The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Member Map
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side
New Theories
The Big Bang
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
The Big Bang
0 Replies
2295 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
guest39538
Guest
The Big Bang
«
on:
11/03/2015 10:37:17 »
Science presently suggests a big bang theory, a big bang from a singular point that space-time started from and all matter was made.
Before the big bang science says that nothing exists, not even space or time.
Science also says that the Universe is expanding and space is expanding with the observed matter and beyond the expanding space there is nothing.
All evidential Physics of this Earth show evidently that for anything to expand, the anything needs space to expand into.
All evidence of observation is relative to matter and not relative to space. Space is un-observed and transparent.
I propose that the expansion of the Universe is dependent on the matter travelling through space and space itself does not expand.
I propose that the blackness background of space is no different than localised see through space(transparent) and that any matter or light emitter in that boundary of visual limitations is to small to see by perspective distance and vanishing points, also any light is too weak to be seen by distance giving a perceived observation of a blackness background and an expanding space, the comparison to being within a box.
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...