1

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Can you freeze dielectric polarization?

« on: 22/06/2017 19:23:18 »

Ok the Idea is that you have a material which has a lot of free electrons moving around in its lattice.

the electrons are randomly moving around in the lattice unbound by any wells. the electron spins of these free electrons is random too... the Idea is to make the spin of the free electrons aligned as they move around in a material.

It deals with superconductors, I think if you can polarize the free electron spins you can get them to more easily pair up into cooper pairs.  Its hard to explain but It I think hydrogen sulfide superconductors have spin polarization going on via a locally polarized lattice which facilitates superconductivity.

2

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Can you freeze dielectric polarization?

« on: 22/06/2017 17:31:15 »

OK what I'm trying to say is rather simple.

Lets say you have water which is a polarized molecule, you place the water near a high voltage electric field to align all the water molecules along an axis then freeze the water and remove the high voltage field

will the ice retain the alignment that the electric field created?



see the picture on the right, will ice grown in an a high voltage electric field retain alignment after the electric field is removed?

I am trying to find a material (lattice) that can align free electron spin along an axis. so that all the free electron spins point in a certain direction.

I want a sea of electrons which have electron spin alignment.

3

Just Chat! / what are some occult technologies?

« on: 11/05/2017 13:00:01 »

I wonder how many technologies are hidden from public view or used in obscure and secret ways.

I mean how many technologies are out there that are being used in ways that boggle the mind, like UFO technologies for example or technologies that are used in weird ways such as aerosolized Oxytocin being used as an interrogation tool for use as a truth serum.

What do you guys know of... maybe you could come up with some technologies that could be used in a secret way.  For example about a year ago I made a short range radio takeover device  which operated on 10 major frequencies.  I used it to say things to people on the high way over FM and spread messages.  One time I used it to talk to a store clerk I sort of freaked him out (I told him he was trapped in something similar to the matrix) it was funny at the time.

In other words it was an anonymous use of technologies used in a secret way.

What can you come up with and what do you know of? it could be anything, a weapon or a tool or just something else.

4

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Where did the energy for the big bang come from?

« on: 10/05/2017 07:47:46 »

lets say I'm a photon, one of the first photons that the big bang generated.  I the photon would travel in one direction for countless centuries as there is nothing in my way to stop me.  I have traveled to this day 13.7 billion light years away from ground zero, on the edge of nothingness.  When the big bang occurred and sent me on my way another kind of wave traveled with me, gravity waves.   The gravity waves were generated as the singularity converted all of its mass into energy (at the same time I the photon was born)

I have traveled with the gravity waves on the edge of space the gravity waves act on me, curving me and eventually causing me to turn all the way around and return to ground zero a process that would take trillions of years but it would mean that the new singularity would be bombarded with photons like me, the first light of the last big bang.

So much light hitting the new singularity (which will form trillions of years in the future) would hit the singularity at a direct angle (straight at the nucleus of the singularity) which will rapidly heat the core of the singularity and cause it to rupture.

Also inflation could have just been what happens when the singularity releases it's grip on the fabric of space.  When the gravitational field of the singularity tried to snap back to it's original orientation.

5

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Where did the energy for the big bang come from?

« on: 09/05/2017 14:26:55 »

The singularity (assuming it existed) is were the energy for the big bang came from.  What sets the big bang off is complex.  I will try to explain that as best I can.

When the singularity collapsed and formed the big bang there was an explosion which was the result of the singularity converting all of it's mass into energy which caused an emission of photons. The process of converting the mass into energy is practically instant so there were photons emitted only for a spit second.  It sort of creates an EMP wave or a hollow shell/orb of photons moving away from the point of the singularity

in other words the first light of the big bang blooms out in an electromagnetic pulse of light and energy, This first light is still traveling to this day.

But the light will not just go on forever, it is still bound to the mass of the universe no matter how far away it is.  The mass of the universe will still bend the light if only slightly over billions of years until the light comes back around trillions of years later.  By that time the singularity would reform and the first light will be the last in the next big bang.

In other words the first light of the big bang will be used to trigger the next big bang far in the future.

I described this terribly, but I hope what I'm saying makes sense.

6

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: How fast can light be polarized?

« on: 07/05/2017 15:52:08 »

The magnetic field of the coil can turn the polarization of already polarized light in mid flight.

The speed (frequency) of switching will be limited by the characteristics of the coil. I would be surprised if a coil giving sufficient field will work at the frequency of the microwave signal.

just a "slight" turn in the field to at least be measurable It does not have to be like the picture 100%, the point is to make the effect work atleast a little bit, even if you rotated the polarization 0.005 degrees back and forth then you could still measure the magnetic field produced by the slight alternation of the wave's polarization

The effect that is trying to be archived is a strange bodiless ferromagnetic field that the photons will produce

its hard to describe why the beam would produce the magnetic field so I want you to look at A new attached picture.  The front view of the ape wave would have an imbalance in magnetic and electric oscillations AKA because of the wobble a magnetic field would form and an electric field as well because the polarization flips the wave before a full wave can occur and become neutrally charged. "A photon that is not neutral"


APE Front view.png (18.22 kB . 500x344 - viewed 6437 times)

7

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: How fast can light be polarized?

« on: 06/05/2017 15:33:03 »

The Concept of a faraday coil is seen in this video

The video explains a lot.  The magnetic field of the coil can turn the polarization of already polarized light in mid flight. the photon's magnetic field interacts with the coil's magnetic field and ends up twisting the photon's polarization orientation.

 

8

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Where does potential energy reside?

« on: 05/05/2017 20:57:20 »

Is time and space like volts and amps?  can one be transformed into another?  Curved space could represent transformed space-time.

Gravity = dense space-time  (if gravity did not curve space)

curved = transformed space-time

G waves = rippled space-time

9

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / How fast can light be polarized?

« on: 05/05/2017 14:18:24 »

I wanted to experiment with "alternating polarization" of electromagnetic radiation.  It is my belief that strange effects will occur if you can alternate the polarization of a microwave at the same frequency of the wave.

I mean to say that if you take a microwave who's frequency is X and you alternate the polarization of that wave at a rate of X you should twist the wave in a strange way that may give rise to unusual properties.    (see picture below)

I will use the attached picture to explain myself in a simple way

What you see in the picture below is a representation of my "APE" wave, an "Alternating Polarization Emission" wave.

in order to make such a wave you must use some sort of faraday effect device that can operate at Ghz frequencies but is that possible? can you alternate the polarization of a wave so that it looks like the picture below? Can a faraday effect coil operate at high frequencies like MHz and Ghz? How would you approach making such a wave?


APE wave.png (41.34 kB . 614x352 - viewed 7510 times)

10

General Science / can we build better spaceships?

« on: 23/04/2017 17:34:33 »

Rockets have always been what we humans have used to get into space BUT traditional rockets are rather expensive and wasteful. Personally I believe a new form of space craft needs to be imagined because what we have today simply wont take us to other stars practically and cheaply.

So I ask you if you can imagine radical new space propellants and technologies, as if you were trying to make a REAL star trek/wars worthy vessel. Just for fun.

I have come up with an unusual theoretical model maybe you could build on it or come up with something entirely different.

to begin I believe a very powerful propellant is needed, one that will be as light as possible yet pack the most thrust.  I have heard plasma rockets are the most fuel efficient types of rockets but non have been developed as a take off thruster.  I wonder if it's possible to make plasma thrusters powerful enough to be used as a means for take off.

Plasma rockets don't use a whole lot of fuel as compared to regular rockets however the do require a whole lot of electrical energy.  To get enough energy to the plasma rocket I imagine a network of high powered microwave transmitters "beaming" the energy directly to the ship wirelessly using "rectenna technology"

My kind of space craft would be a space plane that uses extremely powerful plasma rockets.

Because the ship does not need to carry a heavy power source the ship could be remarkably light weight and rectennas have been tested to handle huge currents, like over 100 kilo watts. which is needed to power the trusters

As the space plane goes around the earth many high powered transmitters track the ship until the ship can maintain low earth orbit, at which point the ship can gain speed like an ion craft to be able to break away from the earth to it's destination.

11

General Science / Re: Is artificial gravity a realistic prospect in future?

« on: 06/04/2017 20:00:54 »

It would make more sense to use high powered superconducting magnets and semi metallic suits to make artificial gravity on board ships, because you would need the magnetic field anyway to protect you from space radiation.

12

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Why can't light penetrate the event horizon?

« on: 05/04/2017 19:41:29 »

Your problem starts at the beginning, your equations speak of infinity, where the gravitational field of your black hole becomes infinite at the singularity.  Know that this is were your equations fall short.  the singularity at the core of the black hole is not infinitely dense it's more like the nuclei of each atom in a black hole touch, the gravitational pressure is so great that the electron cloud is bypassed, the result is something like a super atom which is as dense as anything can get.  Instead of assuming infinity try assuming an incredible atomic density.

13

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is the estimated age of the Universe absolute, or relative?

« on: 05/04/2017 19:06:25 »

Instead of looking at galaxies to determine the age of the cosmos I would look at gravity waves.  If the big bang generated gravity waves via the destruction of the singularity then it could be possible to calculate the scale of these waves.  If you could measure the wavelength and amplitude of the gravity waves then you could track them back through time, then you could determine the age of the universe and the amount of energy in the big bang by determining how much mass would be required to make such waves.

14

New Theories / Are gravitational waves the residuum of the Big Bang?

« on: 05/04/2017 07:22:53 »

                                        BIG BANG WAVES?
                               

Ok to start out I have been researching the big bang and gravity waves and I've come up with an unusual possibility concerning the nature of dark energy.  In other words I have come up with a theory which might prove what dark energy is.

Dark energy may actually be gravity waves coming off of the big bang explosion.  The reason why I believe this is so deals with the "singularity" which is supposed to be a single massive black hole from which all the mass and energy of the universe exploded out from to make the big bang.

The Idea is that 13.8 billion years ago "the singularity black hole" ruptured and collapsed giving birth to the big bang and the universe as we know it today.

So first there was a big black hole called "The singularity" then the black hole exploded into what we all know to as "The big bang"

The explosion converted all of the black hole's mass into energy in a single moment. But what most scientists overlook is what happened to the gravitational energy of the black hole when it converted its mass into energy?

The energy would disperse in the form of Gravitational waves.

This video should clarify what gravity waves are, my point is made at 7:45 in the video

What I mean to suggest is that the big bang must have created massive gravitational waves that would be the largest waves in the universe. 

Imagine all of the universe's mass in one spot, then it just disappears in a split second like the sun in the video link above. The result would be gravity waves BIG ONES with a wave length that would stretch countless light years and we may be in the middle of one of these giant space waves right now, coming from the peak of a wave down towards the bottom of a wave or in other words coming from a wave crest towards a wave trough.

                                   

At the crest of a gravity wave space is very dense and at the trough space is very stretched out,
if we look at far away galaxies we see that the light from those galaxies is stretched out and thus lower frequency.  I speak of the "red shift" which is merely light created in more condensed space and getting stretched out as it enters less condensed space.

So what I'm saying is that Dark energy is actually really big gravity waves that were made during the big bang and that the expansion of space is the just us passing over one gravity wave coming from the top of a gravity wave towards the bottom of a gravity wave.

I hope what I'm saying makes sense and that you can follow.

If dark energy is actually gravity waves then it would make sense that galaxies "breathe" as gravity waves pass over them, and interact with the galaxies which could mean that these space waves could be responsible for "Dark matter"  I think you get the idea.

I'm going to stop now before this gets too long but Please leave a comment below and I will get back to you.

15

Technology / How do you make a jedi mind trick device.

« on: 08/09/2016 09:58:13 »

                                                                                                             Ear controlled technology
                                                                                                   
                                                                                                         The image above depicts the inner ear the muscle depicted as figure 3 is the tensor tympani


Ok this is my question, I want to make a sensor that can detect a signal from the tensor tympani muscle but I don't know how to go about doing that, how do I make such a device?

The reason why I would want something so obscure and specifically strange is for good reason, here is why I want such a thing.
people have the ability to make a low vibration in their ears via contracting the tensor tympani muscle (figure 3), it sounds like that earthquake sound effect, or Jedi force sound effect. I and a good percentage of people have the ability to make this vibration in the ears at will. I would like to use this ear vibration effect to trigger something like to tell headphones to change the song or to push a radio relay button to switch something like a light-bulb on or off like a Jedi wizard.

if you close your eyes really hard you can get the tensor to start vibrating or clenching your jaw or when yawning its hard to explain to people who can't do it.

I would imagine if you put some sort of mic in the ear you might be able to get a signal but I have done nothing yet to try and build such a device Simply because I don't know yet how to go about doing that

the bottom line is that it would be cool to use this voluntary vibration effect for technological reasons but I need to get a signal from that muscle to do it, how can I get that signal?

I think a tiny microphone in the ear could work

Perhaps some sort EMG or something else entirely.

What do you guys think?

16

General Science / Re: Could cannabis use decrease risk of domestic violence?

« on: 29/07/2016 05:30:43 »

That depends on how strong the stuff is that your smoking and why.

It's strange the way marijuana addicts people.  Not to it but to the things you do while high.  If you smoke weed to release stress that your spouse was causing then it is associated in your mind to be needed to escape stress and when you have no weed you wont know how to cope with the stress your spouse is causing then bam! violence.

However if you use marijuana only after you get off work and listen to music while high, you'll relax but your mind has not associated use of marijuana with your spouse and no domestic violence would occur because of marijuana.


I find addiction fascinating only because there are many different types and levels of addictions.  it really deals with brain chemicals getting out of balance and causing too much of a substance to be in the brain, the brain gets used to a HIGH level of chemicals and thinks of it as normal, then when withdraw occurs your brain is wondering why a chemical level is lower then normal which causes emotional reactions.

Weed throws the cannabinoid receptors out of balance, cannabinoid receptors which are not a major mood altering receptor group like dopamine receptors is not capable of making you super strongly addicted to it or have super strong emotional reactions to it's withdraw.  It is possible that weed causes some tiny % of domestic violence however meth tobacco and especially alcohol cause far more violence and damage to civilization then marijuana could ever cause.

I would gladly like to see tobacco made illegal so that marijuana based products take it's place as a better less addictive choice for people.



Ps: the future of weed is bio ionic Tetra hydroponic chronic, the act of electrifying a hydroponically growing plant to a high ionic charge anywhere between 20 and 200 kv the high voltage electric field protects plants from pests and also causes many more hairs and crystals to grow on the plant, it also helps the plant grow faster and wider. The plant feels as though it is being pulled apart by the electric repulsion force It effects the normal growth patterns.  It also causes the water in the plant to become like a Di-electric and become aligned to electric field so will the cells within the plant which may facilitate cell division and absorption of nutrients.

The way it works is similar to the way scientists were able to grow ice crystals abnormally when freezing water which had a high voltage charge.

The end result is the strongest buds on planet earth, without refining to wax or oil.


You take a potted hydroponic plant system make sure it's not grounded and ionize the plant using a voltage multiplayer or van de graff then you want to take a tomato vine metal mesh and make a Faraday cage around the plant  and ground the cage, you want the plant to be close enough to the cage that an ionic wind flows but be careful that it's not too close that electric arcing happens, that would not be good.  These types of plants don't look normal when grown from sprouts in an electric field they grow "fluffy hairs" on the stem and leaves you would have to see it for your self.


the cage could be positively charged and not grounded wile the plant would be negative but that would mean you could get shocked. Its better to have the cage grounded even though it's less efficient it's safer.

17

General Science / Re: Have the constants in the Universe altered since the Big Bang?

« on: 28/07/2016 06:52:11 »

What sort of constant changes do you expect?  You mean to say that say the gravitational constant fluctuates, but how does it fluctuate, does it fluctuate in waves? It seems that is what your suggesting because you say that billions of years ago the universal constants fluctuate but are overall stable and return to previous constant values at other times in the universe's life.

18

General Science / Re: Is dark energy actually gravitational waves?

« on: 27/07/2016 14:29:43 »

jerrygg38

you get what I mean, excellent.

I wonder though how can I get this theory tested and hopefully proven.  It seems legit but I am unsure who do I take this Idea to anyhow? Do I just go to a collage and talk to a professor? Do I write NASA a letter?

I am also open to any questions.


But so far we covered quite alot to sum it up

Dark energy = gravitational waves which are millions of light years in wavelength.

Dark energy was created by the big bang because there was a mega black hole before the big bang and when the big bang happened the black hole discharged its gravitational energy into gravitational waves which still propagate to this day, we know these gravity waves as dark energy.

The fabric of space time appears to be expanding because we are headed down a gravitational wave's backside toward it's trough, the entire visible universe is riding down a giant gravity wave, in our time we are traveling from a wave crest down toward a wave trough which means we are on the decompression side of the wave.

Dark matter is the miscalculation of mass in the universe via the missing factor of massive gravity waves influencing galaxies spins.

The cluster of dark matter around galaxies is do to galaxies interacting with the gravity waves, causing a type of turbulence in the gravitational wave which is difficult to sum up but it sort of bends (a guess you could call them gravitons?) into galaxies because galaxies attract them and cluster around them.  Is sort of similar to the way galaxies cand bend light.

And that's the theory in a nutshell a guess.

what do you think, any objections or questions?

Please comment.

19

General Science / Re: Is dark energy actually gravitational waves?

« on: 22/07/2016 21:29:55 »

I have seen those pictures in the past, the ones which refer to dark matter clusters.  It appears to be blue blotches made in Photoshop.

Perhaps the mass of galaxies interacts with gravity waves and bends them like how waves of water bend around rocks in a river or stream or how gravity bends light. Gravity could be distorting the wave as it passes through galaxies.

Imagine a galaxy as a vortex pool and you have a wave of water pass over it. Some distortion will occur in the wave and may physically change the shape of the wave by having regions with slightly more or less gravitational wave energy in them. call it turbulence in the wave form caused by massive objects such as galaxies. This Turbulence makes the filaments which galaxies form in because it has slightly more gravitational wave induced space-time densities.

I mean to say that what's happening in those photos may be the result of a gravity to gravity interaction between the gravity of galaxies and the gravity of the waves as the waves pass through galaxies.

Just a thought.

Please comment

20

General Science / Re: Is dark energy actually gravitational waves?

« on: 22/07/2016 08:55:46 »

you say that only 4% of the mega black hole's energy came out in mass and photons, No doubt those numbers represent the estimated normal mass vs dark mass in the universe based on observations of dark matter and dark energy.

But I think that the gravitational waves which gave rise to dark energy and dark matter could not possibly contain 96% of the big bang's energy.

During the big bank all mass in the universe was converted into energy all at one time.  Each particle contains mass and in each particle's mass there is energy, a lot of energy but the strength of each particle's gravitational field is very weak in comparison.  The strength of the gravitational waves would have to be far less then the energy contained in the photonic explosion it self because the gravitational wave strength is dependent on the energy contained as mass in each particle.

Imagine if you took a particle, lets say a proton... This proton has mass and a tiny gravitational field, if I suddenly convert this proton into energy then energy will be released in the form of electromagnetic waves and also in tiny gravitational waves as well.  But the gravitational waves created by this process would be so small and weak that you could not measure them.  But you could measure the electromagnetic energy emitted by the process to be very large and powerful.  the same ratio of gravity waves and electromagnetic waves is emitted by the big bang as you are really just converting countless protons neurons and electrons into energy which would give you the same ratio of electromagnetic waves vs gravitational waves

There is no possible way that the gravitational waves created by the big bang contains more energy then the big bang it self, the gravity wave strength would be less then 1% of the entire big bangs energy combined not no dang 96% that answer was created because of the lack of explanation as to how galaxies were spinning so fast now that gravity waves are known to be responsible then the amount of mass in the universe is as much as it appears, no need for shadowy mass called dark matter.