0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Not credible ones.
Why high tides are formed in temperate zones, and not at the equator?
Coriolis force is minimal and in the temperate zones, it is maximal.
Quote from: Yusup Hizirov on 11/08/2018 19:59:17Why high tides are formed in temperate zones, and not at the equator?Here's a counter examplehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turama_Riverit only takes one counter example to show that you are wrong.https://www.co-ops.nos.noaa.gov/faq2.html#26
Your links are contradictory.
a number of stations closer to the equator have large tidal ranges.
Why are high tides formed in temperate zones, and not at the equator?
this is the Achilles heel of the lunar theory of tides.
Quote from: Yusup Hizirov on 29/08/2018 19:24:44Why are high tides formed in temperate zones, and not at the equator?Why do you think they should be highest at the equator?
Quote from: Yusup Hizirov on 29/08/2018 19:24:44this is the Achilles heel of the lunar theory of tides.Why?
When high tides are formed in temperate zones, and not at the equator, it is chaos.
According to the lunar theory of tides, the Earth's crust at the latitude of London, with a frequency of twice a day, rises and falls with an amplitude of about 20 cm, at the equator the swing of oscillations exceeds half a meter.
The highest tides on Earth are formed in the Fandi Bay in North America - 18 m, Ungava Bay Quebec 17, at the mouth of the Severn River in England - 16 m, in the Bay of Mont-Saint-Michel in France - 15 m, in the mouths of the Sea of Okhotsk, Penzhinskaya and Gizhiginskaya - 13 m , at the cape Nerpinsky in the Mezensky Bay - 11 m.The swirling theory of tides explains this inconsistency by the absence of whirlpools at the equator, as well as cyclones and anticyclones.
You say your "theory" solves all the problems.Please show us ho you would use it to calculate (as an example) the times of the next few high tides in London, New York or Barcelona or some other place where we can check.If you can't do that then your idea doesn't even solve the simplest problem.
The length of the tidal wave depends on the diameter of the whirlpool. And the height of the tidal wave depends on the rotation speed of the whirlpool of the orbital velocity of the Earth, and the time of the tilting of the whirlpool (12 hours).A = V1 • V2 / twhere: A is the amplitude of the tidal wave (precession angle).V1 - rotation speed of the whirlpool.V2 is the orbital velocity of the Earth.t - the time of tilting of the whirlpool (12 hours).
As is known, everything that rotates, including whirlpools, possess the property of a gyro (yule) to maintain the vertical position of the axis in space, regardless of the rotation of the Earth.If you look at the Earth from the Sun, the whirlpools, rotating together with the Earth, turn over twice a day, due to which the whirlpools precess (swing by 1-2 degrees) and reflect the tidal wave around the entire perimeter of the whirlpool.
I have sailed in the Severn estuary several times and have yet to encounter these whirlpools you seem to think are present.
Again, you are being selective with the data. If you look at a map of the world you will see that the equator passes through very few coastal places whereas the 2 temperate zones include a large number of coastal sites, so your two samples are not comparable.
Quote from: Colin2B on 30/08/2018 09:05:02Again, you are being selective with the data. If you look at a map of the world you will see that the equator passes through very few coastal places whereas the 2 temperate zones include a large number of coastal sites, so your two samples are not comparable.Take even wider.You have the advantage, you collect data at the equator, and I'm in the temperate zone.According to the lunar theory of tides, the earth's crust at the latitude of London rises and falls twice a day with an amplitude of about 20 cm. At the equator, the swing of oscillations exceeds half a meter (at the equator 2.5 times more).If to argue logically, at the equator the height of the tide should be 35-40 meters.
Quote from: Yusup Hizirov on 30/08/2018 13:19:56Quote from: Colin2B on 30/08/2018 09:05:02Again, you are being selective with the data. If you look at a map of the world you will see that the equator passes through very few coastal places whereas the 2 temperate zones include a large number of coastal sites, so your two samples are not comparable.Take even wider.You have the advantage, you collect data at the equator, and I'm in the temperate zone.According to the lunar theory of tides, the earth's crust at the latitude of London rises and falls twice a day with an amplitude of about 20 cm. At the equator, the swing of oscillations exceeds half a meter (2.5 times more).If to argue logically, at the equator the height of the tide should be 35-40 meters. If, the Bay of Fundy was on the equator, then the height of the tide was 45 meters.Have you evidence for that assertion?
Quote from: Colin2B on 30/08/2018 09:05:02Again, you are being selective with the data. If you look at a map of the world you will see that the equator passes through very few coastal places whereas the 2 temperate zones include a large number of coastal sites, so your two samples are not comparable.Take even wider.You have the advantage, you collect data at the equator, and I'm in the temperate zone.According to the lunar theory of tides, the earth's crust at the latitude of London rises and falls twice a day with an amplitude of about 20 cm. At the equator, the swing of oscillations exceeds half a meter (2.5 times more).If to argue logically, at the equator the height of the tide should be 35-40 meters. If, the Bay of Fundy was on the equator, then the height of the tide was 45 meters.