The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Member Map
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side
New Theories
Zero Particle Theory
« previous
next »
Print
Pages:
1
...
5
6
[
7
]
8
Go Down
Zero Particle Theory
148 Replies
55168 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pincho
(OP)
Sr. Member
268
Activity:
0%
Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
Re: Zero Particle Theory
«
Reply #120 on:
07/04/2013 18:32:00 »
More news about pairing Electrons with Positrons...
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn21593-have-we-summoned-the-mysterious-majorana-fermion.html
Logged
It's your fault if you don't understand me.
Pincho
(OP)
Sr. Member
268
Activity:
0%
Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
Re: Zero Particle Theory
«
Reply #121 on:
08/04/2013 09:04:40 »
Life, and Intelligence emanating from the Earth...
Is it possible that life comes from the centre of the Earth as an outflow? I have been studying gravity, and its outflow, and there is an Inverse square law in both directions. Everyone knows the inverse square law of Gravity, but this inverse square law is more interesting.
Every action has an equal and opposite reaction, so the inverse square law has an equal, and opposite reaction on the Earth. Now Gravity is cancelled out by spin, and flow, and so it is hard to actually measure mass 100% accurately. If the Earth contained a flow force similar to a singularity, it would be cancelled out by an inverse outflow. This outflow would be able to create life by creating particles through the Earth from pressure.
Well, I found a relationship to this information. It is in the skin of animals, and life...
The Outflow of life
The Inverse square law is visible in the skin combined with the mass, and combined with the contact with the Earth of points, and distance from the Earth. So for example...
1/ You have the low end of the scale. The bird which is lightweight, with feathers flowing out in every direction. It's outflow is high compared with its body weight. Two spindly legs, and spends a lot of time a long distance away from the Earth. Call this the light scale.
2/ Low to medium weight you have the cat, and the dog. The cat with 4 legs in contact with the Earth, covered in fur, and outflow relating to the 4 points in contact with the Earth. So fur on the back where fur is on our head is a relationship to outflow in the same direction. Spends most of the time up to about 2ft away from the Earth.
3/ You have a human, about 10 stone, two legs touching the Earth, 1ft square contact. This human has smooth skin, some hair at the top, and some genital hair. The smooth skin, and the hair are the outflow forces. 6ft away from the Earth. This is the exact middle scale, which you can call the Neutral scale. I think that this neutral scale is important to intelligence.
4/ Getting bigger, the cow. 4 legs in contact with the Earth. The nails are starting to become hooves, the fur is getting shorter from the cat, and the dog. Th skin is still smooth. 5ft away from the Earth.
5/ The elephant. 4 legs in contact with the Earth. The nails are thick. The feet are flat. The fur is dwindling away. The skin is starting to become wrinkled. The wrinkles are related to the outflow changing back to an inflow, like a snowflake, and a Bose/ Einstein Condensate. 8ft away from the Earth.
6/ The tree. Multiple contacts with the Earth as roots. The feet embed into the ground. The fur has become leaves, and the skin is extremely wrinkled. A powerful inflow, and outflow combined. The tree has taken on its own life giving properties like the Earth. It's height is divided into roots flows, hard to measure per root.
I believe that this is the inverted Inverse Square Law as Newton's 3rd law that every action has an equal and opposite reaction.
The flows are also related to temperature. So lizards have a different flow force, and are also very close to the ground. Like snakes.. you never see a fury snake.
Insects, extremely close to the ground. Exoskeleton.
I also think that bones are a neutral change location.
«
Last Edit: 08/04/2013 09:31:57 by Pincho
»
Logged
It's your fault if you don't understand me.
Pincho
(OP)
Sr. Member
268
Activity:
0%
Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
Re: Zero Particle Theory
«
Reply #122 on:
08/04/2013 10:45:24 »
Hexagonal Fractals in Nature...
I say that trees are smoothing out an hexagonal fractal. What does that mean? Well it is better if I show you. These next two examples have a clear hexagonal structure, because they are the perfect mathematical size. It's a bit like the perfect woman, you want the best symmetry, well these trees have the best symmetry...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/51035740406@N01/5669558892/
http://urbanist.typepad.com/creature_of_the_shade/2008/07/confronting-vegetation-petrophile-sessilis.html
Logged
It's your fault if you don't understand me.
Pincho
(OP)
Sr. Member
268
Activity:
0%
Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
Re: Zero Particle Theory
«
Reply #123 on:
08/04/2013 11:08:04 »
Holes
Think of a Black Hole as power. A hole is power, and energy in a flow of particles. The whirlpool spinning around a hole is locating energy to a circular space. Locking it there means that it can be used. An electron is a hole, it's energy is a neutral spin around the hole, the same as the flow of water around a whirlpool. Holes are power, and the Earth has a lot of power, so I say that it has a hole.
I want to also add that the important part of atoms is their holes, and their flows. The nucleus is Neutral, but can flow towards negative holes, so the Nucleus can flow towards electrons, and that is time. When a Neutral force moves around a hole, it takes on the hole spin. So then the Neutral force becomes an electric field. Static electricity is the Nucleus flowing through the electrons to become a static electric field. So a balloon can be rubbed, and Neutral forces will change to static electricity. The rubber is not good as a conductor because it is Neutral, but the Neutral easily changes into electrons. You could say that rubber is not a good container of water because it is a full bucket of water already.
«
Last Edit: 08/04/2013 11:12:51 by Pincho
»
Logged
It's your fault if you don't understand me.
Pincho
(OP)
Sr. Member
268
Activity:
0%
Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
Re: Zero Particle Theory
«
Reply #124 on:
08/04/2013 11:34:45 »
The Bose / Einstein Condensate
The condensate is the opposite flow of static electricity. In static electricity the nucleus flows out towards electrons, takes on the electron spin to become energy. The snowflake reverses the flow towards the nucleus.. electrons take on positrons, and move towards Neutral areas. The condensate exaggerates a snowflake to its final solution. Time is flowing backwards.
Logged
It's your fault if you don't understand me.
Pincho
(OP)
Sr. Member
268
Activity:
0%
Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
Re: Zero Particle Theory
«
Reply #125 on:
08/04/2013 11:36:21 »
Where are the positrons?
You see them as photons. Whatever science is calling a positron, isn't a positron. It's probably a double positron. Call it a dirty positron for simplicity. There is some sort of scalar change happening very fast, and it is so fast that a photon is taking on the part of 3 other particles. I think that time is faster than C, so that might be why.
«
Last Edit: 08/04/2013 11:42:02 by Pincho
»
Logged
It's your fault if you don't understand me.
Pincho
(OP)
Sr. Member
268
Activity:
0%
Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
Re: Zero Particle Theory
«
Reply #126 on:
08/04/2013 12:01:04 »
Solving Everything
It may seem hard to believe but over the years I have been solving everything as an independent witness of science. I never studied science so I had to re-invent it all from scratch. That was for fun. So I re-invented things right back from before Newton, and didn't read anything. I came up with Gravity, and Time, and Dimensions, and my own set of particles, and my own set of rules. I have solved almost everything now. It is interesting however to read my old posts. For example when I invented Dark Matter...
http://theabsolute.net/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=4962&start=100
My posts started in 2003, and get progressively better over time. But in the above example I am calling Dark Matter.. ghost. That's because I just invented it. I also invented Dark Flow. The words were not in use at the time, so I just came up with the physics, and gave them my own names. You may think it is strange to call Dark Matter 'Ghost' but I don't think that anybody had heard of Dark Matter in 2009. It had been out of circulation for years. I also invented the Aether, but of course it was already in use. I just didn't know about it. I also invented the Aether sink holes, and spurt holes as time holes.
When I say invented, I mean re-invented without knowing it. To me.. I have solved everything in the Universe, but to everyone else.. I came after somebody else.
But my point is that I have played the parts of Newton, Einstein, and everyone else, all on my own.
This gives me a great deal of vision of the Universe in my mind. I have a real connection with it. I can fly around the Universe, and see everything at any scale. It's amazing.
Logged
It's your fault if you don't understand me.
Pincho
(OP)
Sr. Member
268
Activity:
0%
Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
Re: Zero Particle Theory
«
Reply #127 on:
08/04/2013 12:25:46 »
In the above as well, you have to remember that Dark matter came up in my theory because I was using a push Gravity system. Not because some Galaxy was spinning wrong. Dark Matter is a natural occurrence of a Push Gravity system, and so are bubbles.
Logged
It's your fault if you don't understand me.
Pincho
(OP)
Sr. Member
268
Activity:
0%
Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
Re: Zero Particle Theory
«
Reply #128 on:
08/04/2013 12:42:19 »
Then this link, has yet another link where I think of Dark Matter in 2004, but unfortunately the link has gone...
http://theabsolute.net/phpBB/viewtopic.php?p=115168#p115168
That post caused NASA to notice the Pioneer Anomaly. I asked NASA in Feb 2004 if their spaceships were slowing down, and they said no. Then in August 2004 they had a meeting and found the Pioneer anomaly from some old data going back to 1970.
In the end though it turned out not to be Dark Matter afterall.
Logged
It's your fault if you don't understand me.
Pincho
(OP)
Sr. Member
268
Activity:
0%
Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
Re: Zero Particle Theory
«
Reply #129 on:
09/04/2013 00:19:10 »
Cause And Effect
Cause and effect are added to Newton's 3rd law that every action has an equal, and opposite reaction.
The very first cause...
Inflation from a hole. So you get the sphere, and the hole all at once. Equal, and opposite. Newton's 3rd law.
The effect
Zero is created. The sphere, and it's hole added together equals zero, equal, and opposite. 1 + -1 = 0. You get neutral space.
That happened once, it happens infinitely from infinite points. It equals zero, the opposite of zero is infinity.
What you do here is create an infinite rule that cancels itself out. The positions of the sphere are cancelled out by Newton's Kissing Problem, which is a shape that has a pattern of symmetry from natural cause, and effect.
The next stage is filling in the gaps. There is always a gap to fill in.
Then the particles start to touch each other. Now Newton's 3rd law is to to the opposite to touch.. move away.
Then infinity squashes all of the particles together from inflation. The opposite is to shrink down.
Anyway, eventually form Cause, and effect you get now. And what has happened is that all of the rules of Cause, and effect, and equal, and opposite forced only one possible outcome for the Universe. Zero Particle Theory.
But I say that pull doesn't exist. What is the equal, and opposite to push?
The half tennis ball shows you that the equal, and opposite to a bump surface, is a dip surface. Convex, and concave. So pull, is actually flow into a hole.
And then people wonder how do we start a thought off in our head. What is the first cause of a thought...
The energy of thought is the inflation from a hole the same as the first Cause of the Universe. Not much has actually changed in billions of years. Just a constant set of Cause, and effect, and Newton's 3rd Law.
So why is science so complicated?
In 1746 Isaac Newton became very famous with his ideas on Gravity. A celebrity status, with a bold man as the role model with more men to follow him. I think of the seagulls in Finding Nemo all saying "Pull, pull, pull pull pull, pull..." with trill voices. By turning physics on its head with a pull force instead of a push force science became the most impossible puzzle to solve. Everyone trying to fix this problem, and anyone saying that Gravity is a push force is a joke. It's the Emperors New Suit that you are stupid if you don't call Gravity a pull force.
Then everything started to work nicely backwards, because of Newton's 3rd law that things can be worked out by their opposite reaction. But pull is only similar to flow into a hole, not exact enough to work forever. You end up with Dark matter as a push force.
Now you have a pull force, and Dark Matter as a push force, and yet they are both the exact same force. The problems aren't over yet...
You get this mass where there should be a hole. Nobody used the tennis ball idea, so nobody has the holes in the Earth in the right places, they have mass in the holes. And Electrons get a mass.
Now electrons have a mass so Quantum physics is messed up. because the electron is now backwards, and so the Michelson and Morley experiment is not towards holes it is towards mass. The photon should be in a wind from mass, but not from holes. So that is all backwards.
You have another problem. You don't have electron holes, you have electron mass, so in that hole you have a particle missing. The missing particle is playing the part of gravity. So you have gravity missing. So you need a particle for mass, and come up with the Higgs Boson. So now you have invented a new particle to replace the one in the electron hole. You have really found a scalar particle of some sort, and it doesn't really matter which one it is, because the electron, and positron are scalar particles that make all of the other scalar particles.
So you have missing positrons, and you start the two slit experiment. Guess what, you find the missing positrons, but you don't know about them. So now you think that weird things are happening to photons.
Anyway, it goes on like Bizarro World in Superman comics...
http://noahpinionblog.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/i-found-bizarro-economics-world.html
I turn to these people who can see the emperor in his new suit, and I say "Pull, pull, pull, pull..." in a trill voice. Scientists shout "Banned, Banned, Banned, Banned..."
Brilliant! 1746 is strong in the Bizarros.
Einstein doesn't help. He takes advantage of the mess that science is in. basically, at this point you could say almost anything, and get away with it. With science backwards lets just take physics away completely and give it to the observer. So now the observer is reverse rolled into the physics.
You have a pull force where there should be a push force, and you have an observer watching a train to account for the physics on the train.
Then there should be a flow towards the Earth, but you have a pull, so Einstein decides to bend Spacetime. Oh brilliant!!! The bend was the flow, now it's a bend. You may as well add a twist to the bend because its a plughole, so Einstein adds a twist to the bend, but backwards.
So now you have a pull force that bends spacetime with a twist, instead of simple physics, a flow into holes with a twist.. it's a plughole. No difference.
Then you have a Black Hole with a pull force, and a twist that is a Galaxy. It's a whirlpool. There's no difference.
And out of 7 billion people on Earth, I'm the only one to see it. I don't even feel that clever to work it out really. It's just too obvious to be called clever.
I live on a Bizarro World, all backwards. They tell me to do the maths... it's a joke.
Logged
It's your fault if you don't understand me.
Pincho
(OP)
Sr. Member
268
Activity:
0%
Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
Re: Zero Particle Theory
«
Reply #130 on:
10/04/2013 10:38:27 »
Nucleus propagation and C
First you imagine Frog Spawn. A separation of the egg by a distance of jelly. You turn this into a Newton's Cradle. This is the passing of information by egg. To get the eggs to pass information they must bump each other. So they need to rock around in the jelly. Frog Spawn has a separation distance, and angle similar to Newton's Kissing Problem. If you look at Frog Spawn...
http://doubtfulnews.com/2013/02/goo-up-in-the-trees/
... you will quickly find the Hexagon. That's the Kissing Problem of stacking sphere. The jelly swells up in water, and we will call that scalar for this example. We will call the eggs Positrons. We will think of the jelly as Electrons. We will call one Kissing shape of 13 particles the Zero Particle. And to complete the Zero Particle we will scale all of this down to a gas. So now the jelly is a cloud, and the positrons are floating in the cloud. The cloud bumps in the directions of Newton's Kissing Problem. The positrons swing in the Directions of the bumps. The positrons are swinging like a Newton's Cradle. When the positrons bump they act as Photons. When they don't bump they are hidden in the electron cancellation. 1 + -1 = 0.
The act of creating the Newton's Cradle is both random from the CMB, and also Observer propagated. All you have to do to get the flow in a certain direction is degenerate the cloud. We degenerate the cloud of electrons at an angle through the Newton's Kissing shape to change the Two Slit Experiment from a CMB wave into an Observer Propagated wave. The CMB wave looks different to the Observer wave because it has no direction apart from a newton's Kissing Problem structure, which is mostly hexagonal. Particles passing through a hexagonal structure move in a wave pattern. Hexagons link to other hexagons in a wave formation.
The propagation of light is a Frog Spawn Fractal.
«
Last Edit: 10/04/2013 10:42:30 by Pincho
»
Logged
It's your fault if you don't understand me.
Pincho
(OP)
Sr. Member
268
Activity:
0%
Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
Re: Zero Particle Theory
«
Reply #131 on:
10/04/2013 10:49:25 »
Propagate light, propagate physics
The light, and the physics are related. They work the same way as each other. If you propagate light using the above method, you can propagate mass the same way. If you haven't downloaded my snowflake generator, here it is... press the spacebar to make it work...
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/pinchopaxton/Snowflake.rar
It is the Frog Spawn propagation of matter that creates the snowflake.
Logged
It's your fault if you don't understand me.
Pincho
(OP)
Sr. Member
268
Activity:
0%
Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
Re: Zero Particle Theory
«
Reply #132 on:
10/04/2013 10:58:35 »
The propagation of Gravity
The Propagation of a galaxy
You can keep going.. they are all the same. Everything uses this propagation method. All that is missing is the scalar information for the other particles, and the periodic table of missing eggs in the frog spawn. The protons create an initial pattern of propagation with missing Positrons, so the propagation is a different shape. Instead of a Hexagon you might get a five pointed star. So you get the periodic table. You also get weak shearing through the propagating material as positrons can move to a free area.
Logged
It's your fault if you don't understand me.
Pincho
(OP)
Sr. Member
268
Activity:
0%
Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
Re: Zero Particle Theory
«
Reply #133 on:
10/04/2013 11:27:22 »
My science match for the previous posts moves to another Frog Spawn Fractal...
http://www.space.com/14258-space-bubbles-star-evolution.html
Notice that the fractal is both physically a fractal that energy is in the centre of a bubble of gas, and visually a fractal that the light is a sphere within a sphere. The egg of the frog being the movement, and the jelly being the food.
So...
Tadpole = Movement
matches
Sun = movement
Jelly = Food
Matches
Gas = Food
Sphere in a sphere is both a physical, and aesthetic fractal. The Universe is made from fractals that obey fractal laws.
«
Last Edit: 10/04/2013 11:35:22 by Pincho
»
Logged
It's your fault if you don't understand me.
Pincho
(OP)
Sr. Member
268
Activity:
0%
Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
Re: Zero Particle Theory
«
Reply #134 on:
10/04/2013 12:14:33 »
I sort of wondered if you could actually make a magnetic version of this Newton's cradle. You could try liquid iron, and oil with an iron core suspended from a wire. The wire being attached to an electric current. Put the oil in a trough touching the cores, then switch on the current in a linear direction passing along the wires. The oil should propagate along the iron cores to the end of the trough. If you made the trough a see saw, it could rock back to the beginning again. So now you have an electric rocker switch using Frog Spawn propagation.
If you could make a jelly version with magnetic cores, you could get some nice natural shapes in the jelly. Watch the jelly change into a starfish for example. Or some bouncy balls that start to bounce on their own.
«
Last Edit: 10/04/2013 12:20:15 by Pincho
»
Logged
It's your fault if you don't understand me.
Pincho
(OP)
Sr. Member
268
Activity:
0%
Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
Re: Zero Particle Theory
«
Reply #135 on:
10/04/2013 13:08:06 »
The fractals smooth out.
As the fractal splits, and splits, it smooths out. But when you understand the fractal, you can still see it. I can just about see it in a tree for example. I can just about see it everywhere in this video...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJyUtbn0O5Y&feature=youtube_gdata_player
But it is very smoothed out by now.
Logged
It's your fault if you don't understand me.
Pincho
(OP)
Sr. Member
268
Activity:
0%
Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
Re: Zero Particle Theory
«
Reply #136 on:
10/04/2013 21:08:32 »
Time and Dilation to local points...
The time that I call Poise Time is located inside points. It is at each point of the Frog Spawn, and curls up in there as energy. Per point means local, and local time means that matter must be local to a point to use that time. The outflow of time separates distance of matter to time. So the inflow being local uses the nearest time nucleus, and not its original time nucleus. So when time flows backwards to make a snowflake, it is not backwards to its original location, it is backwards towards a point, where In flow is backwards, and Out flow is forwards. So movement reorganises time backwards from forwards, but different to the the Standard Model time does not have an arrow. It has locality to points, In, and Out.
Logged
It's your fault if you don't understand me.
Pincho
(OP)
Sr. Member
268
Activity:
0%
Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
Re: Zero Particle Theory
«
Reply #137 on:
11/04/2013 00:09:56 »
Growing Old...
In a fractal Universe I have a fractal description of time using holes separated by Newton's Kissing problem. Time flows out for energy propagation, and heat, and time flows back into the nearest local hole for negative propagation, and cold. The negative flow towards holes folds inwards to create snowflake fractals. But it also flows inwards when energy is running low from that hole. Points require energy to hold them open, and that energy is like a plug in the hole. If a point starts to empty, then the plug is out of the hole, and time travels into that hole.
Humans are a DNA energy pack of time. It flows from the holes, and propagates our shape. It uses scalar energy to keep flowing forwards.. but it runs out. At about 40 your time flow has run out, and so time starts flowing backwards for you... yes backwards.
You are not flowing into your past (well just a bit with memory slowly working backwards), but you are taking in energy from the opposite direction... like a hand saw. Energy out, energy in for 40 years to complete the energy cycle.
This change in direction at 40 hits you at first. The slow down is a low peak in your mental abilities. But it gains speed back to something close to before. But now with energy flowing inwards you start to wrinkle. You are taking on the energy of the snowflake fractal, and it isn't smooth, it is wrinkly. Like a balloon going down. You can only last so long on backwards energy, it is like an extra fuel tank.
But the nice thing about it is that you are being stored in holes. So it gives your imagination the chance to say that there is an afterlife, because your energy went into holes. Which is another way to examine DNA... is DNA a person stored in holes?
That is fantasising a bit. Anyway you get older by reversing the energy of time back into holes. You brain starts to pick thing out in the wrong sequence. And then you forget names, because those names are in the wrong order to work in reverse.
Say Tommy is 48, and you remember Tommy at 12. You look at Tommy, he looks to old to be Tommy. Your flow is backwards.
But time itself is only energy. Any reference to Past, and Future is a misunderstanding. It's just a flow force from holes. No need to add anything paranormal to it. It may be fun for scientists to think of these paranormal events, but science should be accuracy, not fun.
Logged
It's your fault if you don't understand me.
Pincho
(OP)
Sr. Member
268
Activity:
0%
Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
Re: Zero Particle Theory
«
Reply #138 on:
11/04/2013 10:35:32 »
The time / origin displacement
Connected particles share an origin. Particles connect locally in X/Y/Z/In/Out/Flat-line. Time connects locally just the same. In / Out / Flat-line are the origin of the force of particles. At the point of In / Out / Flat-line there is scalar regression. Scale works like curvature, and time starts at flat line In / Out. Time is a bit like a trampoline combined with inflation. So if the trampoline is concave you get inflation filling the concave dent. If the trampoline is convex then time is feeding outwards, and you have inflation. We share a fractal with a Universal Membrane. X/Y/Z, and Out are local to us, but In, and Flat-line are local to the Universal membrane. Action at a distance is really local to In/ and Flat-line. The sorting order of the Universal Membrane is scalar. Colours most likely sort to pressure in a Universal membrane, but still appear to us at X / Y /Z coordinates.
Mathematically the origin can be tied to particles as vectors. Physically the origin is tied to particles in the Nucleus of the particle in a hole. The hole in the standard model would lead to the 4th dimension, but the holes are too fragmented to work in the standard model.
The problem with the standard model is that it has no physics for time. So you can make anything work that you like. I always use physics, and I don't know how to get the physics of time working as an arrow. But anyway, my fractal time works better than an arrow, because it allows free thought. If a body is connected to its own time energy it only uses its own time energy locally, and that allows an individual to separate themselves from the rest of the Universe. So that person then has thoughts individual to themselves.. free thought.
If time were an arrow (which I find impossible unless you just use words, and no physics) then free will becomes connected to an arrow of time, and you have no free will.
Anyway Gravity is local, so time should be local, that makes more sense.
I always use physics when I talk of ideas, I have no ideas without physics. I have physics for Gravity, magnetism, time, and nothing. I think that's why the Standard Model is so incomplete, and can get away with just saying the 4th dimension.
Logged
It's your fault if you don't understand me.
Pincho
(OP)
Sr. Member
268
Activity:
0%
Genius is an insult to my intelligence.
Re: Zero Particle Theory
«
Reply #139 on:
11/04/2013 11:06:02 »
Today's science link....
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/04/130410141541.htm
So earlier I was saying that at 40 time starts to flow in reverse for you. The order in which you sort information is taken in reverse. You adapt to this reverse thinking pattern, because you sort things backwards.
4 + 3 = 7
3 + 4 = 7
You don't notice.
But I can give you an example. Sometime soon the World Snooker Championships begin. There are older commentators who used to play the game as World Champions. They often talk about loss of concentration in their older years, and a common complaint is forgetting to pot the ball. This is how snooker works...
In order of thinking...
1/ You calculate the white angle towards another ball to pot that ball.
2/ You look at the next ball that you would want to pot. Calculate how to get onto the next ball within about a 1ft radius of accuracy.
That's the correct order, but a problem begins in older players, that they forget stage 1, and take it for granted.
So the older player...
1/ Calculate how to get onto the next ball within about a 1ft radius of accuracy.
2 Forgets to calculate the white angle towards another ball to pot that ball.
Their thoughts are occurring in reverse order, but so good at potting that the final stage usually doesn't matter. If a professional snooker player could train themselves to think in reverse, then they could become fantastic again.
It is often the first thing that is skipped in older years. because the timing of that first thing seems to make the least sense to you...
"How did I forget to pot the ball, that is the main thing?"
The main thing is turning up last, and you skip it by rushing.
"I'm at the final stage now, the positioning of the ball. So I can't have missed anything out."
But the above link gives you some idea of how we sequence thoughts, and if that sequence is messed up, it is time reversal. But time as an energy source, not as Past, Present, and Future.
Logged
It's your fault if you don't understand me.
Print
Pages:
1
...
5
6
[
7
]
8
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...