0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
So you make up a story about some Colin who eats Gods
If Colin exists then God doesn't.So the non-existence of Colin is a pre-requisite for your assertions that God exists.That was true before I wrote about it.The existence of a God requires- and always has required- the absence of Colin.It doesn't matter that mankind may have taken millennia to realise this.
It seems other cultures know him in a different form.
I translated it from a source I wrote earlier.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 21/09/2022 10:48:12It seems other cultures know him in a different form.Your different form of culture has nothing to do with the original you made. You talk to me about a caterpillar that eats the Gods, and you compare it as a source say close to the God eating magic penguin. So who is it ? God who eats or God who is eaten?
Since I am a god-like creature, am I at risk?
Atheists no longer know what to invent as a wacky story to try to convince themselves of the non-existence of God. Eating a God... it's really nonsense.
If someone does think they have a proof of the non existence of Colin, I will go through it, crossing out the word "Colin" and inserting the word "God".In doing so, I will produce a proof of the non existence of God.One way or another, Colin proves that there is no God.
In definition of a God to the detriment of a creature: The God is the creator of all things. Including his creatures. The atheists imply that God would have created a creature which eats it itself and moreover how? God is presumed immortal... Cheers these atheists...
I am not sure when the term galaxy first came into use but it must have been relatively recent.
OK.The question was "Do you recognize the origin of this text?"And, thus far, nobody has said yes.