1

**That CAN'T be true! / Re: I have a question too long to fit here, I apologize.**

« **on:**17/06/2022 02:59:10 »

Essentially my query wonders if we've been doing math (arabic numerals), binary, unicode, etc... to solar based math equations since around the time of ceasar... yes, several folks were involved... as it was harder to calculate the old ways... it was time consuming, and people had to be paid to do it (as of course we didn't have computers to do it for us). I just went back to the mesopotatmian eras and found the essential first ways we calculated math at all. Einstein's theory was debatedly lied about, as he had to do so (radical theory) to get out of a nazi asylum and to america (national geographic and history channel have both made a documentary on his escape). He was swiss also, and we know now that we calculate time itself via that swiss crystal and not the sun, as it is far more exact. But I found an element that can tell time, if you calculate math via lunar math (the only word I have for it, as it doesn't exist today)... it doesn't work if you use solar based math. But when I tried Einstein's math with that... I got what I think it the real answer... it only works if you use Vortex math a ways down tho. It indicates that he knew there *was* a speed faster than light. But, I know we had always wondered about some of his equations.

The indication is that... well, to me it doesn't make sense either, which is why I asked... because I began wondering about some of Tesla's equations... this involves string theory... when I tried string theory to Tesla's 9, and not ten, and used lunar math... well... I'm afraid to say without a consensus but time may really be relative to the location you stand. Like... it's almost as if space goes by a time of it's own... and... if I didn't know better... there may be different "types" of time.. um, crazy theory of course... but, essentially.. particles (like that swiss crystals' particles can measure time, so can the sun, so can the moon... but they are all different, when I measure them. Shouldn't they be the same?

I have peer reviewed source links... I saw in rules we shouldn't post links... but one is a entry on 'hyperfractastratified computational data synthesis' on the library of medicine at the national institute of health, and the other is the Canadian Mathematical Societies' information on 'Crux Mathematicorum' and it all involves what I call "true zero"... I've found vague references to a zero with a plus sign thru it... but we do have different zeros... absolute zero, etc... iirc, right now our absolute zero is set against Pi... I think... but... lunar math changes that a bit... of course, this also involves cos and sin, which is how I wandered into string theory at all...

Yes, of course, we should always follow process of elimination, and the Socratic method... I've been doing it for some time and hit a wall of sorts... felt I needed to ask... of course, not for medical advise lol - it was a metaphorical/facetious query... needless to say, if someone wants to try the calculations of math done way back... to the moon, as before they changed the calendar to measurements of the sun (and then to cyrstal)... I'd just feel a bit better is all... I've been trying to disprove this for quite some time now, actually... but all signs seem to point to me being correct.

The indication is that... well, to me it doesn't make sense either, which is why I asked... because I began wondering about some of Tesla's equations... this involves string theory... when I tried string theory to Tesla's 9, and not ten, and used lunar math... well... I'm afraid to say without a consensus but time may really be relative to the location you stand. Like... it's almost as if space goes by a time of it's own... and... if I didn't know better... there may be different "types" of time.. um, crazy theory of course... but, essentially.. particles (like that swiss crystals' particles can measure time, so can the sun, so can the moon... but they are all different, when I measure them. Shouldn't they be the same?

I have peer reviewed source links... I saw in rules we shouldn't post links... but one is a entry on 'hyperfractastratified computational data synthesis' on the library of medicine at the national institute of health, and the other is the Canadian Mathematical Societies' information on 'Crux Mathematicorum' and it all involves what I call "true zero"... I've found vague references to a zero with a plus sign thru it... but we do have different zeros... absolute zero, etc... iirc, right now our absolute zero is set against Pi... I think... but... lunar math changes that a bit... of course, this also involves cos and sin, which is how I wandered into string theory at all...

Yes, of course, we should always follow process of elimination, and the Socratic method... I've been doing it for some time and hit a wall of sorts... felt I needed to ask... of course, not for medical advise lol - it was a metaphorical/facetious query... needless to say, if someone wants to try the calculations of math done way back... to the moon, as before they changed the calendar to measurements of the sun (and then to cyrstal)... I'd just feel a bit better is all... I've been trying to disprove this for quite some time now, actually... but all signs seem to point to me being correct.