The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Member Map
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side
New Theories
Is the mass of an object a binary consequence and only really 1/2 mass?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Is the mass of an object a binary consequence and only really 1/2 mass?
2 Replies
1728 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
guest39538
Guest
Is the mass of an object a binary consequence and only really 1/2 mass?
«
on:
25/05/2018 03:36:18 »
M
0
= A + B
M
1
=M
0
+ M
0'
= 1/2
Demonstrated?
m.jpg
(57.35 kB . 1246x626 - viewed 1774 times)
Sorry , busy busy busy .
Logged
Marked as best answer by
on 19/04/2024 11:42:24
guest39538
Guest
Undo Best Answer
Re: Is the mass of an object a binary consequence and only really 1/2 mass?
«
Reply #1 on:
25/05/2018 12:36:18 »
Wasting my time?
Explaining away the neutron?
Explaining 1/2 mass?
Logged
Bored chemist
Naked Science Forum GOD!
30352
Activity:
13%
Thanked: 1217 times
Re: Is the mass of an object a binary consequence and only really 1/2 mass?
«
Reply #2 on:
26/05/2018 20:56:19 »
Quote from: Thebox on 25/05/2018 12:36:18
Wasting my time?
Yes.
There's really no point to any further discussion here.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...