0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Although the Strong Nuclear Force is much greater than the measured gravitational force leaving the nucleus and propagating outward from the electron cloud - on the order of 10^35 times stronger, they are actually both the same force. The Strong Nuclear Force just seems to disappear outside the nucleus. It does not actually disappear.
If two protons come in contact with each other,
I’m posting the Conclusion from your on-line book, “Nuclear Gravitation Field Theory”:Conclusion Compelling evidence that the Strong Nuclear Force and Gravity are one and the same is provided below: 1 The methodology for the filling of Proton and Neutron Energy Levels in the Nucleus of the Atom indicates that the Strong Nuclear Force field propagates omnidirectional outward to infinity from the Nucleus. When the Nucleus has a sufficient number of nucleons present to form a near perfect sphere, the Strong Nuclear Force field propagates outward omnidirectional to infinity with spherical symmetry resulting in the Gravitational Potential Field following a 1/r2 function. Therefore, the outward propagation of the Strong Nuclear Force field is consistent with Newton’s Law of Gravity. 2 The observed virtual disappearance of the Strong Nuclear Force at the surface of the Nucleus is a result of extreme Space-Time Compression. This General Relativistic effect can only occur if the Strong Nuclear Force field is Gravity. Only Gravity fields can accelerate light, electric fields, or magnetic fields to produce Space-Time Compression. Gravity propagates based upon Uncompressed Space-Time; Light, Electric Fields, and Magnetic Fields propagate based upon Compressed Space-Time. 3 Neutrons are required to be added to the Nucleus to raise the strength to the Strong Nuclear Force to overcome the rising Coulombic Repulsion Force of the Protons as Protons are added to the Nucleus. Space-Time Compression within the Nucleus results in the Nuclear Gravitation Field rising slower than the Nuclear Electric Field as Protons are added to the Nucleus. The Nuclear Gravitation Field propagates outward within the Nucleus based upon Uncompressed Space-Time so its intensity rises slower / drops faster than the Nuclear Electric Field propagating outward through the Nucleus. 4 The Strong Nuclear Force appears to saturate as Protons and Neutrons are added to the Nucleus - Element 83, Bismuth-209, is the largest known Nucleus that is stable. Space-Time Compression within the Nucleus results in the Nuclear Gravitation Field rising slower than the Nuclear Electric Field as Protons are added to the Nucleus. The Nuclear Gravitation Field propagates outward within the Nucleus based upon Uncompressed Space-Time so its intensity rises slower / drops faster than the Nuclear Electric Field propagating outward through the Nucleus. The Nuclear Electric Field is approaching the strength of the Nuclear Gravitation Field, therefore, the Elements beyond Bismuth are radioactive.Strong Nuclear Force = Gravity _______________________________________________________________________________My first question is, does this book, in your estimation, serve to reconcile General Relativity and QM, to the extent that if the strong nuclear force equals gravity, then the curvature of space in the macro realm, and the strong nuclear force in the quantum realm, combine into one grand unifying theory?Second question, do you have a brother named Ned? I note that point #3 addresses the argument posted by Thebox.
Quote from: Thebox on 01/08/2017 15:20:503. does not really explain itI like the idea but....If the opp does not explain exactly what the strong nuclear force is , nothing as been achieved. We could say strong nuclear force, we could say gravity, but that is still not answer, charge is an answer although it may be wrong or right, at this time I do not know. We cant keep using words to explain something that has no real description of the word. strong nuclear force = gravity = ?Something = something does not compute .It is incompleteStrong nuclear force = gravity = mass= charge Would be complete but not necessarily correct.I stand corrected. #3 addressed the issue that protons repel each other, which I thought you were pointing out.
3. does not really explain itI like the idea but....If the opp does not explain exactly what the strong nuclear force is , nothing as been achieved. We could say strong nuclear force, we could say gravity, but that is still not answer, charge is an answer although it may be wrong or right, at this time I do not know. We cant keep using words to explain something that has no real description of the word. strong nuclear force = gravity = ?Something = something does not compute .It is incompleteStrong nuclear force = gravity = mass= charge Would be complete but not necessarily correct.
I too like the idea that the strong force equals gravity, because it makes the quantum solution to gravity a much simpler matter. One quantum process that works at all levels.
I'm not sure that the quantum solution for gravity will discriminate by charge. Positive, neutral, negative; isn't it all the same, as long as it has mass?