The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. That CAN'T be true!
  4. "NASA Confirms "Impossible" Propellant-free Microwave Thruster" - your thought?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

"NASA Confirms "Impossible" Propellant-free Microwave Thruster" - your thought?

  • 6 Replies
  • 11141 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline McKay (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 164
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
    • View Profile
"NASA Confirms "Impossible" Propellant-free Microwave Thruster" - your thought?
« on: 15/08/2014 00:08:08 »
I read in a few articles that popped up a few days ago in multiple news sites where it was said that NASA has confirmed a propellant-less thruster possibility. (this, for example: http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2014-07/31/nasa-validates-impossible-space-drive ) They think the microwaves resonating might interact with the so called virtual particles of vacuum to create thrust, to push against.
What do you think about this? Have they found a long sought for way to push against space itself? Might this be better explained with un-popular pilot waves being produced and pushed against without matter particles? Or you think this is complete bogus?
I even read in a similar article where it was mentioned (of course, I cant find the exact one as there are quite many of them popping up) that using superconducting materials and some extra fine-tuning they could create a ton of thrust using one kilowatt of power, which seems rather too good to be true.
Logged
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 17715
  • Activity:
    66%
  • Thanked: 1437 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: "NASA Confirms "Impossible" Propellant-free Microwave Thruster" - your thought?
« Reply #1 on: 15/08/2014 08:51:18 »
Nothing impossible here.

A rocket motor doesn't need anything to "push against". It works by conservation of momentum: if you throw stones or atoms out of the back of a spaceship, the spaceship moves forward so that the net change of momentum is zero.

Microwaves are electromagnetic energy - photons. The momentum of a photon of energy E is E/c where E is the energy of the photon and c is the velocity of light. So you generate lots of photons and squirt some out of the back of the ship, and the ship accelerates forward. There's no need for particularly large accelerating forces when exploring deep space: once you are in free fall, well clear of any convergent gravitational field, you can keep the engine running at low thrust continuously until the ship reaches a relativistic speed.

The reason for using microwaves rather than higher energy light photons is the efficiency of generating them from a purely electrical input, and the ease with which they can be focussed and directed. The nice thing about a resonant cavity is that it works best in a good hard vacuum - like space.
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline rami999

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 40
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: "NASA Confirms "Impossible" Propellant-free Microwave Thruster" - your thought?
« Reply #2 on: 24/07/2018 15:40:57 »
WOW NICE!
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 30169
  • Activity:
    21%
  • Thanked: 1172 times
    • View Profile
Re: "NASA Confirms "Impossible" Propellant-free Microwave Thruster" - your thought?
« Reply #3 on: 24/07/2018 15:59:43 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 15/08/2014 08:51:18
Nothing impossible here.
You didn't check how it "works", did you?
It's true that simply pointing a magnetron out of the back of the spaceship would provide thrust.
But that's not how the EM drive is said to work.
It bounces em radiation back and to inside a closed conducting container.
And that shouldn't produce any thrust.

I think it's fair to assume that, since we haven't heard much since this thread started 4 years ago, it probably isn't real.

Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Ophiolite

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 822
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 26 times
    • View Profile
Re: "NASA Confirms "Impossible" Propellant-free Microwave Thruster" - your thought?
« Reply #4 on: 25/07/2018 15:58:16 »
This 2018 paper raises doubts as to previously overlooked potential sources of error in prior experimental setups, but does not wholly refute the possibility.
Logged
Observe; collate; conjecture; analyse; hypothesise; test; validate; theorise. Repeat until complete.
 



Offline crystalbrincks

  • First timers
  • *
  • 2
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: "NASA Confirms "Impossible" Propellant-free Microwave Thruster" - your thought?
« Reply #5 on: 28/08/2018 16:58:06 »
This looks promising
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 30169
  • Activity:
    21%
  • Thanked: 1172 times
    • View Profile
Re: "NASA Confirms "Impossible" Propellant-free Microwave Thruster" - your thought?
« Reply #6 on: 29/08/2018 02:07:48 »
Quote from: crystalbrincks on 28/08/2018 16:58:06
This looks promising
No, it does not.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Is There A Best Place To Place Plaicey The Plaice In This Microwave Place ?

Started by neilepBoard General Science

Replies: 4
Views: 5757
Last post 24/03/2010 21:40:14
by RD
If exercise produces Free Radicals then why is exercise good ?

Started by neilepBoard Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 2
Views: 11104
Last post 11/06/2009 08:04:06
by Don_1
is the kinetic energy in the electric bell free energy?

Started by YahyaBoard Technology

Replies: 5
Views: 9219
Last post 09/08/2017 08:32:07
by meghayadav045
Need Support to troubleshoot any Yahoo issue. Dial the Toll-free Yahoo phone num

Started by edwardclark456Board General Science

Replies: 2
Views: 140974
Last post 04/02/2020 15:58:08
by chiralSPO
Is it water that is heated in a microwave or impurities in the water?

Started by Bryan Byrne Board Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 1
Views: 5037
Last post 16/02/2009 19:19:30
by JP
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.403 seconds with 49 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.