Naked Science Forum

Non Life Sciences => Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology => Topic started by: imetheman on 09/08/2018 00:20:18

Title: Can the speed of light represent zero velocity?
Post by: imetheman on 09/08/2018 00:20:18
When a photon is produced and because we exist in a region of the cosmos which is travelling at a velocity of 186,000mps, [ 1Ps per 1 PL] the photon remains static at that new coordinate. It does not rush away from us at the speed of light, it is the observer who is travelling  at the SOL and it is they who are therefore rushing away from the static coordinate.
 
The relativity of any given atom/event/coordinate/singularity (A) is instantaneously broken at the precise moment that the Planck synchronicity of time and space of A is corrupted by the influence of a gravity pulse from an external source emitter (B).

Because we exist at a velocity of c [ie, the Planck constant], the gravitational pulse which is emitted by any given singularity expands out into the universal vacuum in incremental shells which are synchronous with the Planck constant [ie, 1 planck length per Planck second].  As such, the 3D space which is occupied by any given singularity is expanding at the speed of light. At any given moment in time, all of 3D space is expanding radially into the vacuum at the speed of light.

This suggests that physical reality exists in synchronicity with the expanding gravitational Planck shells which radiate out from any given singularity. This proposition that physical reality exists in shells, supports the holographic model of the universe.

Any given singularity cannot exist in a vacuum. This is because the time period following the creation of the singularity that it can exist at that specific coordinate, is infinitely indivisible.  The reason for this is that a gravity pulse expands into infinity.  The moment that a new singularity coordinate is created coincides instantaneously with the disruption of the synchronicity of the Planck constant from an external gravitational pulse source and the subsequent creation of a new singularity coordinate.   

This model proposes that 1 Planck length is a universal constant, but that Planck time is an infinitely indivisible variable. This is because time is based on velocity and the latter is itself an infinitely variable quantity.

Since it is impossible to transfer any information between any 2 points in space-time faster than the SOL [as dictated by the synchronicity of Planck time and space] , the shortest possible period of time that the first shell can potentially form around a singularity, is after 1 Planck second. [The 1st shell to form will therefore have a diameter of 2 Planck lengths].  As such, the moment of the  appearance of the singularity will always occur 1 Planck second before it appears in physical reality. The moment of the appearance of a singularity in space-time at a new coordinate, coincides with the same moment that the coordinate instantly becomes the past. This concept rules out the possibility of ever being able to travel back in time by any means.   

The resulting gravitational pulse which radiates out from the source does so in expanding consecutive shells in increments of 1 Planck length per 1 Planck second. However because the universal relativity which the coordinate possessed at it's previous position in 3D space prior to being moved no longer applies, it therefore expands into a relative universe of it's own making. This new universe forever exists in the past and cannot affect anything which happens in the present.     

As such the gravity pulse which is emitted by any given source can be regarded as expanding into the vacuum. The gravity pulse warps the timeless vacuum state which occurs at the nucleus of every atom and not the physical matter itself. The fact that matter forms in shells over time from the inside out, applies to all matter in the universe. It also accounts for the reason why matter possesses rest mass.

There is no inherent motive force which exists within an atom which will cause it to move independently on it's own within the surrounding 3D space in which it exists. Any observer of an atom which has been observed to move in 3D space,  will agree that the atom was moved through the application of an external force acting on it.  This law applies to every atom in the universe -and therefore by implication, the universe as a whole.

Every and all physical physical phenomena which occurs in the universe is explained if we assume that the natural rest state of the universe is a static vacuum and that physical reality exists by virtue of the fact that we are passing through the vacuum at the speed of light. The universal vacuum proposed here represents the ultimate definition of nothingness.

It is a fact that the Earth orbits the Sun at ???? and that the Sun orbits the centre of the galaxy at ?????. We also know that our galaxy is moving towards some unknown far distant mass known as the great attractor, at a velocity of ???? If we assume that the universe is infinite, it is then reasonable to further assume that the last velocity represents the spiral arm position of our galaxy relative to a massive black hole which our galaxy itself orbits.

If we assume that the orbital velocity of matter increases exponentially relative to the vacuum as the size of any given spiral increases in scale can be extrapolated to infinity, then it is reasonable to assume that the combined sum of orbital velocities of spirals within spirals [relative to the stasis of the vacuum] will eventually reach the speed of light].

When this velocity is achieved, 1 planck second of movement equals 1 Planck length of space - and time and space therefore exist in perfect symmetrical  synchronicity.  At the speed of light, a standing wave [represented by a perfect sphere having a diameter of 1 Planck length] is formed every 1 Planck second.  Whilst this velocity is maintained, the vacuum of the symmetry of the synchronicty of time and space remains uncorrupted and is maintained. 
 

For the time being, I wish to describe the moment that a photon is created and the physical mechanism which created it as being an 'event'.  The coordinate of the event represents a unique, one time only static point coordinate in space-time.
[To all intents and purposes, the point coordinate of the event represents a singularity].

A singularity is created at a new coordinate, whenever an atom of matter is moved in 3D space by an external 3rd force acting on it. The point coordinate of every singularity/event which is created represents the source of a gravitational pulse. The event horizon sphere of this pulse propagates out radially in 3 dimensions from the source at the speed of light. 

However, the singularity itself is static in time and space. Because we exist in a region of the universe which has a velocity [relative to the static vacuum of the universe] of 186,000mps, then 1 Planck second after the moment of the event, the coordinate of any external observer of the event exists at position in 3D space which is 186,000 miles distant from the static source.

The static point singularity instantly becomes the past, by virtue of the fact that matter is constantly moving through the vacuum of the universe. However the information that the event coordinate once existed is carried on the eternal gravitational pulse which radiates out into infinity.

The incremental nature of gravitational pulses, as measured by any given external observer explains why the measurement of physical reality is quantised.

Also, the fact that a gravitational pulse acts on the vacuum in which 3D space exists explains why gravity appears to be the weakest force. That notwithstanding however, this model proposes that gravity is a consequence of the perpetual motion of matter within the universe and that as such is the physical manifestation of the motive force of the consciousness of the living being which created our own observable universe.  The EM, strong and weak forces of nature can be explained by reference to the equations which describes the concept of gravity as outlined in this proposition. 
 
Title: Re: Can the speed of light represent zero velocity?
Post by: yor_on on 12/08/2018 09:44:08
Shouldn't this be placed in New theories?

And you need to clean up the text imetheman.
Not introduce Planck everywhere, although it is important.
Title: Re: Can the speed of light represent zero velocity?
Post by: imetheman on 12/08/2018 15:00:19
Shouldn't this be placed in New theories?

And you need to clean up the text imetheman.
Not introduce Planck everywhere, although it is important.
I don't know what you mean by 'Not introduce Planck everywhere...'
Title: Re: Can the speed of light represent zero velocity?
Post by: Bored chemist on 12/08/2018 15:53:16
Shouldn't this be placed in New theories?

And you need to clean up the text imetheman.
Not introduce Planck everywhere, although it is important.
I don't know what you mean by 'Not introduce Planck everywhere...'
You used the word 20 times in 1 post.
I'm not certain, but I don't think any of those was correct.
Title: Re: Can the speed of light represent zero velocity?
Post by: alancalverd on 12/08/2018 16:06:51
we exist in a region of the cosmos which is travelling at a velocity of 186,000mps,

Relative to what?
Title: Re: Can the speed of light represent zero velocity?
Post by: Kryptid on 12/08/2018 17:33:48
When a photon is produced and because we exist in a region of the cosmos which is travelling at a velocity of 186,000mps, [ 1Ps per 1 PL] the photon remains static at that new coordinate. It does not rush away from us at the speed of light, it is the observer who is travelling  at the SOL and it is they who are therefore rushing away from the static coordinate.

If all photons were stationary, they would not be moving relative to each other. Yet we can quite clearly send two beams of light in opposite directions, increasing the distance between photons in each beam over time. So what you say cannot be true.
Title: Re: Can the speed of light represent zero velocity?
Post by: imetheman on 12/08/2018 23:25:12
According to this proposed model, the arbitrary value of the velocity of the speed of light of 186,000mps, is a consequence of of the fact that we exist at a specific position within the spiral arm of a physical structure which exists in the universe as a whole. The specific velocity of 186,00mps  represents the sum of the cumulative combined total of the increasing orbital velocities of spirals contained within larger spirals. The value of 186,000mps is determined relative to the stasis/zero motion over time, of a complete vacuum.
Title: Re: Can the speed of light represent zero velocity?
Post by: imetheman on 12/08/2018 23:49:56
When a photon is produced and because we exist in a region of the cosmos which is travelling at a velocity of 186,000mps, [ 1Ps per 1 PL] the photon remains static at that new coordinate. It does not rush away from us at the speed of light, it is the observer who is travelling  at the SOL and it is they who are therefore rushing away from the static coordinate.

If all photons were stationary, they would not be moving relative to each other. Yet we can quite clearly send two beams of light in opposite directions, increasing the distance between photons in each beam over time. So what you say cannot be true.

I was being clumsy when I referred to it as the photon as remaining static in time and space. I meant the coordinate at which the photon is created remains static, not the photon itself.

When any given gravity pulse intersects with a coordinate which represents the nucleus of an atom of matter, the subsequent event which occurs is classified in the standard model as being a photon interacting with an electron.   
Title: Re: Can the speed of light represent zero velocity?
Post by: yor_on on 13/08/2018 01:34:00
Even though I'm slightly :) inebriated I see one thing, ok two then.
Clean it up
Place it in New Theories.
Title: Re: Can the speed of light represent zero velocity?
Post by: PmbPhy on 13/08/2018 09:44:24
When a photon is produced and because we exist in a region of the cosmos which is travelling at a velocity of 186,000mps, [ 1Ps per 1 PL] the photon remains static at that new coordinate.
Wrong. That statement contradicts theory and observation. You haven't even provided anything to back your claims up/

This thread does not belong in this forum,

Moderator: Please move it to the new theories forum.