The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Is the universe older than we think?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Is the universe older than we think?

  • 1 Replies
  • 3112 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Fozzie (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 51
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Is the universe older than we think?
« on: 21/11/2011 00:30:03 »
Chris Martin  asked the Naked Scientists:
   
If the expansion of the universe is accelerating, then working back in time to the big bang, things would have been expanding more slowly, so it would have taken longer to get where we are now, so the universe must be older than the current estimations?

Love the show!

Thanks
Chris Martin

What do you think?
« Last Edit: 21/11/2011 00:30:03 by _system »
Logged
 



Offline Silver

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 13
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Is the universe older than we think?
« Reply #1 on: 22/11/2011 16:50:04 »
It was assumed that the oldest black holes would be around 1.4 billion years after the big bang but we have since found a two billion solar mass black hole (quasar) just 770 million years after the BB. The oldest galaxies so far are some 480 million years after the BB and better telescopes may find older ones. One of the oldest stars we know of from around the same time, HE 1523-0901 is in our own galaxy just 7,500 light years away.

We have to make assumptions of uniformity on dating the age of the universe. It's not impossible that the universe could be older.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

How do we know the Universe is expanding, and expanding into nothing?

Started by guest39538Board Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 43
Views: 24344
Last post 22/07/2020 05:10:15
by CPT ArkAngel
If the universe is expanding, what is it expanding into?

Started by Tornado220Board Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 14
Views: 8504
Last post 06/07/2017 10:35:51
by paulggriffiths
Where is the "edge" of the Universe?

Started by paul.frBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 25
Views: 24530
Last post 01/04/2020 06:01:21
by hamdani yusuf
If the Universe is expanding, does this mean that space is expanding?

Started by EthosBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 14
Views: 14812
Last post 27/03/2020 21:05:55
by yor_on
How do we "know" that the universe is expanding?

Started by PmbPhyBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 12
Views: 7374
Last post 10/01/2019 10:20:39
by Bored chemist
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.13 seconds with 37 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.