The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Would the powerful magnets in a supercollider change the nature of the particles observed?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Would the powerful magnets in a supercollider change the nature of the particles observed?

  • 3 Replies
  • 4278 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Ken Silva

  • Guest
Would the powerful magnets in a supercollider change the nature of the particles observed?
« on: 11/04/2010 10:30:04 »
Ken Silva  asked the Naked Scientists:
   
Re: Super collider.

Is it possible that the action of all those powerful magnets used to force the particles into circular paths could change the nature of the particles so that any observations are erroneous?

Thank you.
Ken S.

What do you think?
« Last Edit: 11/04/2010 10:30:04 by _system »
Logged
 



Offline Soul Surfer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3389
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • keep banging the rocks together
    • View Profile
    • ian kimber's web workspace
  • Best Answer
  • Would the powerful magnets in a supercollider change the nature of the particles observed?
    « Reply #1 on: 11/04/2010 19:08:46 »
    No there is no reason to believe that the magnetic fields have any significant effect on the particles.  The magnetic fields are quite large compared with fields generated on the earth but they are not all that strong when you consider the fields generated around neutron stars and observations of them show no clearly anomalous behaviour.

    There is also no good theoretical reason why they should have any significant effect.
    Logged
    Learn, create, test and tell
    evolution rules in all things
    God says so!
     

    Offline Murchie85

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • 124
    • Activity:
      0%
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Would the powerful magnets in a supercollider change the nature of the particles observed?
    « Reply #2 on: 12/04/2010 10:29:15 »
    I have often thought of this question myself, say for example if it was to have an effect on the particles but at a deeper level (say quarks for example) then would it not be very hard to observe the inflicted change. As for a neutron star since it is so far away and it requires the state of the art detectors undergrouund in the worlds best facilities to detect the particles that are being emitted right here, then would it not stand to reason it would be far harder observing any changes in the neutron star as it is so far away?
    « Last Edit: 12/04/2010 10:37:18 by Murchie85 »
    Logged
     

    Offline JP

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 3346
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 3 times
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Would the powerful magnets in a supercollider change the nature of the particles observed?
    « Reply #3 on: 12/04/2010 10:50:29 »
    Even if the current theory is wrong (though there is no good reason to think it is) and the magnets do effect the particles, the experimental results wouldn't be erroneous.  The experiments would show results that don't agree with the theory.  Once the physicists involved had carefully checked everything to make sure there was no error in the experiment, they would then have to fix their theories to account for the new effect.  The point of doing the experiment in the first place is to test the current theories and also hopefully find new physics at work.
    Logged
     



    • Print
    Pages: [1]   Go Up
    « previous next »
    Tags:
     

    Similar topics (5)

    When the excitation frequency changes at the fixed end of a cantilever beam, will the natural frequency of the cantilever beam change?

    Started by thedocBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

    Replies: 2
    Views: 5634
    Last post 04/12/2016 00:08:18
    by Colin2B
    Would the magnetic field change if geographic north is not magnetic north?

    Started by Azwan Faez Board Geology, Palaeontology & Archaeology

    Replies: 1
    Views: 8494
    Last post 06/02/2011 23:30:37
    by CliffordK
    Will quantum security change online security?

    Started by thedocBoard Geek Speak

    Replies: 12
    Views: 10831
    Last post 07/11/2018 00:36:24
    by guest46746
    How can a change in a length of light affect the length of space?

    Started by guest39538Board Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

    Replies: 16
    Views: 10209
    Last post 02/04/2016 11:31:37
    by PmbNEP
    Can em waves that traverse solid materials, change to become em waves that get a

    Started by Nicholas LeeBoard Chemistry

    Replies: 1
    Views: 5003
    Last post 01/05/2016 12:04:20
    by puppypower
    There was an error while thanking
    Thanking...
    • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
      Privacy Policy
      SMFAds for Free Forums
    • Naked Science Forum ©

    Page created in 0.157 seconds with 43 queries.

    • Podcasts
    • Articles
    • Get Naked
    • About
    • Contact us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Policy
    • Subscribe to newsletter
    • We love feedback

    Follow us

    cambridge_logo_footer.png

    ©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.