The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. Physiology & Medicine
  4. Is the shingles vaccine still useful if I've recently had shingles?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Is the shingles vaccine still useful if I've recently had shingles?

  • 3 Replies
  • 2482 Views
  • 3 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline tamsinbell (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 22
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Is the shingles vaccine still useful if I've recently had shingles?
« on: 27/09/2018 17:47:33 »
Chris asks:

"Would a vaccination be advisable against Shingles if I have suffered with Shingles for the last 6 months or would my body have built up enough antibodies to prevent another bout of Shingles? Would the Shingles vaccination bring on any mild symptoms of Shingles?"

Do you know? Post an answer!
« Last Edit: 01/10/2018 09:53:53 by chris »
Logged
 



Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 10256
  • Activity:
    36.5%
  • Thanked: 1230 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is the shingles vaccine still useful if I've recently had shingles?
« Reply #1 on: 28/09/2018 11:25:26 »
Shingles is the same virus as chicken pox.
- While your immune system quickly clears this virus from your body
- But it can hide out in the nervous system
- The immune system gets weaker as we get older, allowing the virus to break out again

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shingles#Treatment
Logged
 

Offline wolfekeeper

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1622
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 75 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is the shingles vaccine still useful if I've recently had shingles?
« Reply #2 on: 29/09/2018 02:46:46 »
Most likely the symptoms you have are not due to a current shingles attack, but is the nerve damage caused by the attack. Your immune system would likely have rebuilt antibodies to it, but a vaccination wouldn't do any harm. In about 85% of cases the pain goes away within a year.
Logged
 

Offline chris

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7983
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 284 times
  • The Naked Scientist
    • View Profile
    • The Naked Scientists
Re: Is the shingles vaccine still useful if I've recently had shingles?
« Reply #3 on: 01/10/2018 09:51:17 »
Shingles, also called zoster, is a manifestation of varicella zoster virus (VZV), which is a member of the herpesvirus family. These viruses characteristically infect for life, establishing a latent state from which they can later reactivate multiple times, producing a range of symptoms.

In the case of VZV (chicken pox) the primary infection, which is acquired through the air, produces a rash all over the body; this leads to the infection of sensory nerves that subsequently harbour the viral DNA for the lifetime of the infected individual.

Reactivation occurs from these nerve cells; in response to as-yet undefined signals the viral DNA switches on and begins to assemble new virus particles inside the nerve cell. These are exported down the nerve fibre to the overlying skin where they bud out and infect skin cells, producing infectious blisters.

We don't know why, but unlike the primary disease, the reactivation of chicken pox / VZV remains confined to one patch of skin called a dermatome. This region is supplied by one spinal nerve segment, so it may be that the reactivating virus in some way sends signals to the nearby nerves that all supply one body region and in this way promotes all of them to reactivate together.

The result is a strip of painfully-blistered skin; this is the syndrome referred to as shingles. The lesions are loaded with virus and highly infectious.

The virus is normally held in check - and these manifestations prevented - by the immune system, specifically by white blood cells called T cells. These can recognise when an infected cell begins to express viral chemical signatures that herald a reactivation and can kill the relevant cells. As a result, attempts by the virus to reactivate periodically are stamped out without you even realising.

This sub-clinically recurrent reactivation most probably has the effect of re-priming your immune response, encouraging the T cells to up their game and remain vigilant. It's called the Hope-Simpson model after the man who poposed it.

But as we age, or suffer intercurrent immune suppression or other chronic illnesses, the T cell population and the T cell response can dwindle. This can create a chink in the immunological armour, offering the virus an opportunity to break through and produce a shingles manifestation. Some people seem to be more susceptible to this than others.

Off the back of a reactivation, you will develop a much more profound immunity afterwards, but this will extinguish again over time and your vulnerability will return.

The vaccine contains a heavily-attenuated live VZV strain; injected into the muscle it undergoes limited replication but as it does so it displays the full genetic repertoire of the virus to the immune system, helping to re-kindle a comprehensive immune response. This increases the potency of your surveillance, reducing the likelihood of shingles.

Therefore, having the vaccine will reduce the risk of shingles in the near future; but having shingles will also reduce the risk of another attack of shingles in the near future, but probably not for as long as the vaccine because this will be given when you are well and able to make a more resilient immune response. By definition, when you have a shingles attack you are suffering an immune decrement, so this is not the best time to be making a long-lasting immune response.

I hope that answers the question for you.
Logged
I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception - Groucho Marx - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/
 
The following users thanked this post: Edwina Lee



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: shingles  / chicken pox  / shingles vaccine 
 

Similar topics (5)

Has Europe declared a "Vaccine BREXIT"?

Started by evan_auBoard COVID-19

Replies: 22
Views: 2291
Last post 19/03/2021 11:14:55
by Bored chemist
Do you know anyone who died of polio today? Nope, because the polio vaccine

Started by EuropaBoard COVID-19

Replies: 11
Views: 1475
Last post 27/07/2021 03:22:52
by hamdani yusuf
How does the 'flu vaccine work if there is no "live" part to the vaccination?

Started by dentstudentBoard Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 5
Views: 6238
Last post 11/01/2009 03:00:51
by Chemistry4me
Did Multiple vaccine doses result in 145,000 child deaths in past 20 Years?

Started by profoundBoard Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 9
Views: 6312
Last post 06/02/2013 19:54:07
by CliffordK
Are we now taking part in a large scale field trial of the Oxford vaccine?

Started by Colin2BBoard COVID-19

Replies: 4
Views: 1075
Last post 02/01/2021 11:05:48
by alancalverd
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.093 seconds with 39 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.