to back this up?''Bosons obey Bose-Einstein statistics, and the Pauli Exclusion Principle does not apply to them. This means photons can have the same quantum state (same position, momentum, etc.)''And where does this show that any point of space can contain more than one photon simultaneously.?And answer Kryptid's question.
Quote from: Thebox on 02/04/2019 17:50:49Quote from: The Spoon on 02/04/2019 17:42:48Nope. I am saying your so called n-field is nonsense as has been discussed previously to the point of tedium pigeon. Really ? Then space-time does not exist if you say that . Nope. I am saying your idea is nonsense. It is sloppily thought out pratting about.
Quote from: The Spoon on 02/04/2019 17:58:41Quote from: Thebox on 02/04/2019 17:50:49Quote from: The Spoon on 02/04/2019 17:42:48Nope. I am saying your so called n-field is nonsense as has been discussed previously to the point of tedium pigeon. Really ? Then space-time does not exist if you say that . Nope. I am saying your idea is nonsense. It is sloppily thought out pratting about. Really ? Do you not realise the n-field is the interwoven fabric of time ?