[pzkpfw]

I think there should be a category of banning, not based on the poster breaking a rule, but because their delusions are such that they ought to be getting professional help of the kind a forum can't provide.

[paul cotter]

Good point. On the "sciencemadness" forum which deals with chemistry there was a category named "detritus" into which threads of no value were placed. This practice ceased a number of years ago, I don't know the reason.

[cpu68 (OP)]

The method I propose should bring specific results.

[Bored chemist]

The method I propose should bring specific results.

Yes, it should.
But it doesn't.

[cpu68 (OP)]

The process of intelligence development that can be achieved thanks to the described method can be related to the logistic model, which I used on a large scale in my other research (see New theory of evolution and Sociological theory). I will briefly sketch this model. Well, the graph of this model is a sigmoid curve, or more precisely, a logistic curve (generally a curve resembling the letter S). This model is associated with a rapid transition preceded by a stable period and ended with a stable period. This transition can also be described as a jump, from a lower level to a higher one. These changes are quantitative, but the period of dynamic transition is a cumulative quantitative value.
Well, my method provides tools to increase the level of intelligence, the stable period is the initial intelligence of a given person, the transition period is training in increasingly higher levels of intelligence, starting from, say, 180 points through 200, 300, 400, 500 to the final level, usually over 1000 points . The period of relatively rapid progression through intelligence levels can be treated as a jump phase, and reaching over 1,000 points as a new phase of stabilization at the highest level. It could be said that the goal of the development process understood in this way is to achieve an IQ value of over 1000 points. The final level will range from 1000, 1200 points to 1600, 1800, or 2000 or even more points depending on the initial intelligence level which may be 100, 120, 160, 180, 200 or more. The rule of thumb is that the final level should be ten times the starting level.

[cpu68 (OP)]

It is also conceivable to increase your IQ level by more than 10 times

[cpu68 (OP)]

You can raise your level to, say, 1400 points if you have an IQ of 140. But this number can of course be higher, if you feel brave enough it can be, for example, 2000 points.

[cpu68 (OP)]

Of course, the described method and the processes that accompany its use lead to the development of brain tissue, hence one can expect a constant increase in basic (initial) intelligence, by a certain value, perhaps not so huge, and in addition there appears a mobile ability to move to a very high level, let's say 1600 points.

[paul cotter]

With all that extra tissue your head would explode or your brain would herniate out of the skull. Either of these scenarios will be fatal with IQ=0.

[alancalverd]

My enlarged braincase is a congenital trait.

The resulting symptoms are usually treatable if diagnosed early enough, and with occasional revision surgery the patients can lead a fairly normal life. However delusions and incomprehension are not related symptoms. 

[Bored chemist]

It is also conceivable to increase your IQ level by more than 10 times

Conceivable.
But not possible.

[alancalverd]

Since IQ tests have been shown to be culturally biased, it might be feasible to raise the measured IQ of someone like cpu68, who is clearly unfamiliar with terrestrial mathematics and psychological terminology, from the apparent present level of about 10 to maybe 100 with careful nurturing.

[paul cotter]

Hmm, Alan, 100??. I think you are being optimistic here. Optimism is a laudable human trait but it has it's limits. Maybe ~80?

[Bored chemist]

I'm not saying he's dim, but if you squared his IQ it would be negative.

[paul cotter]

Excellent observation there, BC!