The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Profile of trevorjohnson32
  3. Show Posts
  4. Thanked Posts
  • Profile Info
    • Summary
    • Show Stats
    • Show Posts
      • Messages
      • Topics
      • Attachments
      • Thanked Posts
      • Posts Thanked By User
    • Show User Topics
      • User Created
      • User Participated In

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

  • Messages
  • Topics
  • Attachments
  • Thanked Posts
  • Posts Thanked By User

Messages - trevorjohnson32

Pages: [1]
1
New Theories / Re: Who came up with gravity example?
« on: 21/02/2021 19:33:49 »
Quote from: puppypower on 21/02/2021 13:41:09
For example, this metaphor at some level assumes the fabric, that is space, is somehow anchored at its perimeter and suspended in the middle like a trampoline. Why is the fabric not lying flat on a table? If space was a fabric laying flat on a table, this gravity metaphor would not work. Or, if it was not anchored at the perimeter, but only suspended, the two masses would both fall, without attraction.  Attachment or not makes or breaks it.

Another flaw in the analogy comparison to the trampoline is that the trampoline only works because of the gravity below it. Because of this the only correct view of the trampoline is the top view. Saying that there is 'bending' that occurs to space is looking at the side view of the trampoline which is null as an analogy of 3D space or 2D. If the trampoline were just floating in space the experiment wouldn't work at all.
The following users thanked this post: charles1948

2
New Theories / Re: What causes the human tailbone to wag/Dizzyness?
« on: 15/12/2018 18:28:03 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 15/12/2018 05:49:42
Quote from: trevorjohnson32 on 14/12/2018 21:09:06
No, there are many crazy tricks that can be done once your profficient at the tail wag.

Such as?

reading people's gestures and controlling there behaviour through gestures of your own is kind of fun. You can see another persons tail wag while standing in public, its a very subtle gesture but one can see it even in there peripheral vision.
The following users thanked this post: Bored chemist

3
New Theories / Re: On Einstein’s ‘Light Clock' thought experiment.
« on: 05/06/2017 16:54:25 »
Quote from: RTCPhysics on 25/05/2017 11:10:30
It is here that an assumption is made in the lightclock ‘thought experiment’, which leads to the concept of time slowing down. The assumption is that ‘the photon will continue to be reflected between the central points of two parallel mirrors of the light box, regardless of the movement of the glass box.’ But this is not how the laws of ‘photon physics’ work.

Within the moving box, the photon spends most of its time travelling between the two mirrors and as such is unaffected by the movement of the evacuated glass box. In addition, when the photon is reflected perpendicularly off the moving mirrored surface, its speed is unchanged. If it gained or lost kinetic energy during its reflection off the mirrored surface, then this would result in an increase or decrease in its kinetic energy leading to a change in the magnitude of the photon’s speed, which we know is not the case. It is not possible to accelerate or decelerate a photon.



A photon between two parallel mirrors will disappear once the source of the light is gone. Photons are silly. light is a squeezing on the same energy grid of space time that magnetism acts on. once the squeezing effect of the flashlight or whatever the light source is is taken away it no longer exists in the mirror.
The following users thanked this post: Alex Dullius Siqueira

4
New Theories / Re: If there was one Big Bang event, why not multiple big bangs?
« on: 11/05/2017 17:02:49 »
I think the big bang was just for our universe and that including other universe's in the picture would make multiple big bangs. maybe at the wall of the universe if you stuck your hand out all the weight of the matter in your hand would expand because of the super less dense quality of space-time in an outside universe. Then the matter of your hand would become blocks of space.
The following users thanked this post: Alex Dullius Siqueira

5
New Theories / Theory on Space-time
« on: 18/06/2016 18:52:58 »
Theoretical Physics
By Trevor Borocz Johnson

A universe and a quark are composed of the same substance that is Space-time and have the same properties, properties like fusion in stars, the periodic table, the chemistry for life, nature etc.. Space, which I refer to as void, and time which I refer to as energy, are woven together to form a universe or a quark. A universe or quark is then composed of cubic void blocks and energy lining those void blocks in a cubic honeycomb symmetry. A universe or quark is shaped like a cube.

A Quark is a super dense, super small, area of space-time. An area of denser space-time will put a transcendent squeezing or density in the surrounding space-time it exists in. Void blocks surrounding the quark are squeezed smaller by the super dense dimension of the quark. A body such as a planet creates a field of these denser void blocks because of the combined gravity field of the astronomical number of quarks in the planet. A quark passing by will “fall” into this field as it is attracted to the region of denser void which only increases the closer you are to the planet.

Just like the super dense space-time of the quark puts a transcendent squeezing effect on the surrounding space-time its in, so too does the planet's gravity field have this effect on the edge of the quarks gravity field. When the edge of the gravity field of the quark touches the gravity field of the planet, the part of the outer layer touching the planet's gravity field becomes as dense as the outer layer of the planet's gravity field. The space time of the quarks gravity field that is squeezed becomes smaller in size, the quark and its gravity field then experience momentum in the direction of the squeezing, each successive layer of the planet's gravity field pulling it in faster. The denser space which increases the closer to the planet, has the more powerful attraction force and the quark is pulled in that direction giving it momentum energy. The quark and the planet both pull on each other and effect one another in ratio to their size.

If a body with a gravity field loses weight or during an object’s momentum on the surface of said body The field in its entirety decreases, and the units of empty space void expand slightly in a wave that perpetuates outward from the object. This is what creates gravity waves.

The number of quarks in a human body is 1.345 x 10^29. The area in which all the quarks of the earth would occupy if only quarks were to fill a region is a sphere with a diameter of .7 inches. That puts the weight of the earth into a teaspoon. In comparison to the size of the gravity field they create from there desolate existence it is clear that a quark has a much greater role in the universe then that of its physical boundaries. The limits of the gravitational boundaries of a single quark is of an inch to a sphere with a radius of up to four million miles. It is at this boundary to a single quark that its influence on space-time seizes and it can go back to its regular state. That is for a single quark. For the nucleus of a hydrogen atom which contains six quarks, three in its neutron and three in its proton, the region of boundary where the influence of gravity and compressed space-time returns to its regular state may ‘wobble’ between several different boundaries in accordance with the combination of quark spins. These different boundaries are what make up the different electron shells that an atom can have. From here at these boundaries, the atom’s retain the electron’s that compose their essence.  An electron then is simply a slice of energy whose amount is calculated by the edge of the region of space that is affected by an atom’s gravity.

The strong form of energy is electromagnetic radiation(EMR) and electrons, and its inactive form is a weak energy dimension, the time of space-time. This weaker energy dimension is like a grid and has the property of flowing. The weaker energy dimension of empty space is a lining between the blocks of empty space void. It would resemble something like the lines on a sheet of graph paper where the white blocks on the sheet are the units of empty space void.

Electromagnetic radiation is a stress on this weaker dimensional energy of empty space. The stress gives energy and electrons ‘weight’ by squeezing on the dimensional void of space-time its in creating the effect of gravity. The squeezing stress itself is invisible which can be observed by holding a flashlight or LED behind one’s head and pointing it in the direction of sight in the dark. Anything within the region of squeezing will become illuminated but space itself will remain dark. In a sunlit room each illuminated object will add its own hue of coloration to the overall tension in the room which can be observed by holding a white sheet of paper in the center of the room. The sheet of paper will reflect the mixture of colorations that are present in the tension of empty space and changes as you move it around.

Magnetism is a property of the flowing of the empty space energy dimension. In a ferromagnetic material all the electrons orbit in the same direction. This creates a fan like churning of the empty space energy dimension. A magnetic field is then stirred up like wind through fan blades where one side of the material, south, is the draw for the fan, and the other side of the material, north, is the region that the ‘air’ would fill. Thusly two north ends repel each other and so do two southern ends. When you move the magnet around you change the region of empty space which it has an effect on.
The following users thanked this post: GoC, quasimodo

6
New Theories / Re: Working Model Of The Universe, Dimensions, Gravity, And Energy
« on: 30/12/2015 02:23:24 »
Quote from: Space Flow on 28/12/2015 21:26:02
One question straight of the bat; How is this void density created by the dimension jumping Quarks translate to the Gravity we feel in the relativistic macro world?
well the theory I'm proposing includes the idea that a universe and a quark are the same object, One is a nth dimension in infinity, and the other is one dimension above or below the nth dimension depending on how you want to put it. So a quark leaving the universe becomes gravity fuel for the universe that our universe is a quark inside, a universe I sometimes call the 4th dimension.
Also I read your paper. That's really cool man I've been writing backwooods science since I was a kid in Astronomy, Its funny to me to meet someone else who does the same thing. I like where you talk about how the 'shockwaves' or energy is limited by the space it's traveling in I can see how that's similar to my hypotheses.
The following users thanked this post: Space Flow

Pages: [1]
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 5.116 seconds with 33 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.