0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Yes, you could use that one.But instead, you invented one that makes no sense.
We can fit in the area a 2cm * 2cm square, but if we squash the square making it denser, we can put two 2cm*2cm squares in the same size area.
Quote from: Thebox on 02/03/2018 12:08:06We can fit in the area a 2cm * 2cm square, but if we squash the square making it denser, we can put two 2cm*2cm squares in the same size area. No, by squashing it you make it smaller. You dont make it denser. You therefore obviously dont understand density then. Amongst many other things.
Using a diamond in my example would not work for because it would be to dense to squash.
Quote from: Thebox on 04/03/2018 12:26:34Using a diamond in my example would not work for because it would be to dense to squash.The comprehensibility of diamond is about 0.2ppm per atmosphere.It's about the same as that of tungsten carbide.However, diamond is about a quarter of the density of tungsten carbide.You seem not to recognise that density is not a measure of compresssibility.This, in turn, shows that you do not understand density.Since you are relying on a misunderstanding of density when you talk about space, it is not surprising that you don't seem to understand space either.It really is time you stopped posting this rubbish and went and learned something.
Wow ! your ego inflates more than the universe. It is quite rude that you think you understand how I think about things. I already have answered what time is and what gravity is. A lot more than you ever do.
In fact all you seem to do is moan at people
Quote from: Thebox on 04/03/2018 14:52:53Wow ! your ego inflates more than the universe. It is quite rude that you think you understand how I think about things. I already have answered what time is and what gravity is. A lot more than you ever do. I have a massive ego.However it's not so big that it deludes me into thinking that " already have answered what time is and what gravity is."Quote from: Thebox on 04/03/2018 14:52:53 In fact all you seem to do is moan at people Only when they warrant it.I moan at you because you post dross on a science web site.Perhaps you would like to go back an rework your ideas now that you recognise the difference between density and compressibility.
No, I have answered time and gravity, I know I have because the answers I give are the end answer. There is no other answer after my conclusive answer. My answers are based on reality, science and objective facts, in short when I give my certainty, that is because the laws of the universe confirm my certainty. Challenge my time notions if you like or that neutral is attracted neutral is gravity. You will lose every time because I did not make reality .
You will lose every time because I did not make reality .