1

New Theories / Re: Origin of magnetic force

« on: Today at 16:04:18 »

The total effect of curvature is still the total mass or average mass of the particle. The dipole is a point like pulse of curvature. For negative particles, the convex curvature pulse subtracts from the overall curvature mass but not enough to make the mass less than zero.

That is just word salad.

For positive particles the concave curvature pulse adds a bit of gravitational curvature to the total mass of the particle.

Nope, charge has nothing to do with a gravitational field, charge has to do with the electric field.

Charged particles however create an attraction when a convex pulse meets a concave pulse from opposite directions because the result is a curvature that is intensified. A repulsion is created when like pulses interact because the result is the curvature is interference.

More word salad it seems.

Of course this is my theory, hence located here in the speculative board.

This is clearly not a theory, this what is referred to as a WAG.

2

General Science / Re: Are space and time just two sides of the same coin?

« on: Today at 13:14:46 »

I want to meet you at Joe's in 10 unicorns, of course we will have to set up a convention for one unicorn like the swing of a pendulum or the movement of the sun,

OK we are making progress you agree that time is needed.

however we won't need to set up a convention for the spatial dimensions because they actually exist and we can measure them directly.

This is just plain wrong.  Please tell me how you would describe a distance of 100 miles with out a 'convention for the spatial dimensions'.

3

New Theories / Re: Origin of magnetic force

« on: Today at 02:57:01 »

. A positive charge can be thought of a compression of space or a pulse of negative curvature. A negative charge can be thought of as a decompression of space or a pulse of positive curvature.

That can't be correct it seems.  If space was curving then all matter would be effected, but only charged particles are.

4

New Theories / Re: What is the real meaning of the most-distant-quasar/galaxy?

« on: Yesterday at 21:50:14 »

We already know that the spiral arm is all about a metastable stage of a globular cluster.

Nope.

The glubular cluster that is located at the outermost side of the arm is under the stronget forces due to its furthest location and therefore the thickness of the arm at the edge is just 400LY.

Most globular clusters are not located in arms of the galaxy.

5

Just Chat! / Re: Why the fuss about "neguinho" (nigger) common in English until 1960

« on: Yesterday at 18:37:44 »

Because it was a derogatory name for slaves in the USA.  I find the term extremely offensive and recalls the shame of the early history of my country.

6

New Theories / Re: What is the real meaning of the most-distant-quasar/galaxy?

« on: Yesterday at 16:12:00 »

All the stars there are bonded together by their mutual gravitational attraction and set the fixed shape of the Globular_cluster.
So, how can you claim that this fixed shape of Globular_cluster is just liqued.

Of course no one said it is liquid, just more bad faith arguments on your part.  The stars are moving in the globular cluster so the shape is not fixed.

Is it just to confuse the other side?

It seems hard to imagine you could be any more confused

7

New Theories / Re: How Many Numbers Exist?

« on: Yesterday at 16:06:08 »

To be clear,

Looks like another never ending, merry-go-round thread by Hamdani to put on ignore.  Bye and have fun.

8

General Science / Re: Are space and time just two sides of the same coin?

« on: Yesterday at 12:17:38 »

Nonsense, not observation.

I understand you for some reason don't like that time is a dimension, but what you like or want is irrelevant.  As far as I know if I set up a meeting with someone the meeting point would require 3 spatial and 1 temporal dimension.  As far as I know an event requires 3 spatial and 1 temporal dimensions to locate.  If you can do describe those exact points without time please demonstrate it, if not you will just have to accept that the universe doesn't care what you like.

9

General Science / Re: Are space and time just two sides of the same coin?

« on: Yesterday at 03:33:09 »

Is it not obvious that you can't observe the time dimension.

No more than it is obvious you can't observe the length dimension.
If there are no objects in space there is no way to see length or time.  If there is an object in space then you can see there are spatial dimensions, if there is movement you can see the time dimension.  The only way to see the length dimension is through physical objects in space.  The only way to see the time dimension is through physical objects moving. 

10

New Theories / Re: What is the real meaning of the most-distant-quasar/galaxy?

« on: 01/07/2022 19:16:42 »

Thanks for your honest answer.
So, based on the orbital velocity of the stars in the bar arm, you fully confirm that the stars there meets your calculation for solid arm.

Its ironic that you say thanks for the honesty and then immediately dishonesty imply that kriptid agreed with your silly conjecture.

However, I called the bar "solid" but you don't like that name.

Since that is wrong it is not surprising.

If the bar behave as a stable structure

It doesn't.

11

General Science / Re: Are space and time just two sides of the same coin?

« on: 01/07/2022 18:47:48 »

There is empirical evidence for movement, then there is personal speculation that movement is being facilitated by a time dimension.

That's rather absurd.  Facilitate is a rather odd word to use.  Isn't it obvious to you that without time there would be no movement?

Ignoring this lack of evidence and powering on with your personal speculation at least explains how you continue making the same mistake.

It isn't a mistake and I'm not speculating.  I simply agree that the mainstream physics position makes perfect sense.  Your disagreement with science amounts to little more than arm waving speculation that flies in the face of the evidence.

An event (location in space-time) already assumes there is a time dimension.

It also assumes there are spatial dimensions.

The co-ordinate system you mention is just math which again you are confusing with the reality.

Just like the speed of your car is 'just math', do you confuse that with reality?

12

General Science / Re: Are space and time just two sides of the same coin?

« on: 01/07/2022 14:06:41 »

Objects already know their location in the universe, if you are the object in question don't you know where and when you are? I think you are confusing math with reality again.

No, I'm not confusing anything.  To locate an event you need a coordinate system, that coordinate system must contain 4 dimensions, 3 spatial and 1 temporal.  It is rather cut and dried.

13

New Theories / Re: What is the real meaning of the most-distant-quasar/galaxy?

« on: 01/07/2022 13:56:19 »

Do you reconfirm that in a solid arm "the one that is twice as far out has to travel twice as far to complete one orbit."
Yes or No, please?
Do you confirm the Bar arm meets your calculation for solid arm?
So, as the Bar arm looks solid, Behave solid & meets you calculation for solid arm by 100%  - then why do you claim that it can't be solid?
Are you sure that only astrophysicist can approve this observation?

It is difficult to have a science related discussion with someone who does not even know what a solid is.

Hence, if that astrophysicist would tell you that the Bar arm is solid as it fully meets the calculation for solid arm - would you believe him?

Of course not.

14

General Science / Re: Are space and time just two sides of the same coin?

« on: 01/07/2022 00:15:30 »

Remembering and predicting movement is strong evidence of a time dimension how exactly?

The only way to predict the objects position would be to use all 4 dimensions.  If you only used the 3 spacial dimensions you obviously couldn't predict the location. 

15

General Science / Re: Are space and time just two sides of the same coin?

« on: 30/06/2022 20:42:51 »

I remember where objects were before they moved (past), and I can predict where objects will be after they move (future) but memory and prediction of movement is far from being evidence of a time dimension.

That's kind of ironic, since that statement seems to be strong evidence that time is a dimension.

16

New Theories / Re: Molecular chain that would end all life? Causality Firewall of life/ CFL?

« on: 30/06/2022 19:59:38 »

Word salad?

Well, let's put it this way, I recommend ranch dressing with that post.

17

New Theories / Re: What is the real meaning of the most-distant-quasar/galaxy?

« on: 29/06/2022 20:59:41 »

So please, what kind of force could hold the spiral arm or the bar for millions and billions of years?

For maybe the 20th time in this thread, gravity.

18

Geology, Palaeontology & Archaeology / Re: What animal made this footprint?

« on: 29/06/2022 15:22:44 »

It looks like it could be a foot print, but it could easily be an erosion effect, so a lot more data is needed.  Where was the rock found?  What kind of stone is it?  What was the age of the strata it was found?

19

Geology, Palaeontology & Archaeology / Re: What animal made this footprint?

« on: 28/06/2022 22:53:43 »

What makes you think it's a foot print?

20

New Theories / Re: Origin of magnetic force

« on: 28/06/2022 19:32:43 »

The magnoflux spin effect is documented on my blogs and videos.

Do you have any independent scientific sources (not your site, not youtube, etc.) for magnoflux spin effect.