The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. General Science
  4. Is there an auditory equivalent of an optical illusion?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Is there an auditory equivalent of an optical illusion?

  • 6 Replies
  • 10539 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Rodolfo Hermans

  • Guest
Is there an auditory equivalent of an optical illusion?
« on: 26/07/2008 15:27:44 »
Rodolfo Hermans asked the Naked Scientists:

We know about optical illusions based on the way the brain works, and not on our senses.

Is there any notorious auditory illusion other than pareidolia?

Are the any logical illusions that work in a way similar to optical or auditory
illusions?

What do you think?
Logged
 



Offline RD

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9094
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 162 times
    • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Is there an auditory equivalent of an optical illusion?
    « Reply #1 on: 26/07/2008 18:31:48 »
    There is an auditory illusion of constantly rising pitch...

    Quote
    Sierpinski round (audio)   An example of ambient music using the Shepard tone illusion [rising version].
    http://www.uwec.edu/walkerjs/PicturesOfMusic/Audio/Pitch_Perception_examples/Shepard_tones.htm

    Logged
     

    Offline LeeE

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 3382
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 2 times
      • View Profile
      • Spatial
  • Best Answer
  • Is there an auditory equivalent of an optical illusion?
    « Reply #2 on: 26/07/2008 23:08:21 »
    I think a lie or an error might qualify as a logical illusion - this would be a statement that is presented as true but is in fact untrue.
    Logged
    ...And its claws are as big as cups, and for some reason it's got a tremendous fear of stamps! And Mrs Doyle was telling me it's got magnets on its tail, so if you're made out of metal it can attach itself to you! And instead of a mouth it's got four arses!
     

    Offline RD

    • Naked Science Forum GOD!
    • *******
    • 9094
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 162 times
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Is there an auditory equivalent of an optical illusion?
    « Reply #3 on: 27/07/2008 00:43:50 »
    Quote
    Diana Deutsch  conducts  research on perception and memory for sounds, particularly music. She has discovered a number of musical illusions and paradoxes, which include the octave illusion, the scale illusion, the glissando illusion, the tritone paradox, and the cambiata illusion , among others.
    http://deutsch.ucsd.edu/

    I must admit that I can't perceive most of these illusions, (I'm a bit Mutt and Jeff).
    Logged
     

    Offline RodolfoHermans

    • First timers
    • *
    • 1
    • Activity:
      0%
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Is there an auditory equivalent of an optical illusion?
    « Reply #4 on: 29/07/2008 03:15:16 »
    Quote from: LeeE on 26/07/2008 23:08:21
    I think a lie or an error might qualify as a logical illusion - this would be a statement that is presented as true but is in fact untrue.

    Yes, but in a good optical illusion you have the clear perception, even after being convinced that the reality is different, your brain may still gives the wrong idea. Also, an illusion doesn’t need to define the validity of a premise. In contrast, a lie by itself does not necessarily give the idea of being true; a false statement needs to be flawed either in the logic or in the validity of the premises.

    newbielink:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leaning_tower_illusion [nonactive]

    I don't understand enough about how an illusion works, but for example in the leaning towers illusion, the same information repeated two times gives generates the perception of a whole that is different from the parts. I may understand that I am been deceived, and may understand how, but I still see the illusion.

    Also an illusion is "clean" in the sense that it doesn't overwhelm with information, is not like looking to a maze, but may be more like placing the information in tricky way, like Bilbo Bolson saying; "I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve".

    My guess is that an informal logical fallacy ( newbielink:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Informal_fallacy [nonactive]) is what we could call a logical illusion, but I am not sure. Probably my question is then:

    Are logical fallacies equivalent to optical or acoustical illusions in the way the brain is deceived?

    Logged
     



    Offline techmind

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • 934
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 1 times
    • Un-obfuscated
      • View Profile
      • techmind.org
  • Best Answer
  • Is there an auditory equivalent of an optical illusion?
    « Reply #5 on: 04/08/2008 00:01:18 »
    Quote from: Rodolfo Hermans on 26/07/2008 15:27:44
    We know about optical illusions based on the way the brain works, and not on our senses.

    Is there any notorious auditory illusion other than pareidolia?

    Auditory illusions certainly exist - I have a nice collection of web links which I must dig out!

    One difference compared to optical illusions is that the human visual system fairly well separates the detection (the eye as a camera) from interpretation (in the brain). You can typically look "closer" or differently at an optical illusion to figure out what's going on.
    In contrast, the ear itself does quite a bit of analysis - it's much more difficult to "inspect" objectively what the sound is really doing.


    There's the Barber Pole (Shepard tone) illusion http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shepard_tone
    which gives the illusion of an ever-rising (or ever-falling) pitch - which is clearly illogical

    There are other audio illusions where you mess around with harmonic sequences and add/remove one of the harmonics and perceive things which you didn't until "conditioned"... I must find my links!

    If you can find some of these illusions then it can be useful to run a spectrum analysis program (eg from my web site http://www.techmind.org/audio/#specanaly ) so you can objectively watch what's really going on.


    It's not from my archive, but I just found this link which might be a start:
    http://listverse.com/miscellaneous/top-10-incredible-sound-illusions/


    Just found these (which I emailed myself in Nov 2007):
    I'm not sure which are illusions and which are about the workings of the ear. Something to get sidetracked on anyway...

    http://www.lifesci.sussex.ac.uk/home/Chris_Darwin/Perception/Lecture_Notes/Hearing3/hearing3.html

    http://www.parmly.luc.edu/parmly/clifton.html

    http://www.audiospeech.ubc.ca/haplab/Dimitrijevic_Stapells_precedence2006.pdf


    Also

    http://www.people.carleton.edu/~jlondon/Keynote%20Webdocument.htm


    http://hearing.psychol.cam.ac.uk/

    http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/jw/hearing.html

    http://tonometric.com/adaptivepitch/

    http://www.kyushu-id.ac.jp/~ynhome/ENG/Demo/illusions.html


    Grrr - I know I've visited more audio illusions sites - will append post/topic when I re-discover them...
    « Last Edit: 04/08/2008 00:33:46 by techmind »
    Logged
    "It has been said that the primary function of schools is to impart enough facts to make children stop asking questions. Some, with whom the schools do not succeed, become scientists." - Schmidt-Nielsen "Memoirs of a curious scientist"
     

    Offline RD

    • Naked Science Forum GOD!
    • *******
    • 9094
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 162 times
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Is there an auditory equivalent of an optical illusion?
    « Reply #6 on: 02/04/2009 16:48:17 »
    Found a good quality* free example of the (rising) Shepard tone auditory illusion …

     http://www.freesound.org/samplesViewSingle.php?id=65591

    Click on the play triangle on the top left corner of the waveform to hear the sound.

    It is 100 seconds in duration, but you'll probably want to switch it off before then.

    [* The wikipedia descending Shepard tone example linked to above has glitches every 20 sec] 
    « Last Edit: 02/04/2009 17:18:42 by RD »
    Logged
     



    • Print
    Pages: [1]   Go Up
    « previous next »
    Tags:
     

    Similar topics (5)

    "Another Hockey Stick Illusion"?

    Started by Pete RidleyBoard The Environment

    Replies: 78
    Views: 86848
    Last post 03/05/2011 01:58:36
    by yor_on
    How does this illusion make Einstein resemble Marilyn Monroe?

    Started by AllenGBoard General Science

    Replies: 3
    Views: 8077
    Last post 11/09/2010 13:18:09
    by lightarrow
    Depth illusion - Why do swimming pools appear shallower than they really are?

    Started by paul.frBoard General Science

    Replies: 2
    Views: 26305
    Last post 02/10/2007 12:19:38
    by lightarrow
    Why does nearly shutting my eyes create a vertical illusion?

    Started by VatsalBoard General Science

    Replies: 1
    Views: 3568
    Last post 24/04/2010 16:08:42
    by RD
    How do people see the 'hollow mask' illusion?

    Started by Andrew DK Board Physiology & Medicine

    Replies: 2
    Views: 4615
    Last post 03/05/2009 01:30:51
    by Xenos
    There was an error while thanking
    Thanking...
    • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
      Privacy Policy
      SMFAds for Free Forums
    • Naked Science Forum ©

    Page created in 0.108 seconds with 47 queries.

    • Podcasts
    • Articles
    • Get Naked
    • About
    • Contact us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Policy
    • Subscribe to newsletter
    • We love feedback

    Follow us

    cambridge_logo_footer.png

    ©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.