The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. The Environment
  4. Is Geoengineering safe?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Is Geoengineering safe?

  • 8 Replies
  • 6412 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Scottebright (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 1
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Is Geoengineering safe?
« on: 27/03/2013 04:38:59 »
As the realities of global climate change become ever more alarming, advocates of technological approaches to "geoengineer" the planet's climate are gaining a following.

But the technologies that are promoted -- from spraying sulphate particles into the stratosphere, to dumping iron particles into the ocean, to stimulate carbon absorbing plankton, to burning millions of trees and burying the char in soils -- are all fraught with clear and obvious risks, and are most likely only going to make matters worse.

The connection between the tar sands industry and geoengineering advocates is perhaps not immediately obvious, but it makes perfect, ugly sense. Tar sands investors and their allies have long realized that geoengineering could provide them an extended lease on life -- and a convenient means to avoid the shuttering of their industry, which many consider the single most destructive and climat -- damaging form of energy extraction.

Hence, it isn't surprising that tar sands magnate Murray Edwards, director of Canadian Natural Resources Ltd, actually fact funds a geoengineering company that works on techniques for capturing CO2 from the air called Carbon Engineering.

Carbon Engineering's president, David Keith, is one of the most vocal and best funded advocates of geoengineering. Carbon Dioxide air capture is often viewed as benign or "soft" geoengineering. After all, what could possibly be wrong with removing carbon dioxide from the overloaded atmosphere?

Please:
Phrase all topics as a question.
Don't copy/paste slabs of text from other websites - please quote the source and add some value/commentary - mod.
« Last Edit: 27/03/2013 08:31:46 by evan_au »
Logged
 



Offline CliffordK

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 6595
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 59 times
  • Site Moderator
    • View Profile
Re: Is Geoengineering safe?
« Reply #1 on: 28/03/2013 06:47:29 »
I'm not sure about the conspiracy theory ideas with parties having conflicts of interest. although those in the petroleum industry would necessarily be concerned with the longterm impact of their industry to both the environment as well as the political interpretation of it.

As far as "geoengineering cold", many of the ideas are downright scary, amount to little more than short-term band-aids, have significant potential for side-effects such as acid rain, and are often energy intensive themselves.  Or, in some cases require more destruction of natural resources.

Personally, I think we should also only choose reversible solutions as the CO2 could become a valuable future resource.
Logged
 

Offline peppercorn

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1466
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • View Profile
    • solar
Re: Is Geoengineering safe?
« Reply #2 on: 28/03/2013 12:29:59 »
I can sort of see the argument that a course that includes 'geoengineering' is one that helps validate the aims of the 'business as usual' brigade.  At the same time governments and global agreements are showing no real sign of waking up to make a concerted effort to hit even the watered-down targets already set — So should we at least prepare a contingency plan? ...Yes, probably!

It's a bit like the arguments for and against using wood to replace coal (or co-fire with coal in power stations, more specifically). It might be a good, low cost strategy to cut-out carbon intensive coal burning, but if the wood used is not grown as part of a sustainable cycle (capturing carbon as fast as it is consumed) of agro-scale coppicing then the short-term climate effects could actually be worse than the coal it replaces.
...This invokes an opposite effect to the 'band-aid' of geoengineering. Eventually the use of enormous 'tree-farms' could, if correctly managed (from a full 'embodied carbon' analysis point of view), be an effective way to cancel much of the impact of 'burning stuff' to make electricity, etc; but it will probably be too late to help us now.

So, if a raft of 'band-aid' solutions look a likely way to get some breathing space prior to true catastrophic climate runaway, then perhaps we need to at least start proof-of-concept experiments now!
Logged
Quasi-critical-thinker
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 44613
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 99 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: Is Geoengineering safe?
« Reply #3 on: 04/04/2013 00:41:03 »
I lean to Scotte's view here. Geo engineering is Jules Verne. We're not in a book, as far as I know? Even if we could do it, which we can't, by so many reasons (just consider the UN:s constant failures in getting something done, that doesn't involve some immediate profit for countries involved) it would most probably result in some ecological, biological, catastrophe. And so it would backfire. What we can do is to stop producing CO2 and go to alternative sources of energy, and if that also means nuclear? Not to happy with that from many reasons, centralization for one, and radioactive waste for another, but if we have no choice we could always test those molten sands reactors, and see? But only when we run out of local options.
Logged
"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
 

Offline smart

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2454
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 35 times
  • Breaking the box...
    • View Profile
    • https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=mkt2eu78l7iuk853rp83fp2056&
Re: Is Geoengineering safe?
« Reply #4 on: 09/03/2016 12:20:12 »
Quote from: yor_on on 04/04/2013 00:41:03
I lean to Scotte's view here. Geo engineering is Jules Verne. We're not in a book, as far as I know? Even if we could do it, which we can't, by so many reasons (just consider the UN:s constant failures in getting something done, that doesn't involve some immediate profit for countries involved) it would most probably result in some ecological, biological, catastrophe.


Solar geoengineering is not new. In Canada we can observe chemtrails operations on a daily basis. The election of a new government didn't changed anything. I do think however that the injections of nanoparticles in the stratosphere is likely contributing to the systematic destruction of fragile ecosystems in North America, creating floods, droughts, hurricanes, etc. Geoengineering is an evidence that the sovereignty of Canada in defending the interests of its own citizens is under control by a few corporations racing to establish the new world order.
« Last Edit: 09/03/2016 12:48:00 by tkadm30 »
Logged
Not all who wander are lost...
 



Offline Ophiolite

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 822
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 26 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is Geoengineering safe?
« Reply #5 on: 09/03/2016 16:03:03 »
Quote from: Scottebright on 27/03/2013 04:38:59
After all, what could possibly be wrong with removing carbon dioxide from the overloaded atmosphere?
You imply that there is something wrong with this, yet your principle objection is not to the process, but the individuals and corporations investigating/proposing the process.

So, what do you think is wrong with the idea itself?
Logged
Observe; collate; conjecture; analyse; hypothesise; test; validate; theorise. Repeat until complete.
 

Offline smart

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2454
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 35 times
  • Breaking the box...
    • View Profile
    • https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=mkt2eu78l7iuk853rp83fp2056&
Re: Is Geoengineering safe?
« Reply #6 on: 20/04/2016 11:39:35 »
Quote from: Ophiolite
So, what do you think is wrong with the idea itself?

- The dumping of coal fly ash particulates in the atmosphere may be toxic to humans.
- Sulfate aerosols contributes to acid rain precipitation.
- Geoengineering destroys the ozone layer.
- etc...
Logged
Not all who wander are lost...
 

Offline Tim the Plumber

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 450
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 11 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is Geoengineering safe?
« Reply #7 on: 21/04/2016 20:05:38 »
Why allow a science forum to be a platform for the mad?

This encorages people such as this to think they are actually debating science.
Logged
 

Offline smart

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2454
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 35 times
  • Breaking the box...
    • View Profile
    • https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=mkt2eu78l7iuk853rp83fp2056&
Re: Is Geoengineering safe?
« Reply #8 on: 21/04/2016 21:43:13 »
Quote from: Tim the Plumber on 21/04/2016 20:05:38
Why allow a science forum to be a platform for the mad?

This encorages people such as this to think they are actually debating science.


So according to you, to debate science one should be in favor of all your opinions? I'm happy you call me names if that is motivating you in your trolling and disrespect for proper scientific discussion...
Logged
Not all who wander are lost...
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Are "over the counter" medications safe to mix?

Started by CarolynBoard Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 14
Views: 24376
Last post 21/06/2008 20:49:28
by OldDragon
How does a barium swallow work and what is the barium and is it safe?

Started by Karen W.Board Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 8
Views: 23156
Last post 18/03/2010 02:07:51
by Karen W.
Is "organic" food safe to eat?

Started by alancalverdBoard General Science

Replies: 4
Views: 7800
Last post 02/09/2015 23:22:03
by syhprum
Is Trimming a green maple and a red leafed Japaneese maple..safe ?

Started by Karen W.Board Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

Replies: 9
Views: 14499
Last post 08/06/2007 15:18:55
by Karen W.
Could a fusion/fission hybrid reactor be "fail safe"?

Started by GeezerBoard Technology

Replies: 0
Views: 4530
Last post 22/04/2011 23:46:48
by Geezer
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.129 seconds with 60 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.