0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
It was a sungrazing comet of the type known as a Kreutz sungrazer.
Again, I'm not addressing that right now. I'm only focusing on my initial objections.
The above facts about a comet hitting the Sun clearly give an immediate understanding of the fallacy of the main official parameters of space such as: distances, sizes and velocities.
I suspect that this is due to the error of one important calculation coefficient - the gravitational constant.
how big should a comet be to provoke a huge explosion on the far side of the Sun?
How could MRO have lost 11.2-2.9 = 8.3 km/s of velocity during flight through space with zero resistance?
Quote from: AlexandrKushnirtshuk on Today at 00:45:22I suspect that this is due to the error of one important calculation coefficient - the gravitational constant.Please show where the error in the experiments that have measured it is.
I have already formulated a well-founded assumption
I do not have enough mathematical and physical knowledge to carry out accurate calculations
but I have already formulated a well-founded assumption above, about why the main official space parameters (distances, sizes and velocities) may be greatly exaggerated (oversized).
You're going to have to elaborate, because I don't understand what you think the significance of this is.
Last attempt
That isn't good evidence. Those pyramids also align with the stars in the belt of Orion.